Marine Ecology Progress Series: Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea Camilo Mora1, 3,*, Peter F. Sale2

http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m434p251.pdf
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES. Vol. 434: 251–266, 2011
doi: 10.3354/meps09214 Published July 28, 2011
Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Biodiversity, ecosystems and coastal zone management’

1Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada
2Institute for Water, Environment and Health, United Nations University, Port Carling, Ontario P0B 1J0, Canada
3Present address: Department of Geography, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

ABSTRACT: A leading strategy in international efforts to reverse ongoing losses in biodiversity is the use of protected areas. We use a broad range of data and a review of the literature to show that the effectiveness of existing, and the current pace of the establishment of new, protected areas will not be able to overcome current trends of loss of marine and terrestrial biodiversity. Despite local successes of well-designed and well-managed protected areas proving effective in stemming biodiversity loss, there are significant shortcomings in the usual process of implementation of protected areas that preclude relying on them as a global solution to this problem. The shortcomings include technical problems associated with large gaps in the coverage of critical ecological processes related to individual home ranges and propagule dispersal, and the overall failure of such areas to protect against the broad range of threats affecting ecosystems. Practical issues include budget constraints, conflicts with human development, and a growing human population that will increase not only the extent of anthropogenic stressors but the difficulty in successfully enforcing protected areas. While efforts towards improving and increasing the number and/or size of protected areas must continue, there is a clear and urgent need for the development of additional solutions for biodiversity loss, particularly ones that stabilize the size of the world’s human population and our ecological demands on biodiversity.

KEY WORDS: Land protected areas · Marine protected areas · Effectiveness · Conservation ·
Biodiversity loss · Human population · Human consumption

AFP: Ocean acidification may be worst in 300 million years: study & NYTImes Editorial: Changing the Chemistry of the Earth’s Oceans

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i_Z1zrB_r470qEJTpTvNGCLIZOew?docId=CNG.972672bf2c229393667b758b16f9bd6a.491

(AFP) – 5 days ago March 1, 2012

WASHINGTON — High levels of pollution may be turning the planet’s oceans acidic at a faster rate than at any time in the past 300 million years, with unknown consequences for future sea life, researchers said Thursday.

The acidification may be worse than during four major mass extinctions in history when natural pulses of carbon from asteroid impacts and volcanic eruptions caused global temperatures to soar, said the study in the journal Science.

An international team of researchers from the United States, Britain, Spain, Germany and the Netherlands examined hundreds of paleoceanographic studies, including fossils wedged in seafloor sediment from millions of years ago.

They found only one time in history that came close to what scientists are seeing today in terms of ocean life die-off — a mysterious period known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum about 56 million years ago.

Though the reason for the carbon upsurge back then remains a source of debate, scientists believe that the doubling of harmful emissions drove up global temperatures by about six degrees Celsius and caused big losses of ocean life.

Oceans are particularly vulnerable because they soak up excess carbon dioxide from the air which turns the waters more acidic, a state that can kill corals, mollusks and other forms of reef and shell organisms.

“We know that life during past ocean acidification events was not wiped out — new species evolved to replace those that died off,” said lead author Barbel Honisch, a paleoceanographer at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

“But if industrial carbon emissions continue at the current pace, we may lose organisms we care about — coral reefs, oysters, salmon.”

Honish and colleagues said the current rate of ocean acidification is at least 10 times faster than it was 56 million years ago.

“The geological record suggests that the current acidification is potentially unparalleled in at least the last 300 million years of Earth history, and raises the possibility that we are entering an unknown territory of marine ecosystem change,” said co-author Andy Ridgwell of Bristol University.

The UN Environment Program released a report in 2010 that warned carbon emissions from fossil fuels may bear a greater risk for the marine environment than previously thought.

Rising acidity levels have an impact on calcium-based lifeforms, ranging from tiny organisms called ptetropods that are the primary food source, to crabs, fish, lobsters and coral, it said.

The UN report called for cuts in human-made CO2 emissions to reduce acidification and support for further work to quantify the risk and identify species that could be most in peril.

Special thanks to Craig Quirolo.

New York Times

EDITORIAL
Changing the Chemistry of Earth’s Oceans
Published: March 9, 2012

The oceans have always served as a sink for carbon dioxide, but the burning of fossil fuels since the beginning of the industrial revolution, especially over the last 40 years, has given them more than they can safely absorb. The result is acidification – a change in the chemical balance that threatens the oceans’ web of life.

In earth’s history, there have been many episodes of acidification, mainly from prolonged volcanic eruptions. According to a new research review by paleoceanographers at Columbia University, published in Science, the oceans may be turning acid far faster than at any time in the past 300 million years.

Changing something as fundamental as the pH of seawater – a measurement of how acid or alkaline it is – has profound effects. Increased acidity attacks the shells of shellfish and the skeletal foundation of corals, dissolving the calcium carbonate they’re made of. Coral reefs are among the most diverse ecosystems on the planet. Ocean acidification threatens the corals and every other species that makes its living on the reefs.

The authors tried to determine which past acidification events offer the best comparison to what is happening now. The closest analogies are catastrophic events, often associated with intense volcanic activity resulting in major extinctions. The difference is that those events covered thousands of years. We have acidified the oceans in a matter of decades, with no signs that we have the political will to slow, much less halt, the process.

A version of this editorial appeared in print on March 10, 2012, on page A18 of the New York edition with the headline: Changing the Chemistry of Earth’s Oceans.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

UC Davis: Stinging and Seeing

View this story on the Web at

University of California, Davis
March 5, 2012

New research from the University of California shows how the ability
to detect light could have evolved before anything like an eye.

As published today (March 5) in the journal BMC Biology, the research
is based on the stinging mechanism in the tiny, brainless and eyeless
freshwater polyp Hydra magnipapillata. Part of a group of animals
called cnidarians that includes sea anemones, corals and jellyfish, a
hydra is essentially a mouth surrounded by tentacles armed with
stinging cells, or cnidocytes.

The researchers — David Plachetzki, now a postdoctoral researcher at
UC Davis, working with undergraduate Caitlin Fong and Professor Todd
Oakley in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology at
UC Santa Barbara — discovered a simple nervous system linking the
stinging cells and nerve cells that detect light using a process
similar to the human eye’s.

The nerve cells express a set of genes including opsin, a
light-sensitive pigment; cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels; and
arrestin. These components are basically the same as those in the
light-detecting pathway in animals with eyes, including people.

The hydra fire their stingers less in bright than in dim light, the
researchers found. When they blocked one of the pathway’s components,
the hydra acted as if they were in dim light and fired their stingers
more.

Most of the hydra’s cnidarian relatives lack eyes. But all cnidarians
have cnidocyte stinging cells.

“This capacity for stinging cell regulation by light-sensitive
neurons could have predated the evolution of eyes in cnidarians,”
Plachetzki said. Future work will be aimed at how these findings
relate to the evolution of eyes in other groups of animals.

The National Science Foundation funded the work.

Media contact(s):
* David Plachetzki, Center for Population Biology,
plachetzki@ucdavis.edu
* Andy Fell, UC Davis News Service, (530) 752-4533, ahfell@ucdavis.edu

Special thanks to Craig Quirolo

NOAA Fisheries announces the release of the *2012 Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program Report to Congress (with focus on SE Florida)

http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/corals/deepseacorals/fy12/DSCRtCFinal.pdf

This report highlights the exciting discovery of deep-sea coral habitats as well as progress made in our nationwide research.

* *

Featured in the report is an overview of the program’s first three-year field study, focused on the Southeast U.S., which revealed new and currently unprotected deep-sea coral communities off the eastern and southern coasts of Florida. These fragile habitats are home to a wide variety of species, many of which are commercially important. NOAA’s deep-water coral investigations have been instrumental in providing data and documentation on the distribution and ecological significance of these resources.

In addition to the discoveries off the southeastern U.S., scientists are exploring deep-sea coral and sponge habitats off the West Coast, documenting their importance for fish, and providing key information to fishery and National Marine Sanctuary managers.

The report is complemented by descriptions all the program’s activities on our website: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/deepseacorals

NOAA’s *Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program *provides scientific information needed to conserve and manage deep-sea coral habitats. We are committed to increasing the scientific understanding of these rich and valuable communities and making it available to ocean resource managers to inform conservation actions. The Program’s work is made possible through partnerships with other federal agencies, academic scientists and non-governmental organizations. I thank the many of you who have participated in making this a successful Program.

Tom Hourigan

Chief Scientist, Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program
_______________________________________________
Special thanks to:

Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List@coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list

Earthjustice, Center for Biological Diversity: Lawsuit Aims to Protect Endangered Caribbean Corals from Overfishing; Elkhorn and staghorn corals need parrotfish to survive

For Immediate Release: January 30, 2012

Contact:

Andrea Treece, Earthjustice, (415) 217-2089

Miyoko Sakashita, Center for Biological Diversity, (415) 632-5308

Washington, D.C. – A lawsuit was filed today in federal district court seeking greater protections from fishing for threatened coral reefs in the Caribbean. The
lawsuit asserts that the National Marine Fisheries Service ignored science showing that parrotfish and other grazing fish play a key role in promoting the health of coral reefs; the government’s authorization of targeted fishing for parrotfish poses a risk to elkhorn and staghorn corals, protected under the Endangered Species Act.

“The Caribbean’s coral reefs are already in deep trouble, and reducing the parrotfish that help them stay healthy only makes matters worse,” said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “If we don’t take steps now to safeguard the creatures that keep these vital reefs alive, we risk losing all of it.”

According to the lawsuit, the National Marine Fisheries Service violated the Endangered Species Act by finding that the targeted fishing for parrotfish would not jeopardize already imperiled corals or “adversely modify,” (i.e. damage) their critical habitat.

Excessive algal growth threatens the health of Caribbean reefs, choking out corals and degrading the habitat that other reef creatures-such as fish, sea turtles and lobsters-depend on. Fish, especially parrotfish, which graze on algae around coral reefs, play a key function in providing suitable habitat for corals to settle and build those reefs. Fish populations in the
Caribbean have been overfished, including the parrotfish that are the subject of this lawsuit; managing the overfishing of parrotfish will help corals recover and become more resilient to other threats, including global warming and ocean acidification.

“Restoring healthy populations of elkhorn and staghorn coral is critical to restoring the health of Caribbean reefs as a whole,” said Andrea Treece, an attorney with Earthjustice. “These corals provide shelter, nursery grounds, and hunting grounds for an incredible array of fish, lobsters, sea turtles and other species. Without better protection, we risk losing the entire reef community.”

“Corals are competing with algae, and without a robust population of parrotfish, the algae are going to win,” said Sakashita. “But wise management of our reefs can keep algae in check and promote both healthy corals and healthy fish.”

Elkhorn and staghorn corals were once the dominant reef-building corals in the Caribbean but they are perilously close to extinction. Corals suffer from a variety of threats, including pollution, global warming and ocean acidification. A key threat to corals, however, continues to be overfishing and competition with algae. The corals have declined by more than 90 percent
since the 1970s. In 2006, the two corals were protected under the Endangered Species Act in response to a petition by the Center for Biological Diversity.

Learn more:
* Parrotfish to aid reef repair
– BBC (video)
* Read the complaint.

Special thanks to Andrew Baker/ Coral-list @noaa.gov