Firstcoastnews.com: BP spill money funds Fla. snapper project

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/rss/article/336506/4/BP-spill-money-funds-Fla-snapper-project

11:36 AM, Nov 24, 2013 |

A $3 million, five-year project to expand data collection on red snapper and other reef fish stocks in the northern and eastern Gulf of Mexico is being hailed by Ocean Conservancy as a major milestone in the recovery of the marine resources affected by the 2010 BP oil spill disaster.

The Enhanced Assessment for Recovery of Gulf of Mexico Fisheries is one of six Florida projects funded by $15.7 million of BP and Transocean criminal fine money that addresses high priority conservation needs, ?according to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation that’s administering the money.

“This is a good investment of BP fine money in the sustainability of the fisheries,” said ?Elizabeth Fetherston, a marine restoration strategist for Ocean Conservancy based in St. ?Petersburg.

It’s the first project funded by oil spill recovery money targeting fisheries and, more importantly, for red snapper stocks that “are incredibly important to the Gulf of Mexico and Pensacola’s fishing, ?tourism and seafood industry,” Fetherston said.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is managing the project.

Gil McRae, director of the agency’s research institute, said the findings from the project will fill critical gaps in data collection.

Gulf fisheries are managed by both state and federal agencies, and at times there’s confusion over harvest estimates, he said.

That system, based on the estimates of pounds caught a season, is very difficult to track accurately and leads to unpredictable regulations on the length and times of fishing seasons, McRea said. This has created discontent among commercial and recreational fishing communities, he said.

McRae’s team will put researchers on commercial and recreational fishing boats that volunteer for the program to more accurately document first hand what’s being caught, what’s being released and how many of the released fish are surviving.

“What we hope is the information will improve the predictability of the season and prevent wide swings in regulations of size limits and bag limits,” he said. “The project is all about getting better data to better manage offshore fisheries, especially red snapper.”

Another highlight of the project is developing smartphone apps that would allow anglers to record their catches in a central computer.

Enhanced assessment of the fisheries stock will lead to greater ability to sustain the populations, McRea said.

Will Patterson, a University of South Florida marine sciences biology professor who has been studying the impacts of the oil spill on fish populations, said more detailed studies of this scope have been conducted in the western Gulf, but there’s never been a study of this caliber east of Pensacola.

“The information that’s going to be collected will be based on what fish are living here, how fast they grow, where they live and how much they eat. That’s information we’ve not had.”
Charter boat captain Baz Yelverton of Gulf Breeze runs snapper trips into the Gulf.

He said he believes the assessment is a step in the right direction in better managing the fisheries.

“But what I’d really like to see happen is effort put into finding ways to (harmlessly) repel dolphins from where you’re fishing,” he said. “They’re a real problem. They wait until you throw your snapper back in the water, and they’re right there eating them. Let a snapper have a chance of getting back in the water.”

Pensacola News Journal, Kim Blair
Special thanks to Richard Charter

NFW: Artificial Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico: A Review of Gulf State Programs & Key Considerations

Review-of-GoM-Artificial-Reefs-Report

http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/Reports/Archive/2013/11-08-13-Review-of-Gulf-of-Mexico-Artificial-Reefs.as

New National Wildlife Federation white paper encourages decision-makers to take environmental considerations into account when developing new artificial reefs.
11-08-2013 // Ryan Fikes

ArtificialReef_UnivofFL Over the past few decades the five Gulf States have built artificial reefs both inshore and offshore with the aim of enhancing recreational fishing and diving opportunities. State and local governments on the Gulf Coast have expressed interest in creating additional artificial reefs with some of the money from the federal penalties resulting from the BP oil disaster.

This white paper, Artificial Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico: A Review of Gulf State Programs & Key Considerations, encourages decision-makers to take environmental considerations into account when developing new artificial reefs. The paper provides a review of existing programs and offers key recommendations as governments consider creating additional artificial reefs.

Artificial reefs are materials placed on the sea floor to attract fish or otherwise influence physical or biological processes related to living marine resources. Artificial reefs attract certain species of fish and therefore have high recreational value for both fishing and diving activities.

The Northern Gulf of Mexico has somewhat limited natural reefs; these habitats include rock banks, oyster reefs, and coral reefs. Oyster reefs are a particularly valuable type of natural reef habitat that provide food and habitat for many different species of fish, birds, and other wildlife. Unfortunately, over half of the historic oyster reefs in the estuaries of the Gulf Coast have been lost. Decision-makers should prioritize replacing lost natural habitats such as oyster reefs when considering construction of new reef structures.

The paper provides considerations for maximizing the potential habitat value of any new artificial reefs. More research is needed in order to effectively compare the functionality of artificial reefs and their impacts on fish and wildlife to their natural counterparts.
Related Resources

Special thanks to Richard Charter

[Coral-List] NMFS’ 90-day finding on petition to list 23 corals

Today the National Marine Fisheries Service published their 90-day finding
on a petition to list 23 coral species under the Endangered Species Act. The
23 corals are part of a wider set of 81 marine species the agency was
petitioned to list in July 2013. The finding determined that the available
information presents substantial scientific or commercial data or
information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for
three species (*Cantharellus noumeae, Siderastrea glynni*, and *Tubastraea
floreana*). We will initiate a status review of these species and we seek
information from interested parties and the public on the status, threats,
and conservation of these species. The public comment period opened today
and ends 24 December 2013. A 12-month finding on whether or not to propose
ESA listing for one or more of these three species is the next step in the
process.

We also determined that the petition did not present substantial
information indicating the petitioned actions may be warranted for the
remaining 20 species. These 20 species are: *Acropora roseni, Acropora
suharsonoi, Alveopora excelsa, Alveopora minuta, Ctenella chagius,
Hydnophora bonsai, Isopora togianensis, Lithophyllon ranjithi, Lobophyllia
serratus, Millepora boschmai, Millepora striata, Montipora setosa,
Parasimplastrea sheppardi, Pectinia maxima, Pocillopora fungiformis,
Porites desilveri, Porites eridani, Porites ornata, Rhizopsammia
wellingtoni, *and *Stylophora madagascarensis*. This ends the review
process for these 20 species.

The 90-day finding, petition, link to the online public comment site, and
other information are all available at:
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/petition81.htm

best regards

Dwayne

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dwayne Meadows, Ph.D.
Species of Concern National Program Coordinator
Endangered Species Division
Office of Protected Resources (F/PR3)
National Marine Fisheries Service
1315 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(301) 427-8467
FAX: (301) 713-4060
Dwayne.Meadows@noaa.gov
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/concern/

Coral-List: Nova Southeastern University Report on Coral Spawning 2013

Hello all,
After the full moon in July, August, and September, researchers in 7 regions of the Caribbean (Mexico, Curacao, Belize, St. Thomas, Florida, Flower Gardens, Columbia) monitoring 9 coral species (A. cervicornis, A. palmata, A.. prolifera, Diploria/Pseudodiploria strigosa , Dendrogyra cylindrus, Montastraea/Orbicella franksi, M. annularis, M. faveolata, Montastraea cavernosa) for spawning activity. Overall it was a great year for Caribbean coral spawning.
For detailed information on location, spawning times, and environmental conditions, log into google docs and follow this link:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuCz7WiTRAnkdGNpZ1k1VGwwb1NUYjdXR3BrQ0k3a1E&usp=sharing

Please email me (nicole.fogarty@nova.edu) if you have any corrections or additional spawning observations. You can also join us on the “coral spawning research” facebook page for real time accounts of coral spawning events.

Nicole D. Fogarty, PhD
Assistant Professor
Nova Southeastern University
Oceanographic Center
8000 N. Ocean Drive
Dania Beach, FL 33004-3078
(954) 262-3630

Common Dreams: Human Assault Pushes Ocean to Limit Unseen in 300 Million Years

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/10/03

Published on Thursday, October 3, 2013 by Common Dreams

‘We are entering an unknown territory of marine ecosystem change,’ warns report. ‘The next mass extinction may have already begun.’
– Jon Queally, staff writer

The news, the evidence that supports it, and the warning that accompanies it could hardly be more dire.

The latest audit by an international team of marine scientists at the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) found that the world’s oceans and marine life are facing an unprecedented threat by combination of industrial pollution, human-driven global warming and climate change, and continued and rampant overfishing.

According to the report, The State of the Ocean 2013: Perils, Prognoses and Proposals, the degradation of the ocean ecosystem means that its role as Earth’s ‘buffer’ is being seriously compromised. As a result, the authors of the report call for “urgent remedies” because the “rate, speed, and impacts of change in the global ocean are greater, faster, and more imminent than previously thought.”

“[Last week’s] UN climate report confirmed that the ocean is bearing the brunt of human-induced changes to our planet. These findings give us more cause for alarm – but also a roadmap for action. We must use it.” -Prof. Dan Laffoley, IUCN

Driven by accumulations of carbon, the scientists found, the rate of acidification in the oceans is the highest its been in over 300 million years. Additionally, de-oxygenation–caused by both warming and industrial runoff–is stripping the ocean of its ability to support the plants and animals that live in it.

The combined stressors, according to the report, are “unprecedented in the Earth’s known history. We are entering an unknown territory of marine ecosystem change, and exposing organisms to intolerable evolutionary pressure. The next mass extinction may have already begun.”

Professor Alex Rogers of Somerville College, Oxford, and Scientific Director of IPSO said: “The health of the ocean is spiraling downwards far more rapidly than we had thought. We are seeing greater change, happening faster, and the effects are more imminent than previously anticipated. The situation should be of the gravest concern to everyone since everyone will be affected by changes in the ability of the ocean to support life on Earth.”

Among the report’s comprehensive findings, the panel identified the following areas as of greatest cause for concern:

• De-oxygenation: the evidence is accumulating that the oxygen inventory of the ocean is progressively declining. Predictions for ocean oxygen content suggest a decline of between 1% and 7% by 2100. This is occurring in two ways: the broad trend of decreasing oxygen levels in tropical oceans and areas of the North Pacific over the last 50 years; and the dramatic increase in coastal hypoxia (low oxygen) associated with eutrophication. The former is caused by global warming, the second by increased nutrient runoff from agriculture and sewage.

• Acidification: If current levels of CO2 release continue we can expect extremely serious consequences for ocean life, and in turn food and coastal protection; at CO2 concentrations of 450-500 ppm (projected in 2030-2050) erosion will exceed calcification in the coral reef building process, resulting in the extinction of some species and decline in biodiversity overall.

• Warming: As made clear by the IPCC, the ocean is taking the brunt of warming in the climate system, with direct and well-documented physical and biogeochemical consequences. The impacts which continued warming is projected to have in the decades to 2050 include: reduced seasonal ice zones, including the disappearance of Arctic summer sea ice by ca. 2037; increasing stratification of ocean layers, leading to oxygen depletion; increased venting of the GHG methane from the Arctic seabed (a factor not considered by the IPCC); and increased incidence of anoxic and hypoxic (low oxygen) events.

• The ‘deadly trio’ of the above three stressors – acidification, warming and deoxygenation – is seriously effecting how productive and efficient the ocean is, as temperatures, chemistry, surface stratification, nutrient and oxygen supply are all implicated, meaning that many organisms will find themselves in unsuitable environments. These impacts will have cascading consequences for marine biology, including altered food web dynamics and the expansion of pathogens.

• Continued overfishing is serving to further undermine the resilience of ocean systems, and contrary to some claims, despite some improvements largely in developed regions, fisheries management is still failing to halt the decline of key species and damage to the ecosystems on which marine life depends. In 2012 the UN FAO determined that 70% of world fish populations are unsustainably exploited, of which 30% have biomass collapsed to less than 10% of unfished levels. A recent global assessment of compliance with Article 7 (fishery management) of the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, awarded 60% of countries a “fail” grade, and saw no country identified as being overall “good”.

Regarding the urgency of the crisis, the marine scientists issued a stark warning to world governments, called on leaders to take immediate action, and offered the following steps they said “must” be taken:

• Reduce global C02 emissions to limit temperature rise to less than 2oC, or below 450 CO2e. Current targets for carbon emission reductions are insufficient in terms of ensuring coral reef survival and other biological effects of acidification, especially as there is a time lag of several decades between atmospheric CO2 and CO2 dissolved in the ocean. Potential knock-on effects of climate change in the ocean, such as methane release from melting permafrost, and coral dieback, mean the consequences for human and ocean life could be even worse than presently calculated.

• Ensure effective implementation of community- and ecosystem-based management, favouring small-scale fisheries. Examples of broad-scale measures include introducing true co-management with resource adjacent communities, eliminating harmful subsidies that drive overcapacity, protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems, banning the most destructive fishing gear, and combating IUU fishing.

• Build a global infrastructure for high seas governance that is fit-for-purpose. Most importantly, secure a new implementing agreement for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction under the auspices of UNCLOS.

In response to the IPSO study that arrived just one week after the IPCC report on climate change which also highlighted the threat of global warming to the oceans, Professor Dan Laffoley, of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, said: “What these latest reports make absolutely clear is that deferring action will increase costs in the future and lead to even greater, perhaps irreversible, losses. The UN climate report confirmed that the ocean is bearing the brunt of human-induced changes to our planet. These findings give us more cause for alarm – but also a roadmap for action. We must use it.”