Category Archives: Uncategorized

Journal of Applied Ecology: Effects Of Recreational Scuba Diving On Coral Reefs: Trampling On Reef-Flat Communities by J. Hawkins, C. Roberts

http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/journals_publications/journalofappliedecology/index.php

Julie P. Hawkins and Callum M. Roberts
Research Center, Sharim-el- Sheikh, Egypt
Journal of Applied Ecology 1993, 30, p.25-30.

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of trampling by scuba divers and snorkelers on reef-flats of coral reefs near Sharim-el- Sheikh, a popular resort in Egypt.

There were significantly more damaged coral colonies and loose fragments of live coral rocks in heavily trampled areas. Percentage cover of bare rock and rubble was also significantly greater; conversely numbers of hard coral colonies and total percentage of live coral cover were lower.

Coral colonies were smaller in trampled compared to control areas, with average height and diameter significantly less in heavily trampled areas. An area regularly visited be snorkelers exhibited intermediate effects.

Coral species composition and the relative abundances of different coral growth forms did nor appear to be affected by the trampling.

Several of the effects detected differed between outer and middle zones of the reef flat, suggesting that some communities were more vulnerable to trampling than others.

In addition to causing biological damage, trampling reduced the aesthetic appeal of the reef-flat for tourists. An effective management strategy might therefore be to contain trampling within narrow areas rather than allowing free access by divers.

USGS: Fate And Pathways Of Injection-Well Effluent In The Florida Keys by E.A. Shinn, et al.

http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/94-276/index.html\

Eugene A. Shinn, Ronald S. Reese and Christopher D. Reich
USGS Coastal Geology Center, St. Petersburg, Florida
USGS Water Resources Division Office, Miami, Florida


US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey OFR 94-276 1994

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I. Twenty four wells (21 locations) were core drilled into the limestone beneath the Keys, reef tract, and outer reefs to determine if sewage effluents injected in class V wells onshore are reaching offshore reef areas via underground flow.

These wells were fitted with PVC casings and well screens and were sampled every three months for a period of one year.

Analyses showed consistent hypersalinity in most wells and a marked increase in nitrogen (as ammonia) in offshore ground water.

Other forms of nitrogen (NO2 and NO3) and phosphorus were not particularly elevated in offshore ground water but were above the levels found in surface marine water.

The highest levels of nitrogen (NO2 NO3) and phosphorus were in shallow onshore groundwaters.

Sources for the nutrients in the shallow onshore groundwater consist of septic tanks and cesspools (@ 24,000 and 5,000 in the Florida Keys respectively), agricultural fertilizers, and natural vegetation.

Ammonia concentrations were low in shallow ground waters beneath the Florida Keys, probably because of oxidizing conditions.

II. Tidal pumping is particularly active, especially nearshore. Hydraulic heads sufficient to elevate well water as much as 7 cm above sea level during falling tides were detected in all nearshore wells.

During rising tides, the situation was reversed and water flowed into the wells. Tidal pumping implies considerable water movement both in and out of the upper few meters of limestone.

Tidal pumping is a likely mechanism for mixing and transferring nutrient-rich ground water into the overlying marine waters.

Although tidal pumping should cause rather complete mixing and dilution of any freshwater-based effluents entering the limestone via the more than 600 disposal wells in the Florida Keys, the ground waters in the 30 to 40 ft depth range (9-12m) nevertheless remained slightly hypersaline relative to sea water throughout the year.

III. Rock analyses of material from our cores do not prove or disprove the hypothesis that limestone beneath the Keys or reef tract is serving as a sink for phosphorus and other nutrients.

The data, however do not rule out phosphorus uptake by limestone adjacent to disposal sources.

For the purposes of this study, monitoring wells were not positioned sufficiently close to injection wells to determine if uptake phosphorus is taking place.

Ground waters were found to contain more dissolved solids that could be accounted for if hypersalinity resulted from simple evaporation of sea water.

These data indicate that ground waters in the vicinity of our wells are dissolving solids from the rock rather than precipitating material within the rock framework; however, as mentioned above, our wells were not positioned sufficiently close to disposal wells to determine if localized uptake is occurring.

IV. Examination of rock cores from these wells revealed a general distribution of reef-and grainstone-facies belts. The Upper and Middle Keys are composed of a thin coral faces that extends only a few hundred feet seaward of the Keys.

Reef facies give way to mudstone facies within a few hundred feet seaward of the Keys.

Reef facies give way to mudstone facies within a few yard of shore on the Florida Bay side of the Keys.

On the seaward side of the Keys, beneath Hawk Channel and white bank, the Pleistocene limestone is a mixed grainstone, packstone, and wackstone facies.

Corals are rare or absent. The Pleistocene limestone beneath the outer reefs 4 to 5 miles offshore, however, consists of reef facies with the same coral fauna as that found on Key Largo.

This pattern of two major reef-facies belts separated by a 2-to 4-mile-wide belt of grainstone facies may have as yet undetermined effects on groundwater circulation beneath the Florida Reef Tract. Grainstone is approximately an order of magnitude less permeable than the coralline Key largo facies.

V. The Q3 surface, a major subsurface unconformity thought to form an effective confining zone elsewhere in south Florida, was not detected in wells drilled more than one mile from shore.

This unconformity, however, was detected in all wells drilled on or near the Keys.

What was found to be a more effective and widespread conforming layer is the Holocene sediment deposited on the Pleistocene limestone during the past 6,000 to 7,000 years.

These relatively impermeable sediments are extensive, forming a belt up to 5 miles wide beginning about 0.5 miles offshore.

Holocene sediments generally consist of low-permeability lime mud just above the Pleistocene surface, overlain by more permeable carbonate sands and reefs.

Leakage of ground water by tidal pumping is not likely to occur through lime-mud-dominated areas such as Hawk Channel but is likely to occur through isolated porous and permeable Holocene reefs situated on Pleistocene limestone highs, and in places where Holocene sediment does not cover the limestone bedrock.

Leakage is therefore limited to: 1) a shallow- water 0.5-mile-wide nearshore belt of exposed Key Largo limestone. 2) Holocene patch reefs, which grow on mud-free topographic rock highs, and 3) along the seaward side of the outermost reef in 35 to 65 ft (10-20m) of water, where Holocene reef and sediment accumulations are thin or absent.

IV. This study did not address direct measurements of lateral groundwater movement or a hydrologic mechanism for transplanting hypersaline groundwater away from the Florida Keys.

More recent work, however (Halley et al., 1994), shows that sea level in Florida Bay is higher on the Atlantic side of the Keys more than 50% of the time.

Higher sea level on the bay side of the Keys provides a potential groundwater flow towards the Atlantic most of the time.

Use of tracers (dyes or harmless bacteriological tracers) injected into the center of tightly spaced clusters of monitoring wells is a simple way to ascertain the net direction and rate of groundwater movement is needed for prediction and modeling efforts in the future.

Applied & Environmental Microbiology: Viral Tracer Studies Indicate Contamination Of Marine Waters By Sewage Disposal Practices In Key Largo, Florida by J. Paul, et. al.

http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/61/6/2230

John H. Paul, Joan B. Rose,
Jordan Brown, Eugene A. Shinn,
Steven Miller, and
Samuel R. Farrah

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Jun 1995, 2230-2234, Vol 61, No. 6 1995, American Society for Microbiology ABSTRACT

Domestic wastewater disposal practices in the Florida Keys are primarily limited to on-site disposal systems such as septic tanks, injection wells, and illegal cesspits. Poorly treated sewage is thus released into the highly porous surface subsurface Key Largo Matrix.

To investigate the fate and transport of sewage in the subsurface environment and the potential for contamination of marine surface waters, we employed bacteriophages IO HSIC-1 from the septic tank to adjacent surface canal waters and outstanding marine waters occurred in as little as 11 and 23 hours, respectively.

Transport of the Salmonella phage PRD! from the simulated injection well to a canal adjacent to the injection site occurred in 11.2 hours.

Estimated rates of migration of viral tracers ranged from 0.57 to 24.2 m/r over 500-fold greater than flow rates measured previously by subsurface flow meters in similar environments.

These results suggest that current on-site disposal practices can lead to contamination of the subsurface marine waters in the Keys.

Limnology & Oceanography: Nutrient Thresholds For Eutrophication And Macroalgal Overgrowth Of Coral Reefs In Jamaica And Southeast Florida by B.E. Lapointe

Nutrient Thresholds

Brian E. Lapointe
Director, Florida Keys Programs
Division of Marine Science
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution

Limnology & Oceanography 42(5, part 2) 1997 p.1119-1131.  1997

ABSTRACT

Some scientists have speculated that recent dramatic macroalgal overgrowth of fringing coral reefs on the north coast of Jamaica resulted primarily from reduced grazing due to overfishing and die-off of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum and dismissed entirely the possible role of eutrophication.

My study tested the alternative hypothesis that nutrient enrichment was the primary factor causing the spectacular macroalgal blooms that recently developed on reefs at Discovery Bay, Jamaica, and Palm Beach County, FL.

In both locations, groundwater discharges contributed to elevated water column DIN and SRP concentrations that exceeded nutrient thresholds (-uM DIN, O.1 uM SRP) for eutrophication on coral reefs.

At Discovery Bay, DIN and SRP concentrations ranged from 5 uM and 0.12 uM on the fore reef to 28 uM and 0.33 uM around the near shore springs, respectively.

High seawater DIN:SRP ratios (33.1 – 100:1), and macroalgal alkaline phosphatase activity [APA; 20 to 90 uM SRP released (g dry wt)-1 h-1] and tissue C:P (956:1) and N:P ratios (45:1) indicated P-limited productivity at Discovery Bay, which was corroborated by experimental studies where P-enrichment significantly increased Pmax of the shallow water opportunistic chlorophyte Chaetomorpha linum.

Recent increases in SRP concentrations of the fore reef at Discovery Bay above 0.1 uM, combined with the physical disturbance of Hurricane Allen in 1980, explains the increased standing crop biomass of Sargassum polyceratium and other macroalgae that now dominate this habitat.

In Florida, DIN and SRP concentrations ranged from 0.75 uM and 0.13 uM to 3.44 and 0.33 um on deep reefs (20 to 30 m) around blooms of Codium isthmocladum,, respectively.

Lower seawater DIN:SRP ratios (<15:1) and macroalgae APA [<20 uM SRP released (g dry wt)-1 h-1] and tissue N:P ratios suggested N-limited productivity, which was also confirmed experimentally where effects of N-enrichment significantly increased a, the photosynthetic efficiency under low irradiance.

Tissue d 15N ratios of C. isthmocladum ranged from +10.0 to 12.0 0/00 during the summer bloom, indicating waste-water-contaminated groundwaters as the Nitrogen source supporting algal growth.

These results are consistent with other case studies of eutrophication on coral reefs and refute recent speculations that reduced herbivory was the primary factor causing dramatic macroalgal overgrowth of coral reefs in Jamaica.

American Zoologist: Quantification of Loss & Change in Floridian Reef Coral Populations by J.W. Porter, O.W. Meier

http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/6/625

American Zoologist 1992 32(6):625-640; doi:10.1093/icb/32.6.625 1992.  The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology

James W. Porter And Ouida W. Meier
Department of Zoology, University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia 30602

SYNOPSIS

Six coral reef locations between Miami and Key West were marked with stainless steel stakes and rephotographed periodically between 1984 and 1991.   The monitored areas included two photostations in the Looe Key National Marine Sanctuary, two photostations in the Biscayne National Park.   Stations were monitored for species number, percent cover, and species diversity of the scleractinian and hydrozoan stony corals.   Monitoring began in 1984 for photostations in the National Marine Sanctuaries and in 1989 for stations in the National Park.

All six areas lost coral species between the initial survey year and 1991. Survey areas lost between one and four species; these losses constituted between 13% and 29% of their species richness. Five of the six areas lost live coral cover.  Based upon photographs taken repeatedly at these locations, net losses ranged between 7.3% and 43.9%.

In the one station showing an increase in coral cover, the increase was only for the canopy branches of Acropora palmata ; understory branches of this same species lost surface area at the same rate as canopy branches gained area.   For most of the common species, there was a reduction in the total number of living colonies in the community, and a diminution in the number of large, mature colonies.

Mortality of this magnitude is often associated with hurricane damage, but in this survey the losses occurred during a period without catastrophic storms.   Sources of mortality identifiable in the photographs include (1) black band disease and (2) bleaching; other potential sources of mortality are also considered.

We conclude, for our survey areas, that loss rates of this magnitude cannot be sustained for protracted periods if the coral community is to persist in a configuration resembling historical coral reef community structure in the Florida Keys.