Category Archives: Home Page Posts

Home Page Posts

Florida Coastal & Ocean Conference 2010: An Ocean State of Mind

FLORIDA COASTAL AND OCEAN COALITION www.flcoastalandocean.org
    
Registration Live
The Florida Coastal and Ocean Conference Registration is now LIVE!

Please visit the Coalition website to register
Conference Agenda
The Florida Coastal and Ocean Conference: 2010
“An Ocean State of Mine”

Thursday – June 17

4:00-6:00pm Conference Check-in and Registration

6:00-7:30pm Welcome Reception- Florida Coastal and Ocean Coalition
Friday – June 18

7:30-8:30am Conference Check-in and Registration

8:30-8:45 Welcome and Opening Remarks

8:45-9:00am Keynote Speaker

9:00-10:30am Plenary Session I: Ocean Policy, Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning and Governance

10:30-10:45am Coffee Break

10:45- 12:00pm Breakout Sessions
Ocean Policy, Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning, and Governance

12:00-1:30pm Lunch with Media Panel: “Covering Ocean and Coastal Issues in a Changing Media World”

1:30-3:00pm Concurrent Sessions
Session 1 “How do we get to coastal numeric nutrient criteria from here?”
Moderator: George Jones, Indian Riverkeeper
Session 2 Reef Fish Catch: “Allocation & Accountability”
Moderator: Paul Johnson, Reef Relief
Session 3 Florida’s Coasts: “Shifting Sands”
Moderator: Gary Appelson, Caribbean Conservation Corp. & Sea Turtle Survival League

3:00-3:15pm Coffee Break

3:15-4:45pm Plenary Session II: Review and Wrap up of day’s work with recommendations forward.
Moderator: Ericka D’Avanzo, Surfrider Foundation
We are continually updating our speaker list, check back with us regularly

Thanks,
The Florida Coastal and Ocean Coalition

David Helvarg’s new book “Saved by the Sea–a Love Story with Fish” & tour dates

http://www.bluefront.org/files/saved_by_the_sea.php

Saved by the Sea Tour

Blue Frontier Campaign President David Helvarg’s latest ocean book, a memoir titled Saved by the Sea – A Love Story with Fish will be released by St. Martin’s Press on May 11 2010

SavedByTheSeaDesigns-6-1

Some comments to date:

“Helvarg offers us a glimpse not only of his own amazing and often heart-rending adventures in and around the ocean but also gives insight into the human condition…A great read from an outstanding writer.”
–Philippe Cousteau, Ocean Explorer

“Read Saved by the Sea for pleasure, read it for adventure, read it because it conveys the gift of being allowed to slip into David Helvarg’s world and view the ocean, and humankind, with profound new understanding. But beware: This book has the power to change the way you think about the world, about yourself, and the future of humankind.”
–Sylvia Earle, Ocean Explorer; Author, The World is Blue

” In this powerful story of love, loss, and resolve, Helvarg bares his heart and takes us through his life and across the oceans, letting us see that the antidote to all is simply to have something to believe in, and a cause to serve.”
–Carl Safina, Author, Song for the Blue Ocean

Blue Frontier Campaign will be sending David on a ‘Saved by the Sea’ tour this spring and summer from Boston to San Diego to Seattle and points beyond. The hope is to not only do bookstore appearances but to work with seaweed groups and organizations to stage book parties and media events that can also highlight the work they do every day to protect and restore healthy oceans and coastal communities from sea to shining sea. A dozen blue groups have partnered to date.

Below is the schedule so far:

Boston, MA     May 10-11 (Mon, Tue)
May 11  New England Aquarium 7PM

Mystic Seaport, CT     May 12 (Wed.)
Blunt Building – 6:30 PM

New London, CT     May 13 (Thur.)
U.S. Coast Guard Academy – Lunch Talk

Providence, RI     May 14 (Fri.)
University of Rhode Island – Bayside Campus – Noon
Books on the Square – 7PM

New York City, NY     May 15 – 19 (Sat. – Wed.)
Event TBA

Washington D.C.     May 20 – 25 (Thur. – Wed)
May 21  Politics & Prose Fri.  – 7PM
May 25  NOAA Library, Silver Spring MD – Noon

Denver/Boulder, CO     May 26 – 29 (Thur. – Sat.)
May 26  Ocean First Divers, Boulder – 7PM
May 27  Tattered Cover Bookstore, Denver – 7:30 PM

S.F. Bay Area, CA     May 31 – June 2 (Mon. – Wed.)
May 31  Coppersfield Books, Petaluma  – 7PM
June 1  Keppler’s Books, Palo Alto – 7:30 PM
June 2  Book Passages, Marin – 7PM

San Diego, CA     June 3 – 5 (Thur. – Sat.)
June 3  Warwicks Bookstore, La Jolla  – 7:30 PM

Los Angeles, CA     June 6-8 (Sun. – Tue.)
June 8  Event World Ocean Day  TBA

Monterey/Santa Cruz, CA     June 10 – 12 (Thur. – Sat.)
Bookshop Santa Cruz – June 10 (Thur.) – 7:30

Portland, OR     June 14 – 15 (Mon. – Tue.)
Powell’s Bookstore Monday June 14 – 7PM

Seattle, WA     June 16 – 19 (Wed. – Sat.)
Elliott Bay Bookstore –  7PM Thur. June 17 JUNE 17

Petaluma, CA    June 24 (Thur.)
Coast Guard Training Center

Honolulu, HI     June 28 – July 4 (Sun. – Sat.)
Events TBA

New York, NY    July 8 (Thurs.)
South St. Seaport Museum 6:30 PM

New Jersey   July 9 (Fri.)
Clean Ocean Action – TBA

San Francisco, CA     July 14
SF Main Public Library – 6 – 7:30 PM

Long Beach, CA     July 28
Aquarium of the Pacific talk – 7PM

If your group would like to work on the tour, do an independent book event or have David speak about how he was, ‘Saved by the Sea,’ please contact us at info@bluefront.org

Alternet.org: What to do when the current climate change legislation threatens to do more harm than good.

http://www.alternet.org/story/146489/what_to_do_when_the_current_climate_change_legislation_threatens_to_do_more_harm_than_good_

Alternet.org

Unfortunately, when it comes to climate change legislation, all signs are pointing to system failure.
April 15, 2010  | 
 
If that plucky, animated, singing scrap of paper from Schoolhouse Rock!–“(I’m Just a) Bill”–were around today, he’d be begging us to keep him out of the Senate. That’s where good ideas go to get their teeth knocked out, to get fattened with pork and disfigured with loopholes, coming out the other end as Frankenstein versions of the initiatives they once were. We’re left asking, Is this creature something we can live with and improve over time, as was the case with healthcare reform? Or is the result so hopelessly compromised that it ought never see the light of day?

Unfortunately, when it comes to climate change legislation, all signs are pointing to system failure. Congress urgently needs to pass a comprehensive climate bill, but the current Senate proposal, spearheaded by senators Kerry, Lieberman and Graham, threatens to do more harm than good. It is not only inadequate to the task of curbing climate change; it could curtail the power of the EPA and state governments to regulate greenhouse gases–the best avenues for action in the face of Congress’s failures.

The cap-and-trade bill that Obama originally proposed was by no means perfect. It did not even try to meet the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, what the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says is minimally necessary from industrialized nations to avoid a chain-reaction climate catastrophe. But it did include a key mechanism that environmentalists regard as essential for cap and trade to work effectively: it would have auctioned off 100 percent of carbon credits, rather than giving them away, thereby raising funds that could be used to offset the burden of higher energy prices on low- and middle-income families and be invested in renewable energy.

By the time the 1,427-page Waxman-Markey bill squeaked through the House last June, however, those crucial elements of the Obama proposal had been eviscerated. Waxman-Markey would sell only 15 percent of carbon credits at an initial auction, with the rest doled out to polluters, free. Waxman-Markey also includes other concessions to the fossil fuel industry–most alarming, stripping the EPA of much of its regulatory power over greenhouse gases (see Christian Parenti, “The Case for EPA Action,” in this issue).

The outlook in the Senate is, if anything, worse. At this writing, its final details have not been released, but from early reports it appears that the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham bill would keep and extend the worst aspects of Waxman-Markey: inadequate emissions-reduction targets (only 3 percent below 1990 levels by 2020), too many free permits and too many allowances for carbon offsets, which are of dubious value in fighting climate change (see Heather Rogers, “Offset Buyers Beware,” in this issue).

Kerry-Lieberman-Graham would by-pass an economywide cap-and-trade system, opting instead for a bundle of separate energy bills that would slowly phase in emissions reductions sector by sector. Some of these pieces of legislation may pass; others may fail; all are ripe for gaming by corporate lobbies. Kerry-Lieberman-Graham would also skew subsidies in the wrong direction, throwing billions at “clean coal” technologies, nuclear power plants and offshore drilling, a questionable gambit favored by the Obama administration to garner support from Republicans and representatives from oil-, gas- and coal-producing states.
Perhaps most troubling, Kerry-Lieberman-Graham would not only gut the EPA of its regulatory power but could also pre-empt regulations on greenhouse gases from states and municipalities. This would undo the considerable progress made by states like California–which have pioneered emissions reductions for automobiles, and regional cap-and-trade systems–and thwart the efforts of cities and towns to require developers and businesses to adopt clean energy technologies.

In the face of such maneuvers, some green groups, like Bill McKibben’s 350.org, are pushing instead for the CLEAR Act, written by senators Maria Cantwell and Susan Collins. The CLEAR Act’s cap-and-dividend system, which works by capping CO2-producing fossil fuels at the source or point of import, is an elegant idea; but its mandatory emissions targets are weaker than what’s needed. It covers only CO2 (not all greenhouse gases), and one of its prime virtues–that it’s just forty pages long!–means that it leaves a lot of vital details out of the picture. Still, it doesn’t pre-empt the EPA or state regulations, and its leanness means that it’s not laden with pork and industrial giveaways.
Between the two, the CLEAR Act is preferable, on the grounds that it would do less harm and possibly as much or more good. But let’s be very clear: our legislative process–which allows parochial short-term interests and massive corporate lobbies to undermine the long-term common interests–has proven shockingly inadequate to the monumental task before us: the preservation of the conditions of life for much of the human species. For that we will need action on more than just the Congressional front. The vigorous grassroots movement to halt the construction of new coal-fired plants–which Robert S. Eshelman profiles in “Cracking Big Coal,” in this issue–offers a model of what determined, savvy activists can accomplish in the absence of national leadership. But we also need action from the executive branch, from states, cities, businesses and citizens. As it stands, the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham bill would vitiate many of these forums while strengthening the position of the nuclear, natural gas and coal industries. For that reason, we regretfully urge its defeat.

San Francisco Bay Guardian: Drowned out–Endangered whales may be threatened by noisy side-effect of globalization

http://www.sfbg.com/2010/04/13/drowned-out

The reason I posted this is because it has implications for dolphins as well as whales.  Dolphins are found in the same tropical waters as coral reefs.  DeeVon

San Francisco Bay Guardian
Drowned out
GREEN ISSUE:
Endangered whales may be threatened by a noisy side-effect of globalization
04.13.10 – 4:24 pm | Rebecca Bowe | (0)

Ships create a two-pronged threat to whales, creating noise pollution and sometimes ramming them to death
PHOTO BY JOHN CALAMBOKIDIS/CASCADIAN RESEARCH COLLECTIVE
rebeccab@sfbg.com
GREEN ISSUE The tiny, rigid-hull inflatable boats that researchers at Scripps Institution of Oceanography use for whale tagging are a mere fraction of the size of the blue whales they are deployed to search for. But Scripps PhD candidate Megan McKenna says there’s no reason to worry about the mammoth creatures – which can weigh as many tons as 27 elephants put together – bumping up against the boat when she reaches overboard with a pole to tag them.

“They’re just pretty mellow, I guess,” McKenna says. “There’s no flailing or anything. Some barely even notice that we’re there.” For two summers, she’s ventured out in pursuit of the endangered whales, popping short-term monitoring tags on them to learn how they behave when massive cargo shipping vessels motor past.

It’s an important question for a couple of reasons. Government funding was provided for the Scripps study after two blue whales were struck and killed by commercial shipping vessels in 2007, tragedies magnified by the fact that the marine mammals are still struggling for survival. If even two die in such collisions every few years, the entire species could be imperiled, McKenna says.

At the same time, a less-understood phenomenon has marine scientists worried that the deep-blue giants’ survival is being undermined by a subtler problem, that Jackie Dragon of San Francisco-based Pacific Environment likens to “death by a thousand cuts.” Noise generated by whirring ship propellers registers at the same frequency as the low tones whales use to communicate and forage for food, and researchers are concerned that the constant interruption is affecting their ability to engage in basic survival behavior.

Put together with an array of concerns including chemical pollution, marine debris, over-fishing, and ocean acidification, noise pollution is just coming onto the sonar of local marine sanctuary councils and federal environmental agencies, and proposed solutions are only in the fledgling stages.

Pacific Environment is one of several environmental organizations advocating for shipping vessels to travel at slower speeds, a quieter practice that also reduces the chances of hitting a whale. Despite growing evidence that noise pollution and ship strikes pose big problems for the planet’s largest mammals, it’s likely to be an uphill battle in an growing global industry where time is money, and on-time delivery is paramount.

Endangered whales favor the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank sanctuaries, not far from San Francisco, so Pacific Environment has chartered a catamaran to take ecologically-minded whale watchers out to what Dragon dubs the “Yosemites of the sea.” Using hydrophones, they capture the deep, rumbling whale calls. They also pick up noise generated by commercial ships, whose designated lanes cut directly through the protected areas.

Under just the right ocean conditions, the low, eerie mating call of a male blue whale off the coast of California can be heard by a female off the coast of Hawaii. “That just has to do with the physics of sound in the ocean,” McKenna explains. “They’re vocal animals. You can think of sound in the ocean as our vision. Sound travels so much better in water than light does, so it’s really an acoustic environment that they’re living in.”
McKenna is working with whale researchers John Calambokidis of the Cascadia Research Collective and John Hildebrand of Scripps Institution. While they’ve observed that some whales linger at the surface longer than usual after a ship has passed, leaving them vulnerable to a strike, there are no conclusive results as of yet.
To explain the noise impacts, Dragon uses an analogy of trying to communicate in a crowded bar where it’s difficult to hear. “In the ocean, sound is king,” she says. “This chronic, noisy, foggy environment … has a masking effect. It might mean whales will not be able to navigate correctly, or may not be able to communicate with mates or offspring.”
The Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary supports a rare concentration of blue whales, partly because the water is rich in nutrients, biodiversity, and tiny, shrimp-like creatures called krill. Blue whales and endangered humpbacks forage there from April through November, the colossal blues consuming an astounding 4 tons of krill each day.

At an April 8 joint meeting between the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank marine sanctuary advisory councils, the groups discussed creating a working group – bringing together stakeholders from the U.S. Coast Guard, shipping industries, and others – to establish a set of recommendations for how to regulate noise pollution in the sanctuaries.
“The purpose is to better understand the issue from the standpoint of the sanctuary,” explains Lance Morgan, who chairs the Cordell Bank council. “Ideally, we’d produce a report that says, here’s what we think the issues are.”

Yet Morgan acknowledges that it won’t be easy to get the federal government to impose new sanctuary regulations since there are still so many outstanding questions. “We’re learning a lot about the acoustic environment,” he says. One concern is whether whales are actually able to perceive the sound of the giant shipping vessels, he notes, since the environment has become so noisy. If they can’t hear the ships, they’re at a much higher risk of collision. “We certainly know we can drown out whale calls in certain situations,” he says, “but what does that mean in the long term?”

There are around 14,000 blue whales left across the entire watery globe, according to the most optimistic estimates, just a sliver of the estimated 300,000 that lived before they were nearly harpooned to extinction during a ruthless whaling era. Scientists are encouraged that their numbers have climbed since the mid-1960s when they were listed as endangered.

Yet even with this mild success story as a backdrop, there is growing concern about potential long-term effects of underwater industrial noise. Navy sonar, military air guns, and blasts from seismic surveys all contribute to the problem at varying frequencies. The collective din of ocean noise has doubled every decade since the 1950s, and the shipping business is only expected to grow.

Maersk, the world’s largest shipping company, runs weekly container ships from Hong Kong to ports in Oakland and Long Beach, a journey lasting more than two weeks. Getting the goods there on time is “the most important thing to our customers,” says Lee Kindberg, the company’s environment director.

The container ships arrive crammed full of everything from electronics – which require special climate-controlled containers – to clothing, bath products, household items, and pharmaceuticals. Perishable items are transported in refrigerators, consuming a third more energy and powered by auxiliary engines. Up to 8,000 containers can be packed onto a single ship, and the average vessel size has expanded around 20 percent in the past five years. More than 90 percent of the world’s traded goods are transported by water, with shipments on container vessels increasingly rapidly.

If ever there was an icon for globalization, and all that the buy-local and sustainability movements rail against, it would be a diesel-powered container ship transporting heavily packaged stuff halfway across the globe.

Special thanks to Richard Charter