Category Archives: Home Page Posts

Home Page Posts

The Atlantic: Why Young Environmentalists Still Have Hope

By Billy Parish

When it comes to climate change, it’s not surprising that many millennials have settled into a fatalistic stupor. But there are ways to make a difference — and they’re already working.

 

Ten years ago, I was between my sophomore and junior years at Yale, and on a journey that would profoundly alter the course of my life. I was spending the summer in India, and had decided to hike to the Gaumukh glacier, the source of the Ganges River that rests at the far end of a massive ice sheet deep that extends into the Himalayas.

On the way up, my guide, Anand, and I encountered a barefoot man in an orange robe–a reminder of the fact that we were headed to the holiest place in India. The Ganges accommodates some 450 million people who come to its banks to drink, eat, farm, bathe, and worship. For thousands of years, the great river has been at the center of Indian political, economic, and spiritual life.

Closer to the glacier, we encountered a different kind of sight: a white plastic tent with a satellite dish beside it. Nearby, we found a scientist sitting on a boulder. A quarter century earlier, he told us, we would have been standing on the glacier. It had been retreating for years. As soon as 2030, he said, Gaumukh could disappear altogether.

That fall, I took a leave from college, determined to do something about the insanity of global warming. I would never return, choosing instead to co-found the Energy Action Coalition and grow it into the world’s largest youth advocacy organization working on the climate crisis. As we won thousands of small victories, getting cities, college campuses, and companies to begin reducing their carbon footprints, I and those around me felt empowered — confident that we would prevail in the greatest challenge of our generation.

Then came 2008. After the election, we saw an opportunity to win both federal climate legislation and to secure an international climate deal in Copenhagen. When both went down in flames, many climate activists (myself included) fell into a kind of depression.

Fast forward to 2012. We’re living through the warmest year in American history. Wildfires and droughts are plaguing the West, prompting experts to warn of a looming food crisis, and Bill McKibben’s tour-de-force Rolling Stone piece “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math” has been viewed 1.2 million times in two weeks. The listervs I’m on are filling up with huge threads with subject lines like, “I’m scared.”

What happened? What do we do now? I and many other members of the millennial generation have spent the past few years developing answers to these questions. The good news is that we now know a great deal about what works, and we know what we need to do.

First, it’s important to recognize that this not only a dangerous time, but also a time of immense opportunity. We are living in a world of dueling exponential curves. On one hand, there are the hockey stick slopes, the terrifying and skyrocketing lines of environmental degradation and carbon. But not far behind is another wave of fast-growing curves representing a solution set that could sustainably feed, shelter, and power the planet.

In his Rolling Stone piece, McKibben mentions that Germany recently met nearly half its noonday power demand with solar energy. What he didn’t mention was that as recently as 2000, solar power comprised only 0.01 percent of Germany’s power supply. A similar story of renewable energy growth has played out around the world. Late last year, the International Energy Agency came out with a stunning revision of its forecast for the future energy mix of the planet, saying solar could produce most of the world’s power in less than 50 years. In the U.S., the rate of uptake of wind and solar technologies has blown expert predictions out of the water.

Taking note of new realities, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory recently issued a statement that would have been unimaginable five years ago: “Renewable electricity generation from technologies that are commercially available today is more than adequate to supply 80% of total U.S. electricity generation in 2050 while meeting electricity demand on an hourly basis in every region of the country.”

So how do we, as a generation that will be grappling with these issues far into the future, ensure that the good curves win out?

1. Support local fights to keep fossil fuels in the ground

McKibben calls for turning our full attention to fighting fossil fuel companies. To this I would add that we need to double down on local campaigns targeted at specific mining or energy development projects. Why? Because they work. On the ground, surrounded by friends and family, fighting both for our planet and the places we love, we’re already finding our power.

With little fanfare, grassroots groups around the country have turned the tide on fossil fuel development. They have been supported by smart national groups like the Sierra Club, 350.org, and the Energy Action Coalition. To take one example, the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign has supported volunteers across the country as they’ve successfully fought to halt two thirds of all proposals for new coal-fired power plants put forth since 2001. The campaign is now aiming to close all of the nation’s 530 existing coal plants by 2030.

Going forward, special attention needs to be paid to the areas with the biggest concentrations of hydrocarbons — places like Wyoming’s Powder River Basin, Alberta’s Tar Sands, Appalachia, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and the Navajo and Hopi Nations’ Black Mesa. There are dozens of well-organized groups on the ground, many of them indigenous led, that are starved for funding. Focused efforts to fund these groups and help them develop and finance clean economic alternatives could go a long way towards keeping the fossil fuels they live on top of under the ground, where they belong.

2. Keep funding innovation

We must also ensure that the government continues to back energy innovation. In a recent NY Times piece, David Leonhardt highlighted government-driven clean energy innovation as the silver lining of the past decade. Even while efforts to put a price on carbon have failed, smart funding policies at every level of government have been remarkably successful in building out a clean energy system. Yet the same funding that has driven this build out is now drying up.

As Leonhardt notes, government funding is critical for clean energy because the basic research that has already brought down the cost of wind and solar, and which stands to create the next generation of breakthrough technologies, is often initially unprofitable. Similarly, a 2011 report from the American Energy Innovation Council argued for a strong government role in driving energy innovation. “We know the federal government has a vital role to play in energy innovation…. There are no excuses,” write the authors. “If the United States fails … we will have lost an opportunity to lead in what is arguably the largest and most pervasive technology sector in the world.”

What is particularly notable about this report is the list of names affixed to it. It includes some of the most prominent entrepreneurs and capitalists of our time–people like Bill Gates, John Doerr, Ursula Burns, Norman Augustine, and Jeff Immelt. Titans of industry in every industry but fossil fuel are ready for America to take part in the clean energy revolution. They know it’s going to require strong government support. That means it’s going to take the support of all of us.

3. Lead by example

Speaking at a New York League of Conservation Voters annual gala fundraiser several years ago, I asked the audience members how many had gotten energy-efficiency work done on their homes, or powered some area of lives with renewable energy. Fewer than 5 in 500 raised their hands. It’s not enough to fight our current system, or to develop next generation technologies — we have to rapidly deploy every solution we already have. And we do have many of the tools we need. It’s time to start to picking them up and build.

On the renewable energy front, leading by example means delving into ways to reduce our own dirty energy footprints. When the climate debate first heated up, solutions in this area pretty much came down to “change your light bulbs.” This is no longer the case. Declining costs and the invention of “solar leases” have made it possible for millions of Americans to go solar with little or no upfront cost. Many more are getting involved with community-scale renewable energy projects. Still others are investing in energy retrofits that will pay back huge financial dividends over time.

It’s also essential to start putting our collective savings toward building a clean energy future. Many of us invest the money we save for our children’s futures in funds that are heavy on the same companies that are putting their future at risk. Again, while we didn’t used to have many options on this front, the world is changing fast. With a little thought, it’s possible to do well for your family while also doing good for your community and the planet. We need leaders in every walk of life to prove this principle.

So, do the most revolutionary thing you can: build. Take your money out of the banks and stocks that support coal and invest it in impact funds, credit unions, renewable energy projects, and bonds projects for your community. You’ll find that many dedicated people have spent the better part of the past few decades building tools that make it easy. And put up a solar array on your own roof, or join together with the people building a community wind project. States without good community energy laws are becoming fewer and further between; across the country, entrepreneurs are building businesses to meet the demand they already see for renewable energy.

Fight, fund, build. It’s that simple–and that difficult. We may be young and scared, but we have power. We are making progress. Now is not the time to slow down.

 

Special thanks to Mark Spalding, The Ocean Foundation

Coral-list: New Identification Guide for Coral Reef Sponges at Glover’s Atoll Belize

Dear coral-listers

I would like to draw your attention about a picture identification guide for common coral reef sponges of Glover’s Atoll Belize, produced by the Wildlife Conservation Society – Belize.

Although proper identification often requires microscopic examination, the images herein may help you get close and provide a starting point.

This guide may be copied and used freely for educational purposes from:

http://www.marinespatialecologylab.org/resources/sponges/

http://www.gloversreef.org/picture_guides_to_organisms.html

Cheers

Manuel González-Rivero

Manuel González-Rivero
Postdoctoral Fellow

Coral Reef Ecosystems Laboratory
The University of Queensland
Tel  +61 7 334 69576 | Fax +61 7 3365 4755
Skype nano_magr | W www.coralreefecosystems.org

Sierra Club: Don’t pump sugar’s polluted water into Lake Okeechobee

We must not begin backpumping dirty water into Lake Okeechobee again. Nor can we afford to avoid cleaning the water prior to releasing it downstream to run through the Everglades to the coral reefs of the Florida Keys. That mistake in the 80’s  led to massive coral losses on the Florida reef tract.  DV
by Sierra Club’s Everglades Team
August 8, 2012
Dear South Florida Water Management District Governing Board members,
Thank you for looking into alternatives that could provide water to the Caloosahatchee River.
More than a century of drainage, channelization and diking plus climate-induced drought has led us to the current dilemma. However, backward pumping polluted water is not the solution.
The Sierra Club, the country’s oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization, opposes any plan to pump agricultural pollution into Lake Okeechobee.
Under the plan to boost water levels, untreated EAA run-off, laden with nitrogen, phosphorus, pesticides and herbicides, would be pumped backwards into Lake Okeechobee.
According to a recent South Florida Sun-Sentinel report, the pollutants “could lead to a dead zone in the lake, resulting in algae blooms and low oxygen levels that kill fish, aquatic insects and disrupt other aspects of the lake’s food chain.”
Polluted runoff would run through the heart of the City of Belle Glade and be pumped into Lake Okeechobee at Torry Island, home to the community’s public fishing area and recreational space. Backpumping would be detrimental to the local public’s enjoyment of the area and would all but eliminate any tourism in this community.
In addition, pumping water into Lake Okeechobee diverts water critically needed in the Everglades, water that the State of Florida is proposing to spend an additional $890 million to clean. Instead of cleaning the water and allowing it to flow south to the Everglades naturally, the District would force the water back north, cutting off a vital water supply to the water-starved wetlands and native species. Diverting water that would otherwise go to the Everglades and replenish the aquifer would reduce water available to Southeast Florida’s urbanized areas.
The Sierra Club supports supplying more water to the Caloosahatchee by modifying the adaptive protocols to eliminate the tributary hydrologic conditions restraint, prioritizing the Lake Hicpochee project, expediting the C-43 reservoir, and greater water conservation measures.
Taking these steps – not backpumping – will protect the Greater Everglades, as well as the people and the economies that depend upon a healthy ecosystem.
Again, thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Ullman,
Sierra Club Everglades Team
Sierra Club South Florida/Everglades Office, 2600 SW 3rd Ave., 5th Floor, Miami, FL 33129, 305-860-9888

Future Forum: Can Coral Reefs Survive the next century? Video by ABC

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/abcnews24/programs/future-forum/

The Great Barrier Reef and the other great coral reefs are the largest living structures on the planet and among the world’s most diverse ecosystems. It has been estimated that more than 250 million people depend on the world’s coral reefs to provide their income, sustenance and livelihoods. Now the triple threat of overfishing, pollution and climate change is threatening the existence of many coral reefs, with some suggesting that up to a fifth of the world’s reefs have already been destroyed.

So how can we ensure the continued survival of the remaining coral reefs? Are marine parks the only solution? And while the world’s population continues to expand, how can we meet the growing food and energy demands while still protecting fragile coral reefs?

Leading experts and practioners meet in Cairns to debate these issues in front of an informed audience.

The Future Forum is presented by ABC News 24 in partnership with James Cook University.

Sierra Club Florida News: National Environmental CEO’s Ask EPA to Reject Florida’s Nutrient Standards

American Rivers ● Clean Water Action ● Earthjustice ● Environment America ● Friends of the Earth ● Izaak Walton League of America ● League of Conservation Voters ● National Parks Conservation Association ● National Wildlife Federation ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Physicians for Social Responsibility ● Sierra Club
July 19, 2012
The Honorable Lisa Jackson, Administrator     The Honorable Nancy Sutley, Chair
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency             White House Council on Environmental Quality
Ariel Rios, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.        722 Jackson Place N.W.
Washington, DC 20004                                       Washington, DC 20506
Dear Administrator Jackson and Chair Sutley,
As leaders of the nation’s largest environmental organizations concerned with public health and clean water, we write you on behalf of our millions of members and supporters to urge you to protect Florida’s waters from toxic algae outbreaks and disapprove Florida’s proposed standards that fail to achieve that goal. This is both a regional and national imperative, as nitrogen and phosphorous pollution from sewage treatment plants, fertilizer and manure runoff, and other sources foul not only Florida’s waters but also rivers, streams, lakes, and beaches across the country.
Passage of the Clean Water Act forty years ago was one of the most important and popular environmental achievements in our history, creating a legacy of cleaner water in the United States. The growing numbers of toxic algae outbreaks in Florida and beyond demonstrates that the job of ending the pollution of the nation’s waters is still far from complete.  In Florida, 70 percent of freshwater springs have nutrient concentrations at least 500 percent higher than historic background concentrations.   Just last month, Northern Florida’s Santa Fe River experienced it’s first ever massive algae bloom along the most popular canoeing section of the river. Last month, Glades, Hendy, and Lee counties all issued public health advisories warning the public to stay out of the algae infested waters of the Caloosahatchee River in the southwest part of the state.
Reducing nutrient pollution is a critically important issue for the environmental community in Florida and it has been a long fought battle with polluting industries and their friends in state government to address it. EPA must act to protect Florida’s waters from toxic algae outbreaks to avoid economic impacts in addition to the environmental ones. Tourism at Florida’s famous beaches is vulnerable if swimming means risking respiratory distress from red tide toxins. Waterfront property owners are faced with “Algae Alert” signs warning people not to swim in, drink, or eat fish from those waters, or even let their pets near the water. People who swam, fished, and went boating in these lakes, rivers, and streams as children are shocked by their current condition.
At issue today is whether EPA will approve Florida’s state standards. Governor Scott’s administration is asking EPA to approve state rules written for the polluting industries.  While the state claims to have adopted EPA-approvable rules, it has not.
We understand that a great deal of lobbying pressure is being applied to get EPA to approve Florida’s standards.  We urge that you do not. At a minimum, EPA must look carefully at whether the state’s rules will meet acceptable pollution limits and protect Florida’s waters.
As the 40th anniversary of the Clean Water Act approaches, EPA is asking the public “Water, Is It Worth It?”  We believe the answer in Florida and across the country is a resounding “Yes.”  EPA can demonstrate its commitment to clean water by ending toxic algae pollution in Florida.   We urge you to protect America’s legacy of clean water so that future generations may benefit fromthese important resources.  .

Thank you for your continued commitment to protecting our nation’s waters.
Respectfully,
Trip Van Noppen
President
Earthjustice
Wm. Robert Irvin
President and CEO
American Rivers
Margie Alt
Executive Director
Environment America
Michael Brune
Executive Director
Sierra Club
Robert Wendelgass
President and CEO
Clean Water Action
Erich Pica
President
Friends of the Earth
Frances Beinecke
President
Natural Resources Defense Council
Catherine Thomasson, MD
Executive Director
Physicians for Social Responsibility
Thomas C. Kiernan
President
National Parks Conservation Association
Larry J. Schweiger
President and CEO
National Wildlife Federation
David W. Hoskins
Executive Director
Izaak Walton League of America
Gene Karpinski
President
League of Conservation Voters