All posts by admin

Coralations: SEA DREAM CRUISE SHIPS REPORTED ANCHORING OFF USFWS REFUGE CAY of CULEBRITA…again

One of the Sea Dream ships left Ensonada Honda Sat., Dec 17th, 2011, but did not head directly to the USFWS Refuge Cay Saturday night.  We are not sure where it anchored over-night.

 

One of the vessels was reported anchored at the refuge cay on Sun., Dec 18th, 2011.  Based on yesterday’s report, it appears that despite the public out-cry, USFWS continues to issue federal permits for the Sea Dream Cruise Ships to disembark passengers on the public National Wildlife Refuge Cay of Culebrita.    There is no mooring or pier at the cay – only Critical Habitat listed sea grasses and corals.
Sea Dream markets the Culebrita stop as “off the beaten path” tourism – as this unsustainable brand of tourism beats Culebra’s corals and sea grasses to death.

 

The ships obviously cannot control wind direction and swing.  When not directly anchoring atop corals and sea grass, easterly and south eastery winds swing the boat so the stern faces the reef. As their huge propellors engage to make way –  sand and debris known as “prop wash” sand blast what’s left of these Culebrita corals.    The Sea Dream disembarks passengers to the cay off speeding zodiacs, and provides wave runners to passengers which disturb and threaten the Caribbeans few remaining sea turtles and manatees.  Photos of corals damaged as anchor passed over them were submitted to NOAA.  Like with the mud impacting the reefs of Flamenco Beach – the NOAA Restoration Center made a site visit but took no action.

 

But wait – there’s more….
Sea Dream captains are environmentally reckless throughout the Caribbean.  On Culebrita we have reported the Sea Dream vessels to the U.S. Coast Guard for reckless endangerment of their passengers as they anchor these vessels in waters marked on nautical charts as

 

Multiple written complaints have been issued to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. EPA, and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – all with jurisdictional authority to stop this permit, environmental impact and threat to passengers!

 

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

 
Piratas Playa Flamenco 
NOTICIAS – NEWS PLAYA FLAMENCO  
 
Primera Hora, lunes, 5 de diciembre de 2011
                       
(Online Google Translation) 
                                       Follow the Environmental Damage on Flamenco Beach
 
 
Primera Hora, jueves, 8 de diciembre de 2011

DRNA investigarla supuesto movimiento ilegal de terreno en Culebra

                        

English (Online Google Translation) 

                                        DNER investigate alleged illegal movement of land on Culebra

 

 

CONTACT INFORMATION: 

 

Edwin Muñiz,

Field Supervisor

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Boqueron Field Office

P.O. Box 491,

Boquerón, Puerto Rico 00622

Jack Arnold

Deputy Assistant Regional Director

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Regional Office

1975 Century Boulevard, Suite 400

Atlanta, Georgia 30345-3319

Lisamarie Carrubba

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Protected Resources

Caribbean Field Office

Cabo Rojo, PR 00622

 

Erik Hawk

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Protected Resources

Southeast Regional Office

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

 

Carl Soderberg, Director

U.S. EPA Region II

Caribbean Environmental Protection Division

Edif Centro Europa Apt 417

1492 Avenida Ponce de Leon

San Juan PR 00907-4127

 

Judith Enck

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA Region 2

290 Broadway

New York, NY 10007-1866

Seeking Your Input on the U.S. Open Government National Action Plan


On September 20, 2011, on the margins of the U.N. General Assembly, the President announced the U.S. Open Government National Action Plan.  The Plan was developed through a process that involved extensive consultations with external stakeholders, including a broad range of civil society groups and members of the private sector, to gather ideas on open government.  As we continue our work to implement the National Action Plan, we want your help.  Specifically, we’d like your input and recommendations on how to improve and help facilitate public participation – your participation – in government.
The United States committed to undertake 26 Open Government initiatives in the National Action Plan, and we are working to implement each of them now.  For example, the White House recently announced that Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar will be the senior U.S. official to lead implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, an effort to ensure that taxpayers receive every dollar due for extraction of our natural resources.  A major milestone was also reached in the development of an open government platform that will enable governments around the world to stand up their own open government data sites. And just last week, the President fulfilled a commitment made in the National Action Plan to begin a government-wide effort to reform and modernize records management policies and practices.
We are now requesting your assistance with one of the initiatives in the U.S. National Action Plan designed to promote public participation:
Develop Best Practices and Metrics for Public Participation. We will identify best practices for public participation in government and suggest metrics that will allow agencies to assess progress toward the goal of becoming more participatory. This effort will highlight those agencies that have incorporated the most useful and robust forms of public participation in order to encourage other agencies to learn from their examples.”
Given the focus of this initiative, we thought it would be most appropriate to invite you to provide input and ideas on best practices and metrics for public participation, including but not limited to suggestions and recommendations that address the following questions:
·         What are the appropriate measures for tracking and evaluating participation efforts in agency Open Government Plans?
·         What should be the minimum standard of good participation?
·         How should participation activities be compared across agencies with different programs, amounts of regulatory activity, budgets, staff sizes, etc.?
·         What are the most effective forms of technology and web tools to encourage public participation, engage with the private sector/non-profit and academic communities, and provide the public with greater and more meaningful opportunities to influence agencies’ plans?
·         What are possible mechanisms for agencies to increase the level of diversity of viewpoints and backgrounds brought to bear in their activities and decisions?
·         What are the most effective strategies for ensuring that participation is well-informed?
·         What are some examples of success stories involving strong public participation, as well as less-than-successful efforts, and what lessons can be drawn from them?
Please send your thoughts to us at opengov@ostp.gov or use the web form provided, by January 3, 2012.  We will consider your ideas and input as we continue to implement the U.S. National Action Plan and develop this best practices guidance on public participation.
Special thanks to Richard Charter

The Guardian: Australia announces plans for world’s largest marine park

theguardian 28.11.11
Updated 22.55
Coral Sea park is the size of France and Germany combined and will help protect fish, coral reefs and nesting sites
The Australian marine park will protect green turtle nesting sites

The Australian marine park will protect green turtle nesting sites. Photograph: Getty Images
Reuters

The Guardian, Fri 25 Nov 2011 15.32 GMT

Australia has announced plans for the world’s biggest marine park, intended to protect vast areas of the Coral Sea off the north-east coast and the site of naval battles during the second world war.  The environment minister, Tony Burke, said the park would cover an area almost the size of France and Germany combined and would help to protect fish, coral reefs and nesting sites for seabirds and the green turtle.
“The environmental significance of the Coral Sea lies in its diverse array of coral reefs, sandy cays, deep sea plains and canyons,” Burke said. “It contains more than 20 outstanding examples of isolated tropical reefs, sandy cays and islands.”
The park would also cover ships sunk in the Battle of the Coral Sea, a series of naval engagements between Japanese, US and Australian forces in 1942, considered the world’s first aircraft carrier battles. Three US ships were known to have sunk in the north-eastern area of the Coral Sea – the USS Lexington, the USS Sims and the USS Neosho, Burke said.
The government will finalise the limits that will be imposed on the Coral Sea marine park, which will be within Australia’s economic zone, in 90 days.  The world’s current largest reserve was established by Britain last year around the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean, which includes coral atoll The Great Chagos Bank.

Center for Biologic Diversity: Gas-mileage Rules Small Step Forward; Fall Short of What’s Needed

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 16, 2011
3:41 PM

CONTACT: Center for Biological Diversity

Vera Pardee, (858) 717-1448

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2011/11/16-11

 

I post this story here in Reef News because the effects of ocean acidification are destroying coral reefs.  It is one of the effects of global climate change that can be diminished through greater reductions in fuel emissions.  DeeVon

WASHINGTON – November 16 – The Obama administration proposed new vehicle fuel-emission standards today that fall far short of what is needed to make significant reductions in greenhouse gas pollution — and also short of what is achievable. The standards announced today, for tailpipe emissions and gas mileage for passenger vehicles and light trucks in 2025, are below the European Union’s proposed standards for 2020. Gas mileage would reach a maximum of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025; the Center for Biological Diversity advocated for standards exceeding 60 miles per gallon.

“While we applaud progress, these weak standards simply don’t reflect the urgency of the climate crisis,” said Vera Pardee, an attorney at the Center’s Climate Law Institute. “The United States has long had some of the weakest fuel-economy standards in the industrialized world, and today’s announcement does little to change that.”

Earlier this month, a sobering report from the highly respected International Energy Agency warned that the door is closing on our ability to avert the worst impacts of climate change. The IEA concluded that “[t]here are few signs that the urgently needed change in direction in global energy trends is underway.” Today’s announcement does little to improve the status quo.

Current laws require the government to set fuel-efficiency standards at the “maximum feasible” level and are designed to spur technological innovation by requiring that standards be set beyond what is achievable today. Despite these requirements, the administration’s rulemaking, driven by negotiations with the industry being regulated, would lock the nation into an inadequate pace of progress for the next 14 years.

The transportation sector accounts for about a third of total U.S. greenhouse emissions — and passenger vehicles account for about two-thirds of transportation emissions, spewing nearly 1.2 billion metric tons of “carbon dioxide equivalent” emissions each year. Technologies are available today to make significant reductions, including more efficient and less-polluting engines and transmissions, strong but lightweight materials, improved aerodynamics, and hybrid and electric vehicles.

“Setting fuel-economy standards for 14 years from now that are lower than what we can achieve with technology on the road today is not the kind of progress we urgently need,” said Pardee.

###

At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature – to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law, and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters, and climate that species need to survive.

NOAA: U.S. residents say Hawaii’s coral reef ecosystems worth $33.57 billion per year

http://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/news/featuredstories/oct11/hi_value/

A peer-reviewed study, commissioned by NOAA, reveals the estimated total economic value the American people hold for the coral reefs of the main Hawaiian Islands is $33.57 billion.

Coral Reefs off Maui

This is a small moray eel in the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of Maui. Photo credit: NOAA

Report Executive Summary
Report Chapters
Study Background
Summary of Values
Socioeconomic Factors

“Hawaiians, as well as residents from across the United States, treasure Hawaii’s coral reefs, even those citizens who never get to visit,” said Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D., under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. “This study illustrates the economic value of coral reefs to all Americans, and how important it is to conserve these ecosystems for future generations,”

“We are pleased that research is being done to look at the value of Hawaii’s coral reefs, but before we consider any potential applications of the study we will consult closely with local communities,” said William J. Aila, Jr., chairperson of the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources.

The study employed a scientifically developed national Internet survey of more than 3,200 households – a representative sample of all U.S. residents, not just Hawaiians or coastal dwellers. From June through October 2009, the survey allowed the public to express its preferences and values for protection and restoration of the coral reef ecosystems around the main Hawaiian Islands. In this study, total economic value includes passive use values, such as the willingness to pay to protect the coral reef ecosystem for future generations, and direct use values– snorkeling over a coral reef or consuming fish supported by coral reef ecosystems.

To estimate the public’s underlying values of coral reef ecosystems, the study team presented survey participants with two specific measures to protect and restore coral reef ecosystems. One measure aimed at reducing effects to coral ecosystems from fishing, and another to repair reefs damaged by ships.

A panel of independent university and private scientists, from both Hawaii and the continental US, provided facts to the survey design team about the Hawaiian coral reef ecosystems and provided estimates of how the coral reef ecosystems would change in response to the two possible management options. The descriptions, including illustrations, of improvement to coral ecosystems gave survey respondents a clear understanding of what they were being asked to value and how the ecosystems would change as a result of the protection measures.

The main Hawaiian Islands consist of eight volcanic islands that range in age from active lava flows on the east side of the Big Island to seven million-year-old Kauai. Despite their economic significance, reefs near urbanized areas, such as Honolulu, Wailuku, and Kahului, have experienced increasing stress from ever-increasing population pressures.

The national survey was funded by NOAA and the National Science Foundation, and was designed to address the issue of Internet bias. The survey was conducted through two Internet panels; one recruited participants using controlled random digit dialing telephone surveys and the other using standard U.S. Bureau of the Census methods of randomly selecting households and going to each household to recruit participants via face-to-face interviewing.

News media inquiries: Ben Sherman, (301) 713-3066, Ben.Sherman@noaa.gov