Florida AP News: Sponsors Drops Fla. Offshoe Drilling Plan for Now

http://cbs4.com/wireapnewsfl/House.sponsor.drops.2.1636485.html
CBS Channel 4  Florida AP News

Sponsor Drops Fla. Offshore Drilling Plan For Now
BILL KACZOR, Associated Press Writer
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – The House sponsor of legislation that would lift a ban on offshore drilling in Florida’s state waters said Friday he was dropping the effort for this year but would try again in 2011.

Rep. Dean Cannon made the announcement as a committee he chairs began reviewing a draft that had yet to be filed with just two weeks left in the 60-day legislative session.

It would have allowed drilling rigs as close as three miles from shore on a temporary basis. Permanent rigs or platforms would have had to stay at least six miles away.

“It is not the right time to vote on this issue,” said the Winter Park Republican. “This is a bicameral process and I haven’t seen any evidence that would suggest that our counterparts in the Senate have an appetite for this issue this year.”

Instead, he plans to use the draft as a starting point next year when he’ll preside over the House as speaker if Republicans retain their majority as expected.

He’ll also have a powerful partner. Sen. Mike Haridopolos, an Indialantic Republican who has been leading the push for offshore oil and natural gas drilling in the other chamber, has been designated as Senate president for 2011-12.

Haridopolos would replace Senate President Jeff Atwater, a North Palm Beach Republican who is leaving the Legislature to run for chief financial officer.

Cannon’s draft bill would allow drilling in state waters that extend about 10 miles into the Gulf of Mexico and some three miles into the Atlantic Ocean.

It would not affect federal waters farther from shore. President Barack Obama recently announced plans to lift drilling barriers there. He wants to open up the Atlantic from Delaware to central Florida and plans to ask Congress to repeal a ban on drilling in the gulf within 125 miles of Florida’s beaches.

Cannon sponsored a similar bill that passed in the House late in last year’s session. Atwater was cool to the idea and it was not taken up in the Senate.

The Select Policy Council on Strategic & Economic Planning agreed to send a report on the issue to Speaker Larry Cretul, R-Ocala, that he can forward to his successor – Cannon.

The panel first took public testimony, again hearing the usual arguments.

Proponents said drilling can be done safely to help reduce dependence on foreign oil while providing the state with a new source of revenue.

Opponents said it still wasn’t worth the risk to Florida’s environment and tourism industry nor would it provide the state with a significant boost to either its economy or treasury.

Jay Liles, representing the Florida Wildlife Federation and Apalachicola Riverkeeper, said Florida instead should do more to promote renewable energy.

“This bill will rely on false promises of energy independence based on hope-for bonanzas,” Liles said. “If we can create more jobs, if we can grow a stronger economy by supporting renewable energy in a stronger fashion could we not forgo or at least stall the decision to go into our natural resources by drilling near shore?”

Florida Petroleum Council executive director Dave Mica spoke in favor of the bill. Mica acknowledged drilling in state waters was not the answer to energy independence or full employment but he argued it was part of the equation.

He credited the Legislature’s examination of the issue with persuading many Floridians to drop their long-standing opposition to drilling.

“We’ve won an awful lot of brains by this discussion,” Mica said. “We’ve still got some hearts to go.”

special thanks to Richard Charter

Williamsport Sun Gazette: Gas industry’s potential impact on the environment discussed at public hearings here

http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/542033.html?nav=5011
Williamsport Sun Gazette
Williamsport, PA
Gas industry’s potential impact on the environment discussed at public hearing here
By DAVID THOMPSON dthompson@sungazette.com
POSTED: April 14, 2010
State Rep. Rick Mirabito, D-Williamsport, top photo, looks on as state Rep. Marc Gergely, D-White Oak, asks a question during the state House Democratic Policy Committee hearing on environmental issues of the Marcellus Shale and the Chesapeake Bay on Tuesday at Lycoming College.

MARK NANCE/Sun-Gazette
While few people are questioning the enormous economic impact of developing the natural gas resources in the Marcellus Shale, the gas industry’s potential impact on the environment is generating a lively debate.
That debate came to Lycoming College Tuesday during a public hearing by the state House Democratic Policy Committee.

The event, which mostly focused on environmental issues related to gas exploration, and to a lesser extent, the Chesapeake Bay, was co-chaired by state Reps. Rick Mirabito, D-Williamsport, and Mike Sturla, D-Lancaster.
Also sitting on the panel was state Rep. Mike Hanna, D-Lock Haven. Hanna said he supports a moratorium on leasing state land until the full impact of the gas industry is known.

A diverse group of speakers provided testimony regarding the Marcellus Shale during the near four-hour session.

Scott Perry, director of the state Department of Environmental Protection’s Bureau of Oil and Gas Management, discussed the agency’s role in regulating the industry and efforts it is taking to ensure gas development is done with minimal impact on the environment.

Perry said that while other departments within the agency have reduced staff because of the state’s budget problems, the oil and gas bureau has added personnel.

In spite of that, the agency – and the industry – face challenges on what to do with water-borne pollutants, such as Total Dissolved Solids or “TDS,” generated by the industry.

Perry said TDS in gas industry wastewater has concentrations of salt many times that of sea water.

Technologies exist to removed dissolved solids from gas wastewater, he said. However, the capacity to treat expected wastewater volumes does not yet exist in the state, he said.

Perry said he favors imposing a severance tax on gas removed from the shale to provide funding to cover the cost of mitigating the impact of gas exploration on local communities and the environment.

Terry Bossert, vice president of government affairs for Texas-based Chief Oil and Gas, discussed his company’s efforts to reduce the environmental impacts of shale development.

Those efforts include developing an inspection program for every well the company drills, Bossert said. The company also is using more stringent standards for its well casing – alternating layers of steel pipe and cement designed to prevent the migration of gas into ground water aquifers – proposed, but not yet adopted, by the DEP.

“We always case our wells the way we’re going to under the new regulations,” he said.

The industry’s use of a single well pad to drill multiple wells reduces land disturbance, he said.

“It would be foolish to say we could develop the Marcellus Shale and not have any impact on the environment,” Bossert said, adding that all human activity comes with some degree of environmental impact.

Bossert said the gas industry is well-regulated in Pennsylvania. His company deals with many agencies, including the DEP, Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Game Commission, Fish and Boat Commission and Army Corps of Engineers.

“We’ve even dealt with the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,” Bossert said.

The latter agency came into the picture when Chief was building a pipeline and came across an old abandoned still, he said.

The one thing the industry needs from regulatory agencies is “consistency from region to region and project to project.”

Bossert said he does not oppose a severance tax, but believes it is the wrong time to do it while the industry is investing millions of dollars in the early stages of Marcellus Shale development.

Jon Bogle, co-founder of local industry watchdog group Responsible Drilling Alliance, said air pollution may be the industry’s biggest health risk.

Bogle discussed a study by Dr. Al Armendariz, an environmental engineering professor at Southern Methodist University who now is an administrator with the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

The study, which was contested by the gas industry, showed that gas industry operations caused more smog pollution than all motorized vehicles and airport operations in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, Bogle said.

Bogle also cited air and noise pollution issues that arose in Dish, Texas, a town in the Barnett Shale region.

His testimony included a recent story published in the Dallas Morning News showing most Barnett Shale facilities such as wells, condensate tanks and compressor stations emitted toxic chemicals into the air.

Bogle said that while air pollution may be the biggest health risk, it also may be the easiest pollution to control because of readily available equipment.
Also speaking were Eric Conrad, of the North Central Workforce Investment Board, and Thomas Beaudy, deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

Beaudy discussed the industry’s need for water for gas drilling operations. The commission must approve water use for any Marcellus Shale drilling operation in the river basin.

According to Beaudy, the industry currently is using less than 1 million gallons of water per day. At full production, about 28 million gallons of water will be used per day, he said.

Also discussed during the hearing was the possible development of an industry-generated fund that could be used to deal with long-term environmental impacts discovered after the industry has left the area.

According to Mirabito, the hearing was part of an effort to “explore issues so we can get the facts on the table and make informed decisions.”
“We all need air, water and soil to survive,” Mirabito said. “We also need energy. We all drove here and we all took showers with water (heated) by hot water heaters.”

Sunshine State News: Florida Democrats Divided on Obama Drilling Plan

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/florida-democrats-divided-obama-drilling-plan-0
Sunshine State News
Florida Democrats Divided on Obama Drilling Plan
BY: KEVIN DERBY | POSTED: APRIL 13, 2010 12:15 AM
It’s rare to see a former Florida Democratic Party chairman taking President Barack Obama to task — but that’s exactly what Scott Maddox is doing on the issue of offshore oil drilling.
With Obama having come out for expanded offshore energy exploration, including up to 125 miles off the shore of the Sunshine State, Florida Democrats are somewhat divided in their backing of the president. While some leading Democrats, including state Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink and U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, are backing the president, Maddox and Democrats in the U.S. House continue to fight the proposal.

Maddox, now the frontrunner in a crowded Democratic primary for commissioner of agriculture and consumer services, had made opposition to offshore drilling one of the centerpieces of his campaign, even answering calls to “drill, baby, drill” with “no, baby, no.”

Maddox sent a letter to the White House on Monday, pleading with the president to pull the plug on any plans for drilling off the coast of Florida.

“When it comes to offshore oil drilling however, on behalf of the millions of Floridians who depend on clean beaches, clean water and a struggling tourism economy; please, not in our backyard,” wrote Maddox.

He played up the financial threat that offshore drilling could represent to Florida tourism.
“These beaches are not just environmental treasures; they are one of the most important drivers of our economy as well,” wrote Maddox. “In fact, we depend on their environmental vitality to ensure our financial security.”

Maddox is not alone among Florida’s Democrats in pushing back against the president’s call for expanded drilling. U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown, U.S. Rep. Alcee Hastings and U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz sent a letter to the president on March 31, blasting his proposal for offshore drilling 125 miles from Florida’s shores.

Like Maddox, the representatives focused on the environmental impact as well as the potential damage offshore drilling could have on tourism.

“In an already depressed economy, and with unemployment in the state of Florida nearing 13 percent, the last thing we need to do is endanger nearly one million jobs and the $65 billion tourism industry in our state,” said Brown. “Indeed, drilling for oil anywhere near Florida’s coasts, even if the drilling takes place more than 125 miles offshore, could prove devastating to Florida’s tourist industry.”

U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor sent a letter to the president April 5 in which she expressed her concerns with drilling off Florida’s shores.

“There are some places in our country that are too special to drill,” said Castor. “Florida’s coastline certainly fits that description.”

Still, the president’s plan has backers among Florida Democrats.

State CFO Alex Sink, the likely Democratic gubernatorial nominee, endorsed the president’s plan March 31.

“I support additional offshore exploration 125 miles from Florida’s coasts,” Sink said, though she added that she opposed drilling closer to the shore.

U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson offered conditional support for the president’s plans, but he is waiting to meet with officials from the defense department before fully endorsing them. Nelson is attempting to schedule meeting with Pentagon brass to see if drilling would get in the way of military operations off Florida’s coast.

The primary field for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated reflected the divisions among Florida Democrats.

U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek, the frontrunner in the Democratic primary, had some concerns about the president’s proposal and said that the issue needed to be looked at in depth.

“Today’s announcement on energy security and independence requires serious consideration and study as questions remain unanswered, but caution must trump expediency,” Meek said after the president released his plan.

Former North Miami Mayor Kevin Burns, one of Meek’s opponents in the Democratic primary, blasted Obama’s plans.

“From day one of my campaign I have said, ‘Not one mile, not five miles, not 50 miles, not 100 miles off our shores’,” said Burns. “Our economy, our way of life and our children’s future are too important to play political games with – we need real solutions for energy independence, not more short term profiteering for the richest corporations.”

 Contact Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com, or at (904) 521-3722.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Digital Journal: Louisiana Oil Spill Highlights Need to Protect Gulf from Drilling & more…

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/290333
Louisiana oil spill highlights need to protect Gulf from drilling
After being noticed early on Tuesday morning, the US Coast Guard, State of Louisiana and the Cypress Pipeline Company have been working for days to contain a pipeline leak that has seen 18,000 gallons of oil released.

 Stephanie Dearing

New Orleans, LA – Cypress Pipeline shut down the section of pipe, preventing even more oil from being pumped into the sensitive coastal area of Louisiana, home to the Delta National Wildlife Refuge. Wednesday saw over 16 vessels deployed to the scene, with up to 50 people working to set up a boom to contain the spill. It is estimated the spill covers 160 square miles.

The released oil came from a Chevron operation, although Cypress owns the pipe. Officials are downplaying the potential impact, saying the effects of the leak appears to be minimal. The cause of the leak is not known, and an investigation is ongoing.

The wildlife refuge is situated at the mouth of the Mississippi, and is home to migratory water fowl. There are 455 oil and gas wells in the refuge, all there with permission of the government. The refuge is also habitat for several endangered species, including the American Alligator and the Arctic Peregrine Falcon.

According to researchers, “The Mississippi Delta encompasses the largest area of coastal wetlands in the United States and supports one of the most extensive developments of petroleum extraction of any coastal area in the world. This area has experienced ecological impacts from energy development related human activities since the early 1900s.”

40% of America’s refining capacity is situated in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Mexico, wrote Ko and Day in their study, with Louisiana America’s number two source of crude oil source.

The incident has sparked a renewal of calls against further oil drilling in the Gulf, with environmental groups saying there is not enough oversight. Activists point to previous spills in the Gulf of Mexico; such as the January incident that saw over 450,000 gallons of oil released into the Gulf after an oil-laden ship collided with a tug boat. Last summer, an underwater pipeline leak saw over 58,000 gallons of oil spilled into the Gulf.

There are thousands of miles of pipeline in the United States that carry oil and natural gas. Pipelines are the number one mode for transporting oil in the United States.

There are a number of international interests drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico. China has been trying to get a toehold on accessing some of the riches hidden under the Gulf of Mexico waters, reportedly negotiating to take over oil leases from a Norwegian company.

Chevron is attempting to access oil reserves deep under the Gulf of Mexico, and the operation is not cheap. The company is currently spending $1 million per day to try to access the oil — which might not even exist. Companies are willing to spend extravagant sums of money in a bid to tap into the oil thought to be hidden beneath the Gulf.

Current extraction sees about 1.5 million barrels of oil a day coming out of the Gulf of Mexico. Tapping into new reserves could push that up to 1.88 million barrels a day.

Environmentalists are concerned with the quality of the water in the ocean, as well as protecting vulnerable plant and animal species. Organizations representing businesses found around the Gulf of Mexico are concerned that the push to drill for oil deep in the Gulf will negatively affect tourism.

There are thousands of oil drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, although not all are in operation.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/290352

Digital Journal

La. resident fears dangers from gas exploration, drilling Special

Carol Forsloff
Trucks move down a side street in Saline, Louisiana with others as part of a parade in small town America.

Dolores Blalock has 50 acres of land in Sabine, Louisiana, estimated worth a lot of money for oil and natural gas, but Blalock is standing up and saying no to pollution of family land, a remarkable stance for anyone who could perhaps make millions.
As the oil spill from pipeline leakage enters the Gulf, the conversations about hydraulic fracturing and natural gas exploration have revved up around Natchitoches Parish. Most people say they favor it as they also advocate exploring offshore sites. But some don’t, like Blalock; and they are rare.

The oil and gas men have been surrounding Natchitoches Parish and the areas of North and Central Louisiana, with their big promises of big money.

Some of the humble folk have marched into banks flush with cash in bulging pockets. These are the new rich. So what’s the issue? Why wouldn’t someone like Blalock succumb?

The issue is hydraulic fracturing and worries about pollution that already plague Louisiana, especially when many believe the southern part of the State sold out to oil and gas interests long ago. The process of hydraulic fracturing is different than the oil drilling that goes on in coastal areas, but the concerns about the environment are still strong, among the few few protest locally. The issue is water pollution and potentially cancer-causing contaminants.

But Blalock won’t and says this, “This is my parents’ land. It has belonged to my family and is pristine. I intend to keep it. I don’t care if other people sell out. Until I know the drilling is really safe, I am not going to budge. I see other people offered money, but I’m not sure I want to go in that direction.”

Blalock has lived in Louisiana off and on for about two years since the death of her mother who left her a house and 50 acres of land. It is property that her parents purchased many years ago, and other family members own tracts of land nearby. But she has spent many years in California as well, returning to Louisiana where she spent her childhood and young adulthood to take care of family business and perhaps to permanently settle. She has the environmental concerns she brings from the Western states and looks at the issues in Louisiana with different eyes than people around the area.

“I worry about the long-term effects of this business,” Blalock declares, “And I don’t want to be one of those people who helps cause the problems for the state, even though I know other people just look at the money thing. I have to live with myself, frankly; and I just can’t see doing something that would put people at risk. If they show me real evidence, and I find it myself too, then maybe I will be interested in their money. But not until, and maybe never.”

In some parts of the country there have already been lawsuits on the practice of oil and gas drilling. This is in addition to objections made by environmentalists about drilling along the Gulf Coast.

Scott Lumry, a Natchitoches resident, says about Natchitoches that in spite of the economic downturn the area will likely survive. He says, “People around here are getting money from oil and gas and more is coming in all the time. I see folks are likely going to make it in spite of University cutbacks, because this new business is getting people excited.”

Exciting some, but worrying others, the oil and gas business of drilling, and the concerns about pollution continue, even as the oil spill reported today by Stephanie Dearing continues to enter the Gulf.

But central and northern residents, for the most part, remain interested in money to be made from natural gas, as evidenced by the talk in the town, what Lumry has said and bank tellers at the local Bank of Montgomery who notice more folks coming in with money. Few are like Blalock and ask the hard questions.

New York is now the epicenter of protest against hydraulic fracturing even as North and Central Louisiana continue to give thumbs up to the process, so the economy can proceed to go forward without interruption.

Environment America: Louisiana Oil Spill Highlights Continued Safety Concerns

http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/Louisiana_Oil_Spill_Highlights_Continued_Safety_Concerns_7999.html
Beyond Chron, San Francisco
(photos of spill online)
from Environment America

Louisiana Oil Spill Highlights Continued Safety Concerns
by Ryan Scholl, Environment America’ Apr. 09’ 2010
 
Early Tuesday morning, 18000 gallons of oil spilled from a Chevron-operated pipeline into a sensitive wildlife refuge on the coast of Louisiana. The oil has so far spread to an area of about 160 square miles, covering wetlands of the Delta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Gulf of Mexico. The refuge is the wintering home to hundreds of thousands of migratory birds as well as many other critters, including already threatened species such as the America alligator and the brown pelican.

The area of the spill is so remote that cleanup crews were not immediately able to get to it. Currently, local and state officials and crews from the oil company are on the scene driving the cleanup efforts. Updates on wildlife harmed by the oil are not yet in. Given the size and location of the spill, injured wildlife may not have been found or reported yet.

This spill is just one of many in recent memory. In January, an oil tanker headed for an Exxon Mobil refinery in Beaumont, TX spilled 462,000 gallons into the Gulf of Mexico after it collided with a tugboat. Last year off the Australian coast, millions of gallons gushed out of a deep water drilling rig after an explosion in an underwater pipe. That rig was state of the art, just two years old. The oil, which continued leaking for weeks, was said to have spread across more than 9000 square miles. And there are hundreds of other examples of recent spills.

Comparatively, this week’s spill off the Louisiana coast seems almost small. But with all that’s at stake, even a little bit of oil can do tremendous harm. That’s one reason why Environment America opposes President Obama’s recent announcement of plans to expand oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, off the Southeastern Atlantic, and in Northern Alaska. Despite claims by drilling supporters about the safety of modern drilling equipment and oil transportation techniques, there are no perfectly safe methods. Spills will continue to happen as long as we drill for oil.

And spills, of course, will continue to have disastrous impacts on wildlife, the tourism industry and our beaches. Though it’s difficult to estimate the true cost of an oil spill, a 2009 report by Environment America showed the economic value of sustainable ocean activities nationwide to be about $197 billion, compared to $164 billion for the value of nonrenewable oil and gas extraction. Even if your primary concern is the bottom line, the financial benefits alone of a clean offshore environment are worth supporting over the expansion of drilling.

We also oppose new drilling off our coasts because we just don’t need to do it. At best, new offshore drilling would meet only a tiny fraction of our current oil usage. In addition and more importantly, we have real options to reduce our dependence significantly, through using cleaner cars and increasing funding for public transportation. Recently announced increases in the national fuel economy standards will reduce gasoline consumption by as much as 11.6 billion gallons per year in 2016.

With irrefutable evidence of the dangers of oil drilling on the environment, plus the impact these threats have on coastal communities and the abundance and accessibility of cleaner and safer alternatives, it’s clear we should be moving away from using more oil and toward a cleaner, safer and more efficient future. Spills like the one this week in the Louisiana wildlife refuge are just the most recent reminder that we must do more to save our shores.

Special thanks to  Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi