E&E: Offshore Drilling: Left ramps up pressure on Obama to shelve long-term drilling plans

Alex Kaplun, E&E reporter

Left-wing interest groups are launching campaigns to lean on President Obama to reinstate the ban on offshore drilling, and there are signs that the idea is getting increased traction on Capitol Hill.   MoveOn.org, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth are among the groups using the ever-expanding Gulf of Mexico spill to fight the recent push for increased offshore drilling.

Today, MoveOn.org urged its members to call the White House and ask Obama to reinstate the offshore drilling moratorium that was allowed to expire in 2008.   “The spill is already a major environmental and commercial disaster for the Gulf Coast,” MoveOn organizers wrote in an e-mail blast to its membership today. “It’s also a wake up call. The Senate is considering legislation that will promote new offshore oil exploration. President Obama can stop this by reinstating the ban on new offshore drilling. Hearing from Americans coast to coast will send a powerful message that we don’t want new drilling.”
Greenpeace is also using the opportunity to call on Obama to not only reinstate the offshore moratorium but also block Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s plans to start drilling in parts of the Arctic this summer. And the Alaska Wilderness League similarly called on the administration to shelve the Arctic drilling, stating that the administration would have a significantly harder time responding to a spill in Alaska than the Gulf of Mexico.
“The risk is too high in the Arctic, especially since the lessons from the Gulf have yet to be learned,” said Alaska Wilderness League Executive Director Cindy Shogan. “Obama must act now on his timeout on all offshore drilling before we sacrifice another one of our precious coasts.”
Friends of the Earth this week also launched its own petition effort, calling on Obama “to focus on investing in clean energy instead of reverting to more drilling,” and has also called on offshore drilling language to be stripped from the climate and energy bill. The group says that thus far, the petition has garnered 18,000 signatures.

The Obama administration today already ordered a freeze on any new offshore drilling until an investigation is complete into the ongoing Deepwater Horizon spill. That, however, has not been good enough for MoveOn and others on the left who want nothing less than the reinstatement of the offshore moratorium that had been on the books for 30 years.
“This spill isn’t just about one accident,” MoveOn wrote. “It’s also a powerful reminder that this country needs an energy policy that breaks our addiction to oil, that invests in clean energy solutions like wind and solar, and that keeps our communities safe.”    The groups behind the campaigns largely represent the left flank of the Democratic Party, and many major Washington-based environmental groups have yet to make similar statements. But there are also signs on Capitol Hill that some Democratic lawmakers are moving toward embracing a reinstatement of the moratorium.    Four members of New Jersey’s delegation today called for the administration to at the very least reverse the decision to increase drilling along the East Coast. “This catastrophe demonstrates exactly why no new drilling should proceed in any U.S. waters, and certainly not in the Atlantic,” the members wrote.    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) also hinted in his own statement today that the spill will force Congress to take another look at offshore drilling policy.    “This terrible event will, undoubtedly, require us to re-examine how we extract our nation’s offshore energy resources and will have to be taken into consideration with any legislation that proposes to open new areas to development,” Reid said.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

AP: Obama: Offshore oil leases will have safeguards

http://www.adn.com/2010/04/30/1257776/obama-offshore-oil-leases-will.html
 
By H. JOSEF HEBERT and JULIE PACE
The Associated Press

(04/30/10 11:59:06)
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday directed that no new offshore oil drilling leases be issued unless rigs have new safeguards to prevent a repeat of the explosion and resulting massive spill threatening the Gulf Coast with major environmental damage.
Obama ordered Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to report within 30 days on what new technologies are needed to tighten safeguards against oil spills from deep water drilling rigs.
“We are going to make sure that any leases going forward have those safeguards,” said Obama at a White House Rose Garden event.
The president sought to reassure the jittery Gulf Coast that Washington is on top of the mounting oil spill crisis, saying people’s livelihoods and a region’s ecology are at stake.
His declaration on future lease sales is not expected to have any immediate impact.
White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said no oil production is being halted and there are no new drilling lease sales in the pipeline for the 30-day period Salazar has to get the report back to Obama. Oil rigs and platforms currently operating in the Gulf are being inspected by the Interior Department.
Interior has two lease sales scheduled for Gulf waters later this year and four more in the Gulf and off Alaska in 2011. The first offshore leases under an expanded drilling plan announced by Obama a month ago would be issued for waters off the Virginia coast in 2012 at the earliest.
Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Friday that he wouldn’t rule out changes to Obama’s offshore drilling plan, pending the results of Salazar’s report.
It’s still unclear what caused the explosion on the BP rig more than 40 miles off the Louisiana coast.
But foreshadowing the possible legal fallout from the increasingly menacing oil spill, the Justice Department said Friday it was sending a team of attorneys to New Orleans to meet with the U.S. attorney and response teams and to monitor the spill.
“The British Petroleum oil spill has already cost lives and created a major environmental incident,” Attorney General Holder said in a statement. “The Justice Department stands ready to make available every resource at our disposal to vigorously enforce the laws that protect the people who work and reside near the Gulf, the wildlife, the environment and the American taxpayers.”
Several civil suits already have been filed by private lawyers in the Gulf region.
Government officials said the blown-out well 40 miles offshore is spewing five times as much oil into the water as originally estimated — about 5,000 barrels, or 200,000 gallons, a day. The oil slick could become the nation’s worst environmental disaster in decades, threatening hundreds of species of fish, birds and other wildlife along the Gulf Coast, one of the world’s richest seafood grounds.
In his remarks Friday, Obama cited a series of federal interventions in recent days, all designed to blunt the oil spill’s impact and put people at ease.
“Let me be clear: I continue to believe that domestic oil production is an important part of our overall strategy for energy security,” Obama said. “But I’ve always said that it must be done responsibly for the safety of our workers and our environment.”
Obama said that oil company BP ultimately is responsible for the crisis, but that the federal government is fully prepared to meet its responsibilities to communities.
Gibbs wouldn’t say whether the White House has confidence in BP’s handling of the incident, only telling reporters Friday that the government “has had oversight over this the entire time.”
Earlier, a top adviser to Obama said no new oil drilling will be authorized until authorities learn what caused the explosion.
David Axelrod also defended the administration’s response to the April 20 accident, saying “we had the Coast Guard in almost immediately.”
He deflected comparisons with the government’s slow response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005, telling ABC’s “Good Morning America” that such speculation “is always the case in Washington whenever something like this happens.”
Obama recently lifted a drilling moratorium for many offshore areas, including the Atlantic and Gulf areas. But Axelrod said Friday “no additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what has happened here.”

News: Obey Statement on BP Oil Spill in Gulf of Mexico

Sent: Fri Apr 30 17:21:43 2010
Subject: NEWS: Obey Statement on BP Oil Spill in Gulf of Mexico

Special thanks to Richard Charter

WWW.OBEY.HOUSE.GOV
 
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Sara Merriam
April 30, 2010
(202) 225-3365
 
 
 
OBEY STATEMENT ON B.P. OIL SPILL
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Seventh District Congressman Dave Obey (D-WI) released the following statement today on the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico:
 
“The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates how dangerous it is to assume that because we have not had environmental disasters for a number of years, that we can afford to get careless in terms of protecting the most precious aspects of the environment.
 
The White House recently indicated their willingness to modify long-standing limitations on offshore oil drilling.  Supporters of that action suggested that because the technology has changed, it has become safe to run risks associated with expanded offshore oil drilling.  But in fact, while there have been no major, well-publicized disasters, there have been dozens of smaller episodes of accidents that produced oil spills.
 
We need to learn – all over again it seems – that in assessing potential damage to precious environmental areas that we cannot behave as though we are permanent presidents of Optimist Clubs.  We need to be constantly aware of the worst case possibilities.
 
The same is true for nuclear power.  While it is certainly much less damaging to the earth’s climate balance than carbon based energy sources, it still holds the potential for catastrophes.  We’ve not had a nuclear accident in many years, but the potential for one is just as real as was the potential for an offshore disaster.  All it will take is one nuclear accident similar to that of Three Mile Island to remind us once again of the dangers of assuming that because we’ve been lucky in the past, we’ll be lucky in the future.
 
That doesn’t mean we should display unthinking resistance to offshore oil production or nuclear power production, because life involves trade-offs and a mature assessment of potential risks.  But it does mean that we have a practical and moral obligation to greatly enhance our aggressiveness in pursuing alternative sources of energy production and our activities on the energy efficiency and conservation fronts.  This spill shows that that is not just a feel good or wishful thinking approach to energy policy, it is a hard-nosed and hard-headed requirement if we do not want to foul our own nest as we have so many times in the past.
 
This also points out the need for corporate responsibility.  It took 20 years for Exxon to finish its appeals on the 1989 Valdez disaster and, in the end, they only paid a fraction of the true costs of that disaster.  So far it appears that BP is pursuing a more responsible course, but we must keep on the case to make sure that parties responsible take the lead in cleaning it up.”
 
 
# # #
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_________________________________
Ellis Brachman
Spokesman, House Appropriations Committee
Cong. Dave Obey (D-WI), Chairman
p) 202 226-5828  c) 202 713-0708
ellis.brachman@mail.house.gov
http://appropriations.house.gov

TampaBay.com: Crist says oil spill proves drilling isn’t safe, withdraws his support & more….

http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/water/crist-says-oil-spill-proves-drilling-isnt-safe-withdraws-his-support/1090626
TampaBay.com
St. Petersburg Times
Crist says oil spill proves drilling isn’t safe, withdraws his support

By Marc Caputo, Mary Ellen Klas and Craig Pittman, Times/Herald Tallahassee Bureau
In Print: Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The oil spill spreading across the Gulf of Mexico is sending ripples through Florida and national politics, giving Gov. Charlie Crist a reason to withdraw his support for offshore drilling.

After a 90-minute plane flight Tuesday above the spill, which was spreading in an 80-mile by 42-mile blob, Crist said, “Clearly it could be devastating to Florida if something like that were to occur. It’s the last thing in the world I would want to see happen in our beautiful state.”

He said there is no question now that lawmakers should give up on the idea of drilling off Florida’s coast this year and in coming years. He has said previously he would support drilling if it was far enough from shore, safe enough and clean enough. He said the spill is proof that’s not possible.

“Clearly that one isn’t far enough and that’s about 50 to 60 miles out, it’s clearly not clean enough after we saw what we saw today – that’s horrific – and it certainly isn’t safe enough. It’s the opposite of safe,” Crist said.
Earlier in the day the Legislature’s main advocate of drilling, incoming House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Orlando, said the disaster had him asking questions.

“It causes me to want to examine what happened and how it could have been prevented, and we need to figure that out before we make any further decisions,” said Cannon, who has proposed allowing rigs as close as 3 miles off Florida’s beaches.

Before the spill, Cannon had promised to bring the drilling proposal back up when he becomes speaker next year, touting the millions of dollars in revenue and thousands of jobs that would be created by near-shore drilling.

But Attorney General Bill McCollum, a fellow Republican running for governor, said Cannon should forget passing that bill in 2011 because “he’ll face a veto on my desk if he brings it up the way it is now. I know it’s a revenue producer, but that’s not a good enough reason.”

Meanwhile, in Washington, the spill “is going to have a chilling effect” on a plan by President Barack Obama to open up the eastern gulf to drilling, predicted U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla.: “It’s another reminder of the risks of offshore drilling.”

And the senator welcomed Crist back, after the governor in 2008 said he had become more open to the possibility of drilling off Florida. Nelson said he was “very glad the governor realized the realities of what an oil spill could do to the beaches of the Florida coast.”

The oil, which has been oozing out at a rate estimated at 42,000 gallons a day, is coming from the site of the Deepwater Horizon rig.

Deepwater Horizon exploded about 11 p.m. on April 20 and later sank. Eleven members of the 126-member crew remain missing and are presumed dead. The cause of the explosion at the rig remains under investigation.

Efforts to close off the leak using robot submarines have so far failed. Other options for ending the leak could take longer – up to three months, according to U.S. Coast Guard officials.

The marshes of southern Louisiana and Mississippi appear to face the most immediate risk from the spill because they are closest to it, oceanographers say. However, if the leaking oil drifts far enough east to get caught in the gulf’s powerful loop current, it could wind up coating beaches in the Florida Keys and then be swept north along the state’s Atlantic coast.

New Jersey Democratic Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg said the spill calls into question the credibility of safety claims by the oil industry. In a letter citing government figures, they said that since 2006 there have been 509 fires on rigs in the gulf, causing at least two fatalities and 12 serious injuries – all before Deepwater Horizon.

“Big Oil has perpetuated a dangerous myth that coastline drilling is a completely safe endeavor, but accidents like this are a sober reminder just how far that is from the truth,” the two senators said.
Despite the spill, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Friday that President Barack Obama is still sticking to his plan to open up part of the eastern gulf and areas of the Atlantic seaboard to oil drilling.

Times researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report, which also includes information from the Associated Press.
_____________________________________________________
http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/water/oil-spill-in-gulf-could-threaten-florida/1090491
TampaBay.com
Oil spill in gulf could threaten Florida

By Craig Pittman, Times Staff Writer
In Print: Tuesday, April 27, 2010

An image taken from a NASA satellite on Sunday shows the Mississippi Delta on the tip of Louisiana at the center. The oil slick is a silvery swirl to the right.
[Associated Press]
On Monday, weathered oil is seen near the coast of Louisiana from a leaking pipeline caused by last week’s explosion and collapse of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the gulf.
An oil spill from a rig that sank off the coast of Louisiana is threatening marshes and beaches across the Gulf Coast, and unless it’s contained it could wind up tainting the Florida Keys and perhaps the state’s Atlantic coast, oceanography experts said Monday.

As of Monday, the slick was about 48 miles by 39 miles, lying some 30 miles off the coast of Louisiana. So far high winds have kept the spill away from land. It’s about 80 miles from the nearest Florida beaches in Pensacola.

But the owner of the rig has been unable to shut off the oil flowing from 5,000 feet below the surface, so the slick continues to grow.

The marshes of southern Louisiana and Mississippi appear to face the most immediate risk from the spill because they are closest to it, said George Crozier, director of the Dauphin Island Sea Laboratory in Mobile, Ala.

What happens after that depends on how quickly the owners of the rig can shut off the flow of oil. On Sunday they began using robot submarines to try to shut off a valve called a blowout preventer on a leaking pipe deep underwater. If that fails, then they will drill new wells on either side of the leak to relieve the pressure there – a process that could take months.
“If it goes on for four months, then yeah, we’ve got a problem,” Crozier said.
 “But if they’re able to shut it down after a day or two, then the risk is minimal.”

“We can only hope that they can make that sucker stop very soon,” said Wilton “Tony” Sturges , a retired Florida State University oceanographer. The winds that would push the spill toward Tampa Bay’s beaches do not normally start until midsummer, he noted.

Officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are predicting that by today the slick will be pushed more toward the east, away from the Panhandle but pointed more toward Florida’s peninsula.

Robert Weisberg, a University of South Florida oceanographer who specializes in studying the gulf, said that while the Panhandle may be safe, he is concerned that if the winds push it far enough to the east, the oil slick could be caught in the gulf’s powerful loop current. The loop current flows north from Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula but then makes a clockwise turn and flows south.

If that happens, Weisberg warned, then the oil could be carried “toward the Keys and points up the east coast.”

Florida Department of Environmental Protection officials are monitoring the spill, said DEP spokeswoman Dee Ann Miller, but “at this time there is not believed to be an immediate threat to Florida’s waters.”

Federal officials say they are doing their best to keep the growing oil slick from damaging any of the state’s beaches or marshes. “Our goal is to continue to fight this spill as far offshore as possible,” U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said at a news conference Monday.

One idea: Put a dome over the leaks to catch oil and route it to the surface, where it could be contained. That has worked before with shallow wells. No one knows if it would work 5,000 feet below the surface.

A pod of sperm whales was spotted near the slick on Sunday. At this point no one knows what effect the spill may have on them, although there is a risk of respiratory and eye irritation, or stomach and kidney problems if they ingest the oil, said Teri Rowles, coordinator of NOAA’s marine mammal stranding program.

Planes that were dropping chemicals that break down the oil were told to steer clear of the whales. The chemicals, known as dispersants, can be as toxic to mammals as the oil itself, marine biologist Jackie Savitz told the New York Times. So far there are no reports of any dead or injured animals in or near the slick.

The oil, which has been leaking at a rate estimated at 42,000 gallons a day, is coming from the site of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded about 11 p.m. on April 20 and later sank. Eleven members of the 126-member crew remain missing and are presumed dead. The cause of the explosion at the rig, which was under contract to BP, remains under investigation.

Initially Coast Guard officials said there appeared to be no leak from the sunken rig. But on Sunday they discovered oil was in fact leaking from pipes deep beneath the surface.
The rig’s owner, Transocean Inc., noted in a news release Monday that the rig – now on the sea floor about 1,500 feet northwest of the well center – was fully insured for $560 million. Transocean is the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor.

Information from the New York Times and the New Orleans Times-Picayune was used in this report.

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi