Palm Beach Post: Officials in Pensacola Bay frustrated with slow pace plan to protect delicate Florida marshes from oil spill

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/officials-in-pensacola-bay-frustrated-with-slow-pace-662094.html

By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Updated: 8:42 p.m. Sunday, May 2, 2010
Posted: 8:17 p.m. Sunday, May 2, 2010
Escambia County officials were still waiting late today for approval to begin an ambitious oil deflection project in Pensacola Pass as crude continues to spew from the sea floor and time to save delicate Florida marshes, birding habitats, oyster beds and bayous ticks away.
The so-called Unified Command – a conglomerate of government agencies and oil giant BP, headquartered in Louisiana – is reviewing Escambia’s proposal to lay 10,600 feet of protective boom in a V formation across a one-mile wide area between the Naval Air Station and Santa Rosa Island.
The delay is patience-testing for Escambia. Versed in hurricane preparation and protecting its shores, the area is used to taking care of itself.
Officials here say they understand a central command is necessary when dealing with the needs of so many states, but the wait is also part of a tangled communication challenge facing the massive attempt to save the Gulf Coast.
The frustration was audible in the voices of officials from other Florida counties this afternoon during a short phone briefing with the Department of Environmental Protection.
“We desperately need a liaison from DEP and BP,” said one Gulf County official with a thick southern drawl. “We just need people at the table as soon as possible.
Someone from Sarasota County asked if there would be any boom – which lies on the water’s surface to block the oil from reaching the shore – left for counties further down the Gulf coast after the Panhandle was taken care of.
Shipments are coming in daily, was the answer. Officials from Unified Command could not be reached for comment.
Escambia officials weren’t even sure this morning what areas of their coast were having boom set down, and they worked to get updates on the 19,000 feet laid today by private contractors. In total, 74,900 feet of boom stretches along Escambia’s coastline and inland waterways.
The project proposed for the mouth of Pensacola Bay would leave a 100-yard opening at the apex of the V so that the Coast Guard, and supply ships, including those carrying oil, could get through the federal waterway. As the oil funneled through the V, it would be collected on the other side. A second boom, made of absorbent material, would be placed behind the first to collect what sloshed over, or flowed underneath.
The booms would be removed when the tide goes out.
“We’ve got these natural choke points,” said Keith Wilkins, deputy bureau chief of Escambia County’s neighborhoods and community services bureau. “We are trying to work within the Unified Command system and within funding approvals for reimbursement either through BP or the federal government so we want to exhaust all of those pathways first. Once those are exhausted, we’ll decide whether we’ll take local action or not.”
Wilkins said it’s not feasible to completely close Pensacola Pass, which leads into several bayous and bays, including Pensacola Bay, Escambia Bay, Santa Rosa Sound, Bayou Grande, East Bay, Blackwater Bay and Mackey Bay.
Besides the shipping issue, the water flowing in runs at about 7 miles per hour. The booms aren’t very effective in water flowing above 2 miles per hour, he said.
But Chasidy Fisher Hobbs, executive director of the Emerald Coastkeeper environmental group, said she’s concerned the pass is being kept open solely for economic reasons.
“That’s where my frustration lies,” she said. “This is an emergency situation. I understand you don’t want to disrupt commerce, but what do they think will happen when all the oil comes washing in.”
About 40 people – one wearing a T-shirt that read; “The Hippies Were Right”- participated in a four-hour training session today to learn how to clean up oil-laden beaches. Another 450 are on a waiting list for upcoming sessions.
“I am sick, and I’m scared about potentially what is about to happen,” said Rick Bullock, a surfer and surfboard shaper for Waterboyz surf shop in Pensacola. “The domino effect to the fishing industry will be devastating.”
Today, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also announced it was closing fishing for a minimum of 10 days in federal waters most affected by the BP oil spill, including areas about 40 miles off Pensacola Bay.
Anticipating the loss of Gulf fishing, people crowded into Joe Patti’s Seafood market in Pensacola near Sanders Beach . They hauled coolers and took numbers so they could pack their freezers in case seafood supply is cut off. Joe Patti’s, which has been around since the 1930s, was out of salmon by early afternoon.
Alice Guy, the seafood market’s general manager, said if they can no longer fish the gulf, they’ll find other areas to fish.
“We will be very saddened,” she said, if fishing shuts down. “We’ve been around a long time, and encountered various obstacles. Nothing ever like this though.”

Associated Press: Obama to do everything “humanly possible on spill” & NOAA Closes Commercial and Recreational Fishing in Oil-Affected Portion of Gulf of Mexico & Oil Spill Claims Info

Special thanks to Richard Charter

ALLEN G. BREED and SETH BORENSTEIN / The Associated Press
2010-05-02 08:12:36

VENICE, La. (AP) — No remedy in sight, President Barack Obama on Sunday warned of a “massive and potentially unprecedented environmental disaster” as a badly damaged oil well a mile deep in the Gulf of Mexico spewed a widening and deadly slick toward delicate wetlands and wildlife. He said it could take many days to stop.

Obama rushed to southern Louisiana to inspect forces arrayed against the oil gusher as Cabinet members said the situation was grave and insisted the administration was doing everything it could.

Mindful of the political damage suffered by President George W. Bush for a slow response after Hurricane Katrina ravaged the same region, Obama defended his administration’s actions, saying it had been preparing for the worst from “day one” even as it had “hoped for the best.”

The president vowed that the administration, while doing all it could to mitigate the environmental and economic disaster, would require well-owner BP America to bear all costs.

“BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill,” Obama, with rain dripping from his face, said in Venice, a Gulf Coast community serving as a staging area for the response.

More on the spill:

On Sunday, BP’s chairman defended his company’s safety record and said “a failed piece of equipment” was to blame for a massive oil spill along the Gulf Coast.

BP PLC chairman Lamar McKay told ABC’s “This Week” that he can’t say when the well a mile beneath the sea might be plugged. But he said he believes a dome that could be placed over the well is expected to be deployed in six to eight days.

The dome has been made and workers are finishing the plan to get it deployed, McKay said. He said BP officials are still working to activate a “blowout preventer” mechanism meant to seal off the geyser of oil.

“And as you can imagine, this is like doing open-heart surgery at 5,000 feet, with — in the dark, with robot-controlled submarines,” McKay said.

BP spokesman Bill Salvin said McKay was talking about the blowout preventer as the failed equipment that caused the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which killed 11 people. The blowout preventer typically activates after a blast or other event to cut off any oil that may spill.

The cause of the blast remains undetermined, and Salvin said “we’re not ruling anything out.”

Crews have had little success stemming the flow from the ruptured well on the sea floor off Louisiana or removing oil from the surface by skimming it, burning it or dispersing it with chemicals. The churning slick of dense, rust-colored oil is now roughly the size of Puerto Rico.

Adding to the gloomy outlook were warnings from experts that an uncontrolled gusher could create a nightmare scenario if the Gulf Stream current carries it toward the Atlantic.

Long tendrils of oil sheen made their way into South Pass, a major channel through the salt marshes of Louisiana’s southeastern bootheel that is a breeding ground for crab, oysters, shrimp, redfish and other seafood.

Venice charter boat captain Bob Kenney lamented that there was no boom in the water to corral the oil, and said BP was “pretty much over their head in the deep water.”
“If they weren’t, they would have cut the oil off by now,” he said.

“It’s like a slow version of Katrina,” he added. “My kids will be talking about the effect of this when they’re my age.”

About a half-dozen fishing vessels sailed Sunday morning through the marshes of coastal St. Bernard Parish in eastern Louisiana, headed for the Biloxi Wildlife Management area. The oyster and shrimp boats, laden with boom, hoped to seal off inlets, bayous and bays.

There is growing criticism that the government and oil company BP PLC should have done more to stave off the disaster, which cast a pall over the region’s economy and fragile environment. Moving to blunt criticism that the Obama administration has been slow in reacting to the largest U.S. crude oil spill in decades, the White House dispatched two Cabinet members to make the rounds on the Sunday television talk shows.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on “Fox News Sunday” that the government has taken an “all hands on deck” approach to the spill since the BP oil well ruptured.

Napolitano said that as BP officials realized more oil was spewing than first thought, the government has coordinated federal, state and local resources with the oil company’s response.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that it could take three months before workers attain what he calls the “ultimate solution” to stopping the leak — drilling a relief well more than 3 miles below the ocean floor.

However, as the spill surged toward disastrous proportions, critical questions lingered: Who created the conditions that caused the gusher? Did BP and the government react robustly enough in its early days? And, most important, how can it be stopped before the damage gets worse?

The Coast Guard and BP have said it’s nearly impossible to know exactly how much oil has gushed since the blast, though it has been roughly estimated the well was spewing at least 200,000 gallons a day.

Even at that rate, the spill should eclipse the 1989 Exxon Valdez incident as the worst U.S. oil disaster in history in a matter of weeks. But a growing number of experts warned that the situation may already be much worse.

The oil slick over the water’s surface appeared to triple in size over the past two days, which could indicate an increase in the rate oil is pouring from the well, according to one analysis of images collected from satellites and reviewed by the University of Miami. While it’s hard to judge the volume of oil by satellite because of depth, images do indicate growth, experts said.

“The spill and the spreading is getting so much faster and expanding much quicker than they estimated,” said Hans Graber, executive director of the university’s Center for Southeastern Tropical Advanced Remote Sensing.

In an exploration plan and environmental impact analysis filed with the federal government in February 2009, BP said it had the capability to handle a “worst-case scenario” at the site, which the document described as a leak of 162,000 barrels per day from an uncontrolled blowout — 6.8 million gallons each day.

Oil industry experts and officials are reluctant to describe what, exactly, a worst-case scenario would look like. But if the oil gets into the Gulf Stream and carries it to the beaches of Florida — and potentially loops around the state’s southern tip and up the eastern seaboard — several experts said it stands to be an environmental and economic disaster of epic proportions.

“It will be on the East Coast of Florida in almost no time,” Graber said. “I don’t think we can prevent that. It’s more of a question of when rather than if.”

The concerns are both environmental and economic. The fishing industry is worried marine life will die — and that no one will want to buy products from contaminated water anyway. Tourism officials are worried vacationers won’t want to visit oil-tainted beaches. And environmentalists are worried about how the oil will affect the countless birds, coral and mammals in and near the Gulf.

“We know they are out there,” said Meghan Calhoun, a spokeswoman from the Audubon Aquarium of the Americas in New Orleans. “Unfortunately, the weather has been too bad for the Coast Guard and NOAA to get out there and look for animals for us.”
Fishermen and boaters want to help but have been hampered by high winds and rough waves that render oil-catching booms largely ineffective. Some coastal Louisiana residents complained that BP was hampering mitigation efforts.

“No, I’m not happy with the protection, but I’m sure the oil company is saving money,” said 57-year-old Raymond Schmitt, in Venice preparing his boat to take a French television crew on a tour.

And the oil on the surface is just part of the problem. Louisiana State University professor Ed Overton, who heads a federal chemical hazard assessment team for oil spills, worries about a total collapse of the pipe inserted into the well. If that happens, there would be no warning and the resulting gusher could be even more devastating.

“When these things go, they go KABOOM,” he said. “If this thing does collapse, we’ve got a big, big blow.”

BP has not said how much oil is beneath the seabed Deepwater Horizon was tapping. A company official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the volume of reserves, confirmed reports that it was tens of millions of barrels.

Obama has halted any new offshore drilling projects unless rigs have new safeguards to prevent another disaster.

As if to cut off mounting criticism, on Saturday White House spokesman Robert Gibbs posted a blog entitled “The Response to the Oil Spill,” laying out the administration’s day-by-day response since the explosion, using words like “immediately” and “quickly,” and emphasizing that Obama “early on” directed responding agencies to devote every resource to the incident and determining its cause.

In Pass Christian, Miss., 61-year-old Jimmy Rowell, a third-generation shrimp and oyster fisherman, worked on his boat at the harbor and stared out at the choppy waters.

“It’s over for us. If this oil comes ashore, it’s just over for us,” Rowell said angrily, rubbing his forehead. “Nobody wants no oily shrimp.”

___

Borenstein reported from Washington; Associated Press writers Tamara Lush, Brian Skoloff, Melissa Nelson, Mary Foster, Michael Kunzelman, Chris Kahn, Vicki Smith, Janet McConnaughey, Alan Sayre, Cain Burdeau and AP Photographer Dave Martin contributed to this report. 

BREAKING NEWS
—–Original Message—–

From: Laurel Bryant <Laurel.Bryant@noaa.gov>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 14:36:51
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;<Invalid address>
Subject: [Fwd: NOAA News: NOAA Closes Commercial and Recreational Fishing in  Oil-Affected Portion of Gulf of Mexico]

Dear NOAA Fisheries Constituents and Stakeholders,

Below, please find NOAA’s announcement and map of an emergency closure of fisheries in federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico being most affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.  We are working to schedule a stakeholders conference-call for sometime this next week. An e-mail notice will be sent out as soon as a time can be scheduled. All details of the closure can be found at: http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/.

Should you have any questions, please contact me at Laurel.Bryant@noaa.gov.  You may also direct questions to Russ Dunn, National Policy Advisor for Recreational Fisheries,at Russell.Dunn@noaa.gov.

For daily oil spill updates from NOAA, please visit www.noaa.gov.

Contact:         Kim Amendola     FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                 727-403-6533                       May 2, 2010

 NOAA Closes Commercial and Recreational Fishing in Oil-Affected Portion of Gulf of Mexico
NOAA is restricting fishing for a minimum of ten days in federal waters most affected by the BP oil spill, largely between Louisiana state waters at the mouth of the Mississippi River to waters off Florida’s Pensacola Bay (map attached). The closure is effective immediately.  Details can be found here:  http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/. Fishermen who wish to contact BP about a claim should call 800-440-0858.

“NOAA scientists are on the ground in the area of the oil spill taking water and seafood samples in an effort to ensure the safety of the seafood and fishing activities,” said Dr. Jane Lubchenco, NOAA Administrator, who met with more than 100 fishermen in Louisiana’s Plaquemines Parish on Friday night.  “I heard the concerns of the Plaquemines Parish fishermen as well other fishermen and state fishery managers about potential economic impacts of a closure. Balancing economic and health concerns, this order closes just those areas that are affected by oil. There should be no health risk in seafood currently in the marketplace.”

 “We stand with America’s fisherman, their families and businesses in impacted coastal communities during this very challenging time. Fishing is vital to our economy and our quality of life and we will work tirelessly protect to it,” said Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke.  NOAA is a bureau of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

The federal and state governments have strong systems in place to test and monitor seafood safety and to prohibit harvesting from affected areas and keeping oiled products out of the marketplace. NOAA Fisheries is working closely with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the States to ensure seafood safety, by assessing whether seafood is tainted or contaminated to levels that pose a risk to human health. 

“There are finfish, crabs, oysters and shrimp in the Gulf of Mexico near the area of the oil spill,” said Roy Crabtree, NOAA Fisheries Southeast Regional Administrator. “The Gulf is such an important biologic and economic area in terms of seafood production and recreational fishing.”

According to NOAA, there are 3.2 million recreational fishermen in the Gulf of Mexico region who took 24 million fishing trips in 2008.  Commercial fishermen in the Gulf harvested more than 1 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish in 2008.

NOAA is working with the state governors to evaluate the need to declare a fisheries disaster in order to facilitate federal aid to fishermen in these areas. NOAA fisheries representatives in the region will be meeting with fishermen this week to assist them. The states of Louisiana and Mississippi have requested NOAA to declare a federal fisheries disaster.  BP will be hiring fishermen to help clean up from the spill and deploy boom in the Gulf of Mexico.  Interested fishermen should call 425-745-8017.

NOAA will continue to evaluate the need for fisheries closures based on the evolving nature of the spill and will re-open the fisheries as appropriate.  NOAA will also re-evaluate the closure areas as new information that would change the dimension of these closed areas becomes available.

NOAA understands and predicts changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and conserves and manages our coastal and marine resources. Visit http://www.noaa.gov.
Oil Spill Claims Information

BP is now accepting claims for the Gulf Coast oil spill. Please call BP’s helpline at 1-800-440-0858.

See a BP fact sheet here for additional information (Click here to view fact sheet)

If you are not satisfied with BP’s resolution, there is an additional avenue for assistance available through the Coast Guard once BP has finalized your claim. Those who have already pursued the BP claims process can call the Coast Guard at 1-800-280-7118.

More information about what types of damages are eligible for compensation under the Oil Pollution Act as well as guidance on procedures to seek that compensation can be found below and at www.uscg.mil/npfc

For more information about the response and recovery efforts and to sign up for updates from the Joint Information Center, go to http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com

Types of Claims

Claim Type
Description
Who Can Submit

Natural Resource Damages (NRD)

Costs for:

Assessing an area’s
natural resource damages,
Restoring
the natural resources, and
Compensating
the public for the lost use of the affected resources.

Only specially designated natural resource trustees

Removal Costs

Costs to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or clean up an oil spill.

(The costs of cleaning up your own property fall under the category of property damage, not removal costs.)

Clean-up contractors, called Oil Spill Recovery Organizations (OSROs)
Federal, State, and local government entities
The responsible party
Anyone who helped clean up the spill

Property Damage

Injury to or economic loss resulting from destruction of real property (land or buildings) or other personal property.

Does not include personal injury!

People or entities who own or lease the damaged property

Boat Damage

Injury to or economic loss resulting from damage to a boat (a subset of property damage).

People or entities who own or lease the damaged boat

Loss of Profits & Earning Capacity

Damages equal to the loss of profits or impairment of earning capacity due to the injury, destruction, or loss of property or natural resources

Anyone with loss of profits or income (You do not have to own the damaged property or resources to submit a claim under this category.)

Loss of Subsistence Use of Natural Resources

Loss of subsistence use claim if natural resources you depend on for subsistence use purposes have been injured, destroyed, or lost by an oil spill incident.

Anyone who, for subsistence use, depends on natural resources that have been injured, destroyed, or lost (You do not have to own or manage the natural resource to submit a claim under this category.)

Loss of Government Revenue

Net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees, or net profit shares due to the injury, destruction, or loss of real property, personal property, or natural resources

Federal agencies
States
Local governments

Increased Public Services

Net costs of providing increased or additional public services during or after removal activities, including protection from fire, safety, or health hazards, caused by a discharge of oil or directly attributable to response to the oil spill incident

States
Local governments

Claim Format

There is no required format for claims. You must, however, support your claim with documentation, put the claim in writing, and sign it.

Background

The primary source of revenue for the fund is a nine-cents per barrel fee on imported and domestic oil. Collection of this fee ceased on December 31, 1994 due to a “sunset” provision in the law. Other revenue sources for the fund include interest on the fund, cost recovery from the parties responsible for the spills, and any fines or civil penalties collected. The Fund is administered by the U.S. Coast Guard’s National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC).

The Fund can provide up to $1 billion for any one oil pollution incident, including up to $500 million for the initiation of natural resource damage assessments and claims in connection with any single incident. The main uses of Fund expenditures are:

State access for removal actions;
Payments to Federal, state, and Indiantribe trustees to carry out natural resource damage assessments and restorations;
Payment of claims for uncompensated removal costs and damages; and
Research and development and other specific appropriations.

 Structure of the Fund
The OSLTF has two major components.

1.     
The Emergency Fund is available for Federal On-Scene Coordinators (FOSCs) to respond to discharges and for federal trustees to initiate natural resource damage assessments. The Emergency Fund is a recurring $50 million available to the President annually.
2.     
The remaining Principal Fund balance is used to pay claims and to fund appropriations by Congress to Federal agencies to administer the provisions of OPA and support research and development.

Carl Hiaasen/Miami Herald: Gulf spill can kill our tourist season

http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/05/01/1607537/gulf-spill-can-kill-our-tourist.html

special thanks to Richard Charter

By Carl Hiaasen
chiaasen@MiamiHerald.com

Oops.

That’s the official position of British Petroleum.

It turns out that oil is gushing from that blown-out rig off the Louisiana coast at a flow of at least 5,000 barrels a day, five times more than BP first estimated.

Oh, and if you’re keeping count, by Friday there were three leaks — not two — in the mile-long pipe that connected the platform to the wellhead.

The slick is larger than Rhode Island, and a shift of wind is pushing it into the wetlands of bayou country, imperiling birds, marine life and commercial fishing. Tourist beaches in Alabama and northwest Florida are also at risk.

Barely a month ago, President Obama announced plans to expand offshore oil operations in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and along the Atlantic coast as far south as central Florida.

Fabulous idea!

It won’t bring down the price of gasoline one penny at the pump, and it won’t yield enough crude oil to light up America for even a year — but, hey, what harm could it do?

Oops.

The oil companies know how to find oil, and they sure know how to drill. The only part of the underwater operation that they haven’t really nailed down is how to clean up their spills.

Soon after the Deepwater Horizon rig caught fire and sank, killing 11 workers, BP sent remote-controlled submarines to shut a master valve near the source of the outflow. It didn’t work.

Plan B is to dig a relief well in the hopes of intercepting the oil before it reaches the fractured pipe. Plan C is to plug up the spewing hole with mud, concrete or a heavy liquid.

At a depth of 5,000 feet, either project will take weeks or months, during which time the oil would continue leaking.

Meanwhile, as this column is being written, BP is lighting parts of the Gulf of Mexico on fire, to burn off some of the slick. So much for high-tech.

The company is also assembling an extremely large dome — I swear — that engineers could lower to the ocean floor and place over the leak in an attempt to capture the oil.

Maybe when they’re done, they can give it to Wile E. Coyote so he can use it to trap the roadrunner.

BP says everything possible is being done to stop the leak and contain the spill. That’s probably true, which is sobering.

Despite all the assurances from Big Oil and the politicians who are in its pocket, the technology of undersea drilling is dangerously lagging when it comes to protecting the coastal communities whose economies depend on clean water, clean beaches and healthy fisheries.

Last week, BP’s chief executive, Tony Hayward, tried to ease the fears of Gulf residents by saying that the approaching layer of oil was as light as “iced tea.”

Good luck trying to sell that line: “Hey, folks, that brown stuff all over the beach? Don’t think of it as tar. Think of it as Snapple.”

On Friday, with the spill blooming into a disaster, the White House announced that no new offshore drilling will be authorized until the Louisiana incident is fully investigated.

Under the plan announced in March by Obama, drilling in Florida’s eastern Gulf would expand, but remain at least 125 miles offshore. On the Atlantic side, rigs could be erected within sight of the coast.

In Tallahassee, where Big Oil’s lobbyists have been spreading gobs of money, several geniuses in the Legislature will next year continue their push to permit drilling within five miles of some prime Florida beaches.

Perfectly safe, they say. Ya’ll just relax.

Two days after exploding, the Deepwater Horizon went down on April 22 about 50 miles from mainland Louisiana. It took only a week after that for the first streaks of oil to reach the shore.

Miles of protective booms have been laid along the marshes. Officials are considering cannon fire to scare away birds, so they don’t land in the goo. Another idea is to recruit local shrimp boats as oil skimmers.
Because BP hasn’t been able to cap the leak, the Obama administration is sending U.S. military assistance. In other words, the Louisiana spill is an official emergency.

If it had happened near Jacksonville or Daytona Beach, Naples, Sarasota, Key West . . .

Oops.

By all means, let’s surround Florida — a virtual hurricane magnet — with drill rigs. According to the U.S. Minerals Management Service, hurricanes Rita and Katrina destroyed 113 gulf platforms, damaged 457 pipelines and caused 146 spills that dumped 17,652 barrels of petroleum.

One medium-sized blowout could trash miles of shoreline and kill a tourist season. Nothing sells seaside hotel rooms like YouTube videos of gunk-covered turtles and dead pelicans.

This is a no-brainer. Florida can’t afford offshore drilling. The risk to the economy is ludicrous, compared to the relatively small amounts of oil to be found.

With the crud from the Louisiana accident slopping ashore, Obama should fly down to experience the scene first-hand. I’m sure someone will help scrape the “iced tea” off his flip-flops. 
more:  http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/05/01/1607537/gulf-spill-can-kill-our-tourist.html#ixzz0mjWemqbE

Mother Nature Network: EPA launches website on oil spill

http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/site/2931/
Mother Nature Network
May 1, 2010

special thanks to Richard Charter

 http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/computers/blogs/epa-launches-website-on-oil-spill

The Deepwater Horizon incident is set to surpass the Exxon Valdez spill as the worst oil disaster in U.S. history. The EPA, the Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security are providing breaking updates and resources online.

The entire world is now looking to the EPA for guidance, explanations and emergency resources for Gulf residents who are bracing for what experts predict will be the worst oil spill in U.S. history. In hasty response, the EPA just put up a “damage control” web page which provides breaking updates and resources for those living in the affected areas.
 
Lisa Jackson, the EPA administrator, just flew over the area a few hours ago (you can follow her updates on Twitter @lisapjackson) and has dispatched two Trace Atmospheric Gas Analyzers or TAGA’s to test the impacts on air quality as toxic vapors threaten several densely populated areas, including New Orleans. Here’s what Lisa Jackson has to say:

We are taking every possible step to protect the health of the residents and mitigate the environmental impacts of this spill. For several days, EPA has been on the ground evaluating air and water concerns and coordinating with other responding agencies. We are also here to address community members  the people who know these waters and wetlands best. They will be essential to the work ahead.

The EPA site casts a little light on information about water testing and what is being done to curtail the oil slick as it impacts protected wildlife reserves and coastal towns on the Gulf, but an adjunct website called DeepwaterHorizonRepsonse.com
 http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/site/2931/
has a great photo gallery of tactics being used to capture oil before it hits land  like oil-absorbent pads and underwater booms. It provides recent reports from the Coast Guard, NOAA, the Department of Homeland Security and BP.
 
The Deepwater website also has some great video, but unfortunately the U.S. government doesn’t do YouTube, so video can only be viewed if you have a special plugin which doesn’t work on a Mac. Still a great resource though … check it out

Sea Turtle Restoration Project: Peak Nesting of Endangered Sea Turtles Threatened by Oil Spill

From: Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation [mailto:CTURTLE@LISTS.UFL.EDU] On Behalf Of Christopher Pincetich
Special thanks to Richard Charter

Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:16 PM
To: CTURTLE@LISTS.UFL.EDU
Subject: Read until the end for full scientist statement Re: Oil Spill
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – April 20,2010
 
Contact:                        Dr. Chris Pincetich, Sea Turtle Restoration Project
                                    (415) 663-8590 x102; cell (530) 220-3687; chris@tirn.net
 
                                    Carole Allen, Sea Turtle Restoration Project
                                    (281) 444-6204; carole@seaturtles.org
 
 
Peak Nesting of Endangered Sea Turtles Threatened by Oil Spill
 
Peak migration and nesting season could be devastated
 
April 30, 2010 – Galveston Texas
 
The recovery of endangered Kemp’s ridley sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico faces a dramatic set-back as oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill impacts coastal areas during their peak migration to nesting beaches. Scientists and conservation workers that have invested decades of work towards the sea turtles’ recovery are concerned about the growing impacts the oil slick and oiled beaches will have on these imperiled creatures.
 
“I have great concern for the environmental impact the spill will have on our fragile coast.” says Dr. Andre Landry, Jr. of Texas A&M University’s Sea Turtle and Fisheries Ecology Research Lab. “We are entering the prime time within the ridley nesting season in which adult females will be in nearshore waters nesting 3 to 4 times every 14 to 21 days.”
 
There are five species of endangered and threatened sea turtles in the Gulf, but this area represents one of the Kemp’s ridley’s only foraging and migration routes to their last remaining nesting beaches in Texas and Mexico.  At least 33 dead or dying Kemp’s ridleys have recently washed up on Texas beaches, but these causalities are more likely linked to shrimp trawl activities along the coast.
 
“My satellite tracking data for both juvenile and adult ridleys reveal a strong loyalty to the Texas coast and eastward to the mouth of the Mississippi River,” says Dr. Landry. Oil from the spill has landed on Lousiana shores already, and wildlife managers are scrambling to respond.
 
While berms and booms to deflect and catch oil are installed in the Brenton National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, the majority of coastal areas remain unprotected from the impending environmental devastation. As oil moves east toward Florida beaches, the oil spill could impact nesting of loggerhead and green sea turtles. The west coast of Florida is the largest nesting area for loggerheads, currently proposed to be reclassified as endangered from threatened in the Endangered Species Act because of continued threats and population declines. Green sea turtles are already listed as endangered and take up to 20 years to reach sexual maturity and begin nesting. But the current concern is focused on the endangered Kemp’s ridley, which is the smallest of the sea turtles and the only species to regularly nest during the day.
 
“This spill could not have come at a worse time for migrating and nesting Kemp’s ridleys. I am outraged that shrimp trawling has increased in Louisiana in anticipation of an oil closure, their careless actions kill hundreds of endangered turtles each year.” says Carole Allen, Gulf Director of the Sea Turtle Restoration Project and founder of HEART (Help Endangered Animals Ridley Turtles).
 
Ironically, the oils spill has occurred during the review of the NOAA Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sa Turtle, which states that at the current rate of recovery this endangered sea turtle may be reclassified down to threatened status by 2015. Carol Allen and Dr. Landry both have expressed concern that the current draft Plan fails to prioritize the importance of increased protections to assist the sea turtle recovery along Gulf and Texas migration, foraging, and nesting habitats. While the majority of these turtles nest in Mexico, the expansion of the population into Texas is already occurring.
 
The recent deaths of these endangered sea turtles on Texas shores and the impending devastation of the oil spill will likely highlight the importance of the Gulf waters to their continued survival.
 
**************************
 
Statement of Dr. Andre M. Landry, Jr. of Texas A&M University’s Sea Turtle and Fisheries Ecology Research Lab on April 30, 2010.
 
“I have great concern for the environmental impact the spill will have on our fragile coast. I am particularly concerned about potential damage to sea turtle assemblages that forage and nest along the Louisiana coast, especially within Breton Sound, the Chandeleur Islands and eastward toward other barrier island beaches and their wetland fringes that extend to the Florida Panhandle and areas such as Cedar Key. This is particularly an acute concern for the endangered Kemp’s ridley sea turtle whose ongoing recovery is putting increasingly larger abundances of juveniles in our nearshore waters adjacent to tidal passes, beachfronts and within our bays in search of their preferred prey, the blue crab. At the same time, we have adult female ridleys using nearshore waters as a migratory corridor through which they are traveling to nest along the Texas and Mexico coasts. We are entering the prime time within the ridley nesting season (1 April through 15 July) in which adult females will be in nearshore waters nesting 3 to 4 times every 14 to 21 days. My satellite tracking data for both juvenile and adult ridleys reveal a strong loyalty to these habitats, especially along the Texas coast and eastward to the mouth of the Mississippi River. I regret that we have not had an opportunity (i.e., financial support) to characterize sea turtle use of waters east of the Delta but see no reason why they too are not important foraging grounds (especially) and, in the case of barrier island beaches, potential nesting areas.”
 
 
 
Christopher Pincetich, Ph.D.
Campaigner & Marine Biologist, Sea Turtle Restoration Project
(415) 663-8590, ext. 102
P.O. Box 370, Forest Knolls, CA 94933 USA
Location: 9255 Sir Francis Drake Blvd, Olema, CA 94950
Viisit the STRP Action Center to help with all current campaigns.
Join the Sea Turtle Restoration Project on Facebook Causes

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi