Washington Post: EPA informs BP to use less toxic chemicals to break up oil spill

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/20/AR2010052002142.html?hpid=topnews
 
The dispersants they were using at unprecented volumes will undoubtedly have extensive long term impacts on the marinelife in the water column and benthic community of the Gulf, beyond the impact of the oil itself.  This was scientifically proven prior to the blow-out.   It’s about time….DV 

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 20, 2010; 10:10 AM
The Environmental Protection Agency informed BP officials late Wednesday that the company has 24 hours to choose a less toxic form of chemical dispersants to break up its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, according to government sources familiar with the decision, and must apply the new form of dispersants within 72 hours of submitting the list of alternatives.
The move is significant, because it suggests federal officials are now concerned that the unprecedented use of chemical dispersants could pose a significant threat to the Gulf of Mexico’s marine life. BP has been using two forms of dispersants, Corexit 9500A and Corexit 9527A, and so far has applied 600,000 gallons on the surface and 55,000 underwater.
“Dispersants have never been used in this volume before,” said an administration official who asked not to be identified. “This is a large amount of dispersants being used, larger amounts than have ever been used, on a pipe that continues to leak oil and that BP is still trying to cap.”
The new policy applies to both surface and undersea application, according to sources, and comes as the EPA has just posted BP’s own results from monitoring the effect that underwater application of chemical dispersants has had in terms of toxicity, dissolved oxygen and effectiveness
.
The EPA declined to comment on the matter.
After BP conducted three rounds of testing, federal officials approved the use of underwater dispersants late last week, but environmentalists and some lawmakers have questioned the potential dangers of such a strategy.
On Monday, Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) sent a letter to EPA administrator Lisa P. Jackson questioning the approach, given that Britain banned more than a decade ago some formulations of the dispersant, Corexit, that is now being used.
In the letter, Markey warned, “The release of hundreds of thousands of gallons of chemicals into the Gulf of Mexico could be an unprecedented, large and aggressive experiment on our oceans, and requires careful oversight by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other appropriate federal agencies.”

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Washington County News: Fla Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) hears updated on oil spill response

Didn’t read anything about putting out booms NOW. ……….to protect the fragile coral reef ecosystem of the Keys.   What are they waiting for?  DV
May 20, 2010 12:56 PM

Florida is open for business. This was the recurring theme at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC) emergency workshop May 19 in St. Pete Beach. The Commission met to discuss agency plans and actions and public concerns related to the ongoing Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

“We need to let the world know Florida is open for business,” FWC Chairman Rodney Barreto told more than 100 people and media representatives attending the meeting. “Our beaches are open, hotels are open, and commercial and recreational fishing is open.”

Barreto emphasized that Florida has had absolutely no impacts from the oil spill and that the current spill trajectories show no impacts in the immediate future.

The Commissioners heard reports from FWC staff and state and federal agency partners on the status of the oil spill. They also learned what the FWC and other agencies are doing in response.

“It’s all hands on deck for wildlife,” Barreto said.

Capt. Tim Close of the U.S. Coast Guard, the lead federal agency for oil spill response, gave the Commission a status report on the oil spill. Timyn Rice of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the state’s designated lead agency in this effort, commended BP for stepping up to the plate to provide all necessary resources. Rice acknowledged the response has been a collaborative effort. 

FWC division leaders reported that the agency has established two-way communications with fishermen, assessed legal options, and conducted scientific pre-impact sampling of wildlife, habitats and fisheries. 

After the staff reports, Commissioners opened the floor to public comment. Representatives from various groups expressed frustration about oil affecting their livelihoods and the possibility of oil impacts on fish and wildlife. But the speakers’ biggest concern involved the lack of accurate information reaching the public.

Barreto received applause from the audience when he said, “Let’s spend a little of BP’s money and get the information out there” about fishery openings and closings. He also stressed the importance of quickly putting into action the $25 million BP gave to the state to promote tourism. “We need to launch an advertising campaign that targets both Floridians and potential visitors to Florida.” 

Meanwhile, staff reported that the FWC is ready to act should oil in any form move into Florida waters.

Mark Robson, director of the FWC’s Division of Marine Fisheries Management, said the FWC will close fisheries only if there are clear and compelling reasons. The FWC will close only the smallest area needed and reopen areas as quickly as possible. Commissioners gave Robson the green light to that approach.

Col. Jim Brown, director of the FWC’s Division of Law Enforcement, assured the Commission by stating, “The division is experienced in emergency response.  The governor has declared a State of Emergency from Escambia County down to Sarasota County, and FWC teams are prepared to assist if oil comes ashore.”

Gil McRae, director of the FWC’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) in St. Petersburg, said FWRI uses digital maps that pinpoint areas important for wildlife. These maps guide response efforts.

Oil spill response partners are conducting observation flights to monitor fish and wildlife and to help identify the changing oil boundary.

FWC experts are imbedded in all Unified Command Centers around the Gulf.

Because of the impact to red snapper season, the FWC is working with NOAA to collect data to redouble sampling efforts of recreational species – a major priority for the FWC. Commissioner Brian Yablonski said if the FWC and NOAA can establish that the fishing effort is much lower than normal, the FWC may be able to consider a supplemental season.

            For the latest updates on the oil spill and Florida’s response, go to MyFWC.com/OilSpill or www.dep.state.fl.us/deepwaterhorizon. These sites contain information on where and how to report oiled wildlife or shorelines, provide information on volunteer opportunities and link to the Florida Emergency Operations Center daily reports.

Miami Herald: Florida Keys dodge tar ball bullets, but oil spill enters loop current

I find it highly unusual that the “experts”  found tarballs on four beaches in the Keys.    And now the tests of the tarball samples, which could have been air shipped instead of sending them on a jet to deliver  them,  still can’t confirm where they came from.  A friend indicated that the oil will undergo changes as it is carried in the currents.   I am not convinced the tarballs weren’t from the BP Blowout.   DV

http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/05/19/v-print/1636938/officials-florida-keys-tar-balls.html#ixzz0oU7u9MIt
 

Posted on Wed, May. 19, 2010
BY TOLUSE OLORUNNIPA And CAROL ROSENBERG
crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com

TIM CHAPMAN/MIAMI HERALD STAFF
Jennifer DeMaria picks up garbage off the wild shoreline on Big Pine Key on Wednesday.
News spread quickly Wednesday that tar balls found on beaches in the Lower Florida Keys were not from the Gulf of Mexico spill, a welcome reprieve for residents still fearful about the fate of their vacation mecca.

The development was tempered by a Coast Guard announcement that “a small portion” of Deepwater Horizon’s oil slick had entered the Gulf’s loop current and could reach the Florida Straits in seven or eight days.    Or, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association bulletin reported at day’s end, “the oil may get caught in a clockwise eddy in the middle of the gulf, and not be carried to the Florida Straits at all.”
It all added to an air of uncertainty about how and when the Sunshine State would grapple with fallout from the gulf catastrophe that could threaten both the state’s fragile ecosystem as well as its lifeblood industry: tourism.

“That’s a concern and we are monitoring it,” Gov. Charlie Crist told The Miami Herald editorial board, adding that state officials still have no fixed date on when spill pollution might hit the Keys, or anywhere else.   The governor said he had been in touch with federal officials, among them White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett.   He said he could deploy up to 2,500 National Guard members, if need be, under a state of emergency he declared last month for the Florida Panhandle — and was considering widening the emergency sector to include Monroe County and possibly Miami-Dade.

Wednesday’s developments offered a mixed message — relief on the one hand that the catastrophe had not yet come to Florida, but dread that it still might come.  The Coast Guard outpost in the Keys revealed that it had rushed samples to its lab in Groton, Conn., by Falcon jet from Miami and determined that 50 or so three- to eight-inch tar balls did not come from the Deepwater Horizon.

It said the findings were conclusive, even as the source of the spill that spawned the tar balls remained unknown.    Specially trained pollution-control experts scooped up the hazardous waste on Monday and Tuesday in four locations: Smathers Beach in Key West; Big Pine Key; Loggerhead Key in the Dry Tortugas National Park, and the Fort Zachary Taylor State Park.

On Wednesday, Jeff Bryant, 44, was among a knot of swimmers at a near-empty beach cleared by rain showers at Fort Zachary Taylor.  “The tar balls aren’t from the Gulf, but we still could see oil remnants here,” said Bryant, a Key West resident who was gripping flippers and a heavy oxygen tank. “I’m hoping for the best, but my mind keeps going to the worst-case scenario.”

Monroe County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Becky Herrin, likewise, said she was relieved to learn that this week’s oil contaminants hadn’t come from the Deepwater Horizon. But, she said, “You have to keep in mind we’re still preparing for the possibility and keeping a close eye.”

And so Keys environmentalists redoubled efforts to organize coastal cleanups to clear the shores of litter that, if mixed with contaminated oil, could become toxic along the 120-mile string of islands that stretch south of Miami, part of a fragile interdependent ecosystem of mangroves and seagrass. “Preemptively removing artificial debris from the shoreline of the preserve will reduce potential impacts from oil, and it is good for the environment in any event,” a Nature Conservancy of Florida statement said, asking volunteers with kayaks and canoes to help clean up Little Torch Key on Saturday.

From Washington, Miami Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, whose district includes the Keys, lamented that the tar ball discovery had triggered “premature panic” and issued a stern warning: “It is imperative that the Coast Guard and other national agencies work to ensure that information related to the path of the spill is delivered in a timely fashion.”

Constituent Jodi Weinhofer, president of the Keys Lodging Association, reported that the anxious tourist industry was in “wait-and-see mode” with “all the plans in place on how to manage this.”   She added that she was assured that the Coast Guard lab finding reinforced earlier NOAA reports that the currents had not yet brought the slick from the oil spill to South Florida. “The good news is that the information that we’ve been getting is accurate,” she said. “And that’s big. It’s really encouraging.”

Miami Herald staff writers Sergio Bustos, Jennifer Lebovich and Kenny Malone contributed to this report.

AP: Syrupy oil washed into La. marshes for first time

Associated Press
May 20, 2010

 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_8559/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=AK8JaqtP

GRAND ISLE, La. (AP) – The spectacle many had feared for a month finally began unfolding as gooey, rust-colored oil washed into the marshes at the mouth of the Mississippi for the first time, stoking public anger and frustration with both BP and the government.

The sense of gloom deepened as BP conceded what some scientists have been saying for weeks: that the oil leak at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico is bigger than the company previously estimated.

Up to now, only tar balls and a sheen of oil had come ashore. But on Wednesday, chocolate brown and vivid orange globs, sheets and ribbons of foul-smelling oil the consistency of latex paint began coating the reeds and grasses of Louisiana’s wetlands, home to rare birds, mammals and a rich variety of marine life.

There were no immediate reports of any mass die-offs of wildlife or large numbers of creatures wriggling in oil, as seen after the Exxon Valdez disaster, but that was the fear.

Billy Nungesser, president of Louisiana’s Plaquemines Parish, toured the oil-fouled marshes Wednesday and said: “Had you fallen off that boat yesterday and come up breathing that stuff, you probably wouldn’t be here.”

A live video feed of the underwater gusher, posted online Thursday after lawmakers exerted pressure on BP, is sure to fuel the anger.

It shows what appears to be a large plume of oil and gas still spewing into the water next to the stopper-and-tube combination that BP inserted to carry some of the crude to the surface. The House committee website where the video was posted promptly crashed because so many people were trying to view it.

“These videos stand as a scalding, blistering indictment of BP’s inattention to the scope and size of the greatest environmental catastrophe in the history of the United States,” said Rep. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass.

At least 6 million gallons have gushed into the Gulf – more than half the amount the Exxon Valdez tanker spilled in Alaska in 1989 – since the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform exploded 50 miles off the coast April 20. Eleven workers were killed.

The slow-motion disaster could become far wider. Government scientists said a small portion of the slick had entered the so-called loop current, a stream of fast-moving water that could carry the mess into the Florida Keys and up the state’s Atlantic Coast, damaging coral reefs and fouling beaches.

“It’s anger that the people who are supposed to be driving the ship don’t have any idea what’s going on,” E.J. Boles, a musician from Big Pine Key, Fla., said of both BP and the government. “Why wouldn’t they have any contingency plan? I’m not a genius, and even I would have thought of that.”

BP spokesman Mark Proegler told The Associated Press that the mile-long tube inserted into the leaking well pipe over the weekend is capturing 210,000 gallons of oil a day – the total amount the company and the Coast Guard had estimated was gushing into the sea – but that some is still escaping. He would not say how much.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said an interagency team using ships and planes is working on a new estimate of how much oil is gushing from the well. Agency officials would not speculate on how big the leak might be.

Washington, meanwhile, turned up the pressure on BP.

The Obama administration asked the company to be more open with the public by sharing such information as measurements of the leak and the trajectory of the spill. BP has been accused of covering up the magnitude of the disaster.

Also, the Environmental Protection Agency directed BP to employ a less toxic form of the chemical dispersants it has been using to break up the oil and keep it from reaching the surface.

BP is marshaling equipment for an attempt as early as Sunday at a “top kill,” which involves pumping heavy mud into the top of the blown-out well to try to plug the gusher. A top kill has been used before above ground, but like other methods BP is exploring, it has never been attempted 5,000 feet underwater.

If it doesn’t work, the backup plans include a “junk shot” – shooting golf balls, shredded tires, knotted rope and other material into the well to clog it up.

But Chris Roberts, a member of Louisiana’s Jefferson Parish Council, complained bitterly: “We don’t have time for BP to use the Gulf of Mexico as an experiment.”

BP officials have said repeatedly that no one could have predicted or prepared for such a disaster. But some lawmakers and others aren’t buying it.

Commercial fisherman Pete Gerica of New Orleans, a member of the Louisiana Seafood Promotion and Marketing Board, said the oil industry “needed to have a better tool box.” As for the government, he said, “The watchdog people failed us miserably.”

In Washington, environmental groups urged the government to take greater control of the situation from BP.

“The Gulf of Mexico is a crime scene,” said Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation, “and the perpetrator cannot be left in charge of assessing the damage.”
___
Associated Press writers Mike Kunzelman, Kevin McGill, Greg Bluestein and Janet McConnaughey in Louisiana, Ben Evans in Washington, Holbrook Mohr in Mississippi, and Tamara Lush and Matt Sedensky in Florida contributed to this report.
___
Online:
 http://globalwarming.house.gov/spillcam

Ancorage Daily News: Lawsuit by stockholders filed against BP in Alaska

Anchorage Daily News
May 20, 2010

 http://www.adn.com/2010/05/20/1287470/lawsuit-against-bp-filed-in-alaska.html

By BECKY BOHRER
The Associated Press
Published: May 20th, 2010 04:24 PM
Last Modified: May 20th, 2010 04:25 PM

JUNEAU — BP stockholders are suing top company officials, claiming in a lawsuit filed in Alaska that “gross mismanagement” has tarnished the company’s reputation and hurt its value.

The lawsuit, filed in Superior Court in Anchorage on Thursday, alleges officials did not take the necessary steps to ensure BP compliance with safety rules and environmental safeguards. It cites cases including last month’s oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico and concerns that U.S. lawmakers raised earlier this year about BP operations on Alaska’s North Slope.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, and appointment of an “independent corporate monitor” to implement safety and environmental compliance measures.

Named defendants include BP chief executive Tony Hayward and members of BP’s board of directors.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi