Public Citizen: Come out to Protest BP at its Washington DC headquarters at noon this Friday

http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=183

Protest BP this Friday in D.C.!

Join activists from Public Citizen, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Energy Action Coalition, Hip Hop Caucus, 350.org, Chesapeake Climate Action and Center for Biological Diversity.

Click here to let us know you plan to attend.

And check out our Facebook event page for the protest, where you can connect with other activists: Citizen’s Arrest at BP Headquarters, Washington, D.C.

WHAT: Demonstration and citizen’s arrest at BP’s Washington, D.C., headquarters

WHEN: Friday, June 4, at 12:00 p.m.

WHERE: BP headquarters, 1101 New York Ave., NW, Washington, D.C.

Meet at the green space right across the street from BP’s office building at 11:45 a.m. We’ll have signs, but we encourage you to bring your own.

Join us at noon on Friday to hold BP accountable for its crimes!

Thank you for your commitment and your action,

Allison Fisher
Organizer, Energy Program

P.S. If you haven’t yet, take the “Beyond BP” pledge to boycott BP at www.BeyondBP.org and join our Facebook group 1,000,000 Strong to Boycott BP.

To get regular e-alerts about opportunities for activism and other ways to help with Public Citizen’s work, sign up for the Public Citizen Action Network.

University Corporation for Atmospheric Research: Ocean currents likely to carry oil along Atlantic coast

http://www2.ucar.edu/news/ocean-currents-likely-to-carry-oil-spill-along-atlantic-coast

June 03, 2010

BOULDER—A detailed computer modeling study released today indicates that oil from the massive spill in the Gulf of Mexico might soon extend along thousands of miles of the Atlantic coast and open ocean as early as this summer. The modeling results are captured in a series of dramatic animations produced by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and collaborators.

This animation shows one scenario of how oil released at the location of the Deepwater Horizon disaster on April 20 in the Gulf of Mexico may move in the upper 65 feet of the ocean. This is not a forecast, but rather, it illustrates a likely dispersal pathway of the oil for roughly four months following the spill. It assumes oil spilling continuously from April 20 to June 20. The colors represent a dilution factor ranging from red (most concentrated) to beige (most diluted).  The dilution factor does not attempt to estimate the actual barrels of oil at any spot; rather, it depicts how much of the total oil from the source that will be carried elsewhere by ocean currents. For example, areas showing a dilution factor of 0.01 would have one-hundredth the concentration of oil present at the spill site.
The animation is based on a computer model simulation, using a virtual dye, that assumes weather and current conditions similar to those that occur in a typical year. It is one of a set of six scenarios released today that simulate possible pathways the oil might take under a variety of oceanic conditions. Each of the six scenarios shows the same overall movement of oil through the Gulf to the Atlantic and up the East Coast. However, the timing and fine-scale details differ, depending on the details of the ocean currents in the Gulf. The full set of six simulations can be found here. (Visualization by Tim Scheitlin and Mary Haley, NCAR; based on model simulations.) 

The research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor. The results were reviewed by scientists at NCAR and elsewhere, although not yet submitted for peer-review publication.

“I’ve had a lot of people ask me, ‘Will the oil reach Florida?’” says NCAR scientist Synte Peacock, who worked on the study. “Actually, our best knowledge says the scope of this environmental disaster is likely to reach far beyond Florida, with impacts that have yet to be understood.”

The computer simulations indicate that, once the oil in the uppermost ocean has become entrained in the Gulf of Mexico’s fast-moving Loop Current, it is likely to reach Florida’s Atlantic coast within weeks. It can then move north as far as about Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, with the Gulf Stream, before turning east. Whether the oil will be a thin film on the surface or mostly subsurface due to mixing in the uppermost region of the ocean is not known.

The scientists used a powerful computer model to simulate how a liquid released at the spill site would disperse and circulate, producing results that are not dependent on the total amount released. The scientists tracked the rate of dispersal in the top 65 feet of the water and at four additional depths, with the lowest being just above the sea bed.

“The modeling study is analogous to taking a dye and releasing it into water, then watching its pathway,” Peacock says.

The dye tracer used in the model has no actual physical resemblance to true oil. Unlike oil, the dye has the same density as the surrounding water, does not coagulate or form slicks, and is not subject to chemical breakdown by bacteria or other forces.

Peacock and her colleagues stress that the simulations are not a forecast because it is impossible to accurately predict the precise location of the oil weeks or months from now. Instead, the simulations provide an envelope of possible scenarios for the oil dispersal. The timing and course of the oil slick will be affected by regional weather conditions and the ever-changing state of the Gulf’s Loop Current—neither of which can be predicted more than a few days in advance. The dilution of the oil relative to the source will also be impacted by details such as bacterial degradation, which are not included in the simulations.

What is possible, however, is to estimate a range of possible trajectories, based on the best understanding of how ocean currents transport material. The oil trajectory that actually occurs will depend critically both on the short-term evolution of the Loop Current, which feeds into the Gulf Stream, and on the state of the overlying atmosphere. The flow in the model represents the best estimate of how ocean currents are likely to respond under typical wind conditions.

Picking up speed

Oil has been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico since April 20 from a blown-out undersea well, the result of an explosion and fire on an oil rig. The spill is located in a relatively stagnant area of the Gulf, and the oil so far has remained relatively confined near the Louisiana and Alabama coastlines, although there have been reports of small amounts in the Loop Current.

The model simulations show that a liquid released in the surface ocean at the spill site is likely to slowly spread as it is mixed by the ocean currents until it is entrained in the Loop Current. At that point, speeds pick up to about 40 miles per day, and when the liquid enters the Atlantic’s Gulf Stream it can travel at speeds up to about 100 miles per day, or 3,000 miles per month.

The six model simulations released today all have different Loop Current characteristics, and all provide slightly different scenarios of how the oil might be dispersed. The simulations all bring the oil to south Florida and then up the East Coast. However, the timing of the oil’s movement differs significantly depending on the configuration of the Loop Current.

The scenarios all differ in their starting conditions, a technique used in weather and climate forecasting to determine how uncertainty about current conditions might affect predictions of the future.

BP gulf oil spill model simulation
A still from the animation showing the oil trajectory after 130 days.

Additional model studies are currently under way, looking further out in time, that will indicate what might happen to the oil in the Atlantic.

“We have been asked if and when remnants of the spill could reach the European coastlines,” says Martin Visbeck, a member of the research team with IFM-GEOMAR, University of Kiel, Germany. “Our assumption is that the enormous lateral mixing in the ocean together with the biological disintegration of the oil should reduce the pollution to levels below harmful concentrations. But we would like to have this backed up by numbers from some of the best ocean models.”

The scientists are using the Parallel Ocean Program, which is the ocean component of the Community Climate System Model, a powerful software tool designed by scientists at NCAR and the Department of Energy. They are conducting the simulations at supercomputers based at the New Mexico Computer Applications Center and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

 June 03, 2010 

BOULDER—A detailed computer modeling study released today indicates that oil from the massive spill in the Gulf of Mexico might soon extend along thousands of miles of the Atlantic coast and open ocean as early as this summer. The modeling results are captured in a series of dramatic animations produced by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and collaborators.

This animation shows one scenario of how oil released at the location of the Deepwater Horizon disaster on April 20 in the Gulf of Mexico may move in the upper 65 feet of the ocean. This is not a forecast, but rather, it illustrates a likely dispersal pathway of the oil for roughly four months following the spill. It assumes oil spilling continuously from April 20 to June 20. The colors represent a dilution factor ranging from red (most concentrated) to beige (most diluted).  The dilution factor does not attempt to estimate the actual barrels of oil at any spot; rather, it depicts how much of the total oil from the source that will be carried elsewhere by ocean currents. For example, areas showing a dilution factor of 0.01 would have one-hundredth the concentration of oil present at the spill site.
The animation is based on a computer model simulation, using a virtual dye, that assumes weather and current conditions similar to those that occur in a typical year. It is one of a set of six scenarios released today that simulate possible pathways the oil might take under a variety of oceanic conditions. Each of the six scenarios shows the same overall movement of oil through the Gulf to the Atlantic and up the East Coast. However, the timing and fine-scale details differ, depending on the details of the ocean currents in the Gulf. The full set of six simulations can be found here. (Visualization by Tim Scheitlin and Mary Haley, NCAR; based on model simulations.)  [Download  high resolution video]

The research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor. The results were reviewed by scientists at NCAR and elsewhere, although not yet submitted for peer-review publication.

“I’ve had a lot of people ask me, ‘Will the oil reach Florida?’” says NCAR scientist Synte Peacock, who worked on the study. “Actually, our best knowledge says the scope of this environmental disaster is likely to reach far beyond Florida, with impacts that have yet to be understood.”

The computer simulations indicate that, once the oil in the uppermost ocean has become entrained in the Gulf of Mexico’s fast-moving Loop Current, it is likely to reach Florida’s Atlantic coast within weeks. It can then move north as far as about Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, with the Gulf Stream, before turning east. Whether the oil will be a thin film on the surface or mostly subsurface due to mixing in the uppermost region of the ocean is not known.

The scientists used a powerful computer model to simulate how a liquid released at the spill site would disperse and circulate, producing results that are not dependent on the total amount released. The scientists tracked the rate of dispersal in the top 65 feet of the water and at four additional depths, with the lowest being just above the sea bed.

“The modeling study is analogous to taking a dye and releasing it into water, then watching its pathway,” Peacock says.

The dye tracer used in the model has no actual physical resemblance to true oil. Unlike oil, the dye has the same density as the surrounding water, does not coagulate or form slicks, and is not subject to chemical breakdown by bacteria or other forces.

Peacock and her colleagues stress that the simulations are not a forecast because it is impossible to accurately predict the precise location of the oil weeks or months from now. Instead, the simulations provide an envelope of possible scenarios for the oil dispersal. The timing and course of the oil slick will be affected by regional weather conditions and the ever-changing state of the Gulf’s Loop Current—neither of which can be predicted more than a few days in advance. The dilution of the oil relative to the source will also be impacted by details such as bacterial degradation, which are not included in the simulations.

What is possible, however, is to estimate a range of possible trajectories, based on the best understanding of how ocean currents transport material. The oil trajectory that actually occurs will depend critically both on the short-term evolution of the Loop Current, which feeds into the Gulf Stream, and on the state of the overlying atmosphere. The flow in the model represents the best estimate of how ocean currents are likely to respond under typical wind conditions.

Picking up speed

Oil has been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico since April 20 from a blown-out undersea well, the result of an explosion and fire on an oil rig. The spill is located in a relatively stagnant area of the Gulf, and the oil so far has remained relatively confined near the Louisiana and Alabama coastlines, although there have been reports of small amounts in the Loop Current.

The model simulations show that a liquid released in the surface ocean at the spill site is likely to slowly spread as it is mixed by the ocean currents until it is entrained in the Loop Current. At that point, speeds pick up to about 40 miles per day, and when the liquid enters the Atlantic’s Gulf Stream it can travel at speeds up to about 100 miles per day, or 3,000 miles per month.

The six model simulations released today all have different Loop Current characteristics, and all provide slightly different scenarios of how the oil might be dispersed. The simulations all bring the oil to south Florida and then up the East Coast. However, the timing of the oil’s movement differs significantly depending on the configuration of the Loop Current.

The scenarios all differ in their starting conditions, a technique used in weather and climate forecasting to determine how uncertainty about current conditions might affect predictions of the future.

BP gulf oil spill model simulation
A still from the animation showing the oil trajectory after 130 days.

Additional model studies are currently under way, looking further out in time, that will indicate what might happen to the oil in the Atlantic.

“We have been asked if and when remnants of the spill could reach the European coastlines,” says Martin Visbeck, a member of the research team with IFM-GEOMAR, University of Kiel, Germany. “Our assumption is that the enormous lateral mixing in the ocean together with the biological disintegration of the oil should reduce the pollution to levels below harmful concentrations. But we would like to have this backed up by numbers from some of the best ocean models.”

The scientists are using the Parallel Ocean Program, which is the ocean component of the Community Climate System Model, a powerful software tool designed by scientists at NCAR and the Department of Energy. They are conducting the simulations at supercomputers based at the New Mexico Computer Applications Center and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

 

Deepwater Horizon Response: Contact BP with your suggestion for the spill clean-up

Here’s the link to the Central Command Center  Suggestions website:

http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/546759/

Here’s the link to the simple form to fill out:

http://www.horizonedocs.com/artform.php

It was easy; I sent in a suggestion to utilize bioremediation, i.e. oil-eating microbes especially for the Dry Tortugas and Florida Keys coral reefs. I’m sure they are getting lots of these and may or may not care/listen/respond.     DV

NY Times: Readers Suggest Fixes for Oil Spill

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/

June 3, 2010, 10:47 am

By ROBERT MACKEY

As my colleague William Broad reports, the United States is not planning to heed calls from armchair engineers to fire a nuclear weapon at the damaged BP well still gushing into the Gulf of Mexico — simply because, in the words of one official, “It’s crazy.” That said, as Mr. Broad notes, ideas about how to cap the well are flowing onto the Web nearly as fast as oil into the water.

While thinking outside the box, and even the bun, comes naturally to many Americans who spend a lot of time online, some of this brainstorming has been generated in response to requests for help from BP, the government and news organizations like CNN.

BP’s Web site has a “citizen response” section appealing for information and ideas. One blogger, a lawyer named Michael J. Evans who runs BPOilNews.com, reported this week that the company “finally opened a telephone hot line to take oil spill suggestions from the public.” He added:

Whether the suggestions will be seriously considered by BP remains to be seen, but I am happy to report that I had a satisfactory experience when I checked out the Oil Spill Suggestion Hot Line. When I called (281) 366-5511, the phone was actually answered by a live person (in my case, after only two rings) who was polite and actually seemed to be putting my information into a computer. The operator took my name, city and state of residence, ZIP code, telephone number, and e-mail address. She then asked for my suggestion and requested that I speak slowly so she could write it all down.

 

According to the “Suggestions” page of the Deepwater Horizon Unified Command Web site:

Thousands of people have submitted possible ideas on how to stop or contain the oil in the Gulf of Mexico. More than 20,000 ideas on how to stop the flow of oil or contain the oil spill have been sent to BP since the Gulf of Mexico incident. These ideas have flooded in from people across the world, ranging from ordinary members of the public to oil industry professionals, and in many languages from Arabic to Russian.

According to the site, “BP has implemented a process to review and evaluate all of these suggestions.” Callers are asked to submit their ideas in written form, and then each scheme “is sent for triage by a team of 30 technical and operational personnel who will review its technical feasibility and application.” Although “the technical review can take some time,” eventually:

Each idea is sorted into one of three categories:

* Not possible or not feasible in these conditions;
* Already considered/ planned or;
* Feasible.

The feasible ideas are then escalated for a more detailed review, potential testing and field application. So far, around 100 ideas are under further review.

CNN’s call for ideas encouraged readers of its Web site to “share a video or photo explaining your thoughts — bonus points for awesome visuals.” After several hundred responses came in, the network asked Bill Nye to explain why none of the suggestions for cleaning up the spill or capping the well were better than those already devised by experts.

After looking at several of the proposed solutions, Mr. Nye urged viewers to keep in mind that “the people working on these problems are engineers, these are people who nominally can do calculus, people who are very good at physics, people who’ve studied chemistry, people who have dedicated their lives to learning about nature, to learning about science, to learning about the process by which we understand the world.”

Although The Times has not joined CNN in soliciting ideas, that has not stopped our readers from submitting dozens of possible fixes in just the past week. My colleagues who usually field helpful notes about typos or angry screeds about split infinitives and our coverage of ethnic conflicts from readers of our Web site have lately been getting notes they’re filing under “I Know How to Fix the Oil Spill.”

Here, with some corrections of spelling errors, are a few of the more creative ideas to come over our transom in recent days:

Recently when they were widening the roadway 287, whenever they would use explosives they would lay a very heavy steel woven blanket over the area to protect the public. These blankets were 40’ x 40’ hoisted into place with cranes. Why not put several of these blankets over the hole then several steel roadway plates over them! Or why not just sink a ship over the hole! — C. Guntner

My dad, an old barge owner, suggests (and I concur with changes) that an upside-down barge (or I say circular, bowl-like object) filled with concrete (or other heavy material that pours into a mold, then hardens), is lowered onto sea floor on top of and encircling pipe end. Then other heavy objects added on top if needed until the pressure of escaping oil is equalized and spill stops. Further encapsulating and stabilizing measures can then be added to bunker the area down. — Pat Hoffstatter

Create, by sewing, a mile-long tube of impermeable fabric with enlarged ends, a two-ended funnel, the bottom end circus tent sized, the top lake-reservoir sized. The bottom is loosely floated over the leak, then tacked to the ocean floor. The top gradually fills with the rising oil-water mixture floating up to become a lake-reservoir held in place by buoys, increasingly oil rich, as the seal at the bottom is improved. The lake-reservoir is emptied continuously by a tanker fleet. CONTAMINATION OF THE GULF CEASES. — Dr. Lawrence F. Wasser

I came up with a SPINNING TOP PLUG with toggle clamps. The spinning top has grooves on it, like a tap and wings to make it spin from the oil flow. Once the top is over the the pipe, it is lowered very fast or dropped into the out flow pipe. And the toggles hole the top in place. It also has a movable coupling holding the SPINNING TOP SYSTEM. Good Luck. — Jim Fox

It is difficult to add a cap on top of a high-pressure tube. However, it is relatively easy to insert a long metal stick with a long thin tip and gradually increased radius and backward hooks into the well. First put the thin tip of the stick into the well and then push the stick into the well and let the thick part matching the well’s radius deeply into the well and the backward hooks to keep the stick in the well. — Xinhang Shen

I have one suggestion to stop oil flow. BP may consider using clay and/or sand in their top kill effort. These are natural constituents of the sea bed and perhaps heavier than oil. I am not an engineer or a geophysicist, but I am tossing with this idea. I am deeply concerned as is everybody and offer this naïve suggestion. — S.K. Dey

Please! Seal the Gulf Oil Leak quickly and at low cost by immediately dropping 100s to 1000s of tons of plastic bagged capsules of either cement/ concrete/ clay/ etc. select best available/effective material from readily available bottom door opening DREDGING BARGES towed to the site from nearby ports. – Jerry Pospisil

Could the riser pipe be squeezed shut, much as a soda straw be squeezed between thumb and finger? — Joe Kellen

I am engineer and I would like to suggest for BP to stop oil leak, an alloy of zinc of low-point fusion, like Zamak in Portuguese. — J.M. Solis

I LIVE IN RUSSIA. I KNOW HOW TO STOP CONTAMINATION OF MEXICAN BAY. I WOULD LIKE TO SELL THE IDEA. BUT I BADLY TALK FOR ENGLISH AND I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO CONTACT WITH GUIDANCE OF COMPANY. YOU WOULD NOT COULD TO ME HEREIN TO HELP. IT IS VERY GOOD IDEA. YOU WILL BE SORRY ME FOR BAD KNOWLEDGE OF ENGLISH. WITH KIND REGARDS. DMITRY

It seems the easiest solution would be to put a bladder on the end of a pipe, as far into the pipe as possible (to get past sharp edges). Pump air into the bladder, it’s done. The bladder can be designed to spread out into the pipe with the pressure from the oil.

Depending on how deep you have to go, you could also make it a mechanical seal instead of pumping air. Put the largest steel tube into the pipe that will still allow the oil to come out of the pipe, push a bladder through the tube, the bladder is anchored to the inner tube, like a parachute, oil pushes open the bladder. The bladder has to be designed to expand with the pressure.

Don’t know if it can be done, but from my armchair it seemed logical.
John Cole

I don’t pretend to be an expert with this type of problem. However, I remind myself of the story about the truck stuck under the bridge because it was a few inches too tall. As the experts and engineers devised elaborate plans to remove the bridge or cut away the truck, a child asked, why don’t you just let the air out of the tires?

Therefore, I submit two different ideas for consideration to slow or stop the flow of oil:

The first idea uses a large clamp to crimp or crush the pipe at the break. I envision a tool similar to the jaws of life used by Fire and Rescue workers to pull apart cars. The difference here being the machinery would squeeze instead of expand. This procedure isn’t the final solution, but could dramatically reduce the flow of oil until the relief wells can be completed.

The second idea is to provide a splice over the top of the break in the pipe. Similar to how plumbers fix breaks in water pipes. The splice plate could be equipped with additional pipes or hoses to relieve the pressure and draw the oil up to ships on the surface of the gulf. Again, this would not be the final fix, but could provide a temporary solution until the relief wells are completed. — Jim Viviano

Phoenix Sun: BP Update: Video grab shows riser pipe cut

http://thephoenixsun.com/archives/9943

After some setbacks, BP has successfully severed a riser pipe, preparing the way to lower a containment dome over the well in the Gulf of Mexico, that should, according to BP’s plan, capture a large quantity of the oil that has been gushing out of control since April 20th.  Operators are now (11:15 CDT) using a circular saw to smooth the edges of the pipe to ensure a tighter fit for the dome.

Special thanks to Osha Davidson

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi