http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=118852434823395

The President’s Council on Environmental Quality  is soliciting comments, questions, and other input on Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas exploration and development.   Deadline is June 17th, 2010.   Here’s the link for more info and to post your comments.  It’s easy… go for it.   DV 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq/initiatives/nepa/mms-review-submit

Here are the comments I submitted.  Feel free use any or all of it in your comments:

June 7, 2010

Associate Director for NEPA Oversight

Council on Environmental Quality

722 Jackson Place NW

Washington, DC 20503

Cc: hgreczmiel@ceq.eop.gov

Dear Sirs/Ms.

I write to you today as a native Floridian who has worked for the past 24 years to protect coral reefs from my home in Key West, Florida.  My husband and I founded Reef Relief, a small grassroots environmental organization and even received a Point of Light from President Bush Sr.  We have recently retired so what follows are my personal comments based on that experience.

Every year during that time, I travelled to Washington, D.C.  to meet with our Congressmen and deliver resolutions from all levels of government, business and conservation organizations in the Florida Keys opposing oil and gas development affecting the Florida Keys.  I participated in planning efforts and supported the Outer Continental Shelf Coalition comprised of organizations from all over America that actively worked to oppose the current policy of offshore oil and gas exploration and development in fragile marine areas along our coasts.  We consistently encouraged a progressive, thoughtful energy policy for America based on sustainable, renewable, nonpolluting sources such as solar and wind and promoted conservation of energy use by all Americans.

Now the worst case scenario is upon us as the BP blowout has escalated to the worst environmental catastrophe in America’s history.   What we have been saying all along has now been revealed in graphic detail to all Americans:  our country makes decisions on this important energy source while deliberately dominated  by corporate oil interests with little or no regard for our oceans, marine life and coral reefs that provide so much to all of us.  Not to mention the considerably economic value of our fisheries, tourism, and related industries throughout Florida, Alaska, and other fragile and valuable coastal areas.   As a result, American is entrenched in a serious oil habit, with little incentive for alternatives. 

Annual oil and gas development moratoriums were passed over the years, but no permanent protection has been achieved and now our worst fears have become a reality in the Gulf of Mexico.  And the Gulf Loop Current is carrying it into the Florida Keys.  It’s easy to say “I told you so.”  What’s more important right now is to get it right, before any more time passes and further losses are incurred.

I support and incorporate the following recommendations of the Center for Biologic Diversity as follows.  My  comments in italics expand upon those comments of the Center:

1. A full housecleaning at Interior and even the President’s staff  should begin now to replace all staff with direct ties to the oil and gas industry with qualified, knowledgeable candidates without a conflict of interest and a true desire to serve the public interest. Perhaps it should start with Mr. Salazar who knew or should have known what was going on in MMS. 

Remove former BP executive Sylvia Baca from her job as deputy assistant secretary for land and minerals management. Secretary Salazar expressed outrage at the Inspector General’s finding earlier this week that the revolving door between the oil industry and the Minerals Management Service has undermined the agency’s effectiveness and credibility. He did not mention, however, that in June 2009 he himself appointed a BP executive to oversee the Minerals Management Service.    “Sylvia Baca is a classic example of the revolving door between oil companies and the MMS,” said Suckling. “It was a terrible judgment call to appoint her; it is politically catastrophic to keep her. If Salazar is serious about reform, he needs to start with his own interest-conflicted appointments.”   2. Ban the use of environmental waivers for offshore exploration and production plans. Such waivers are designed for very small-impact projects such as constructing hiking trails and outhouses. There is no possible scenario in which an offshore drilling project – whether deepwater, ultradeepwater, or shallow water – can be considered a non-threat to the environment, economy, and endangered species.   It is actually a disservice to the bidders to allow plans that would be denied at a later phase of the permitting process to proceed any further than this point.  It creates an inference of acceptability when in fact, the plan may be inherently dangerous, faulty, environmentally flawed or otherwise inappropriate for the site proposed.

3. Rescind all drilling approvals issued with environmental waivers. Hundreds of dangerous offshore oil platforms are operating today in the Gulf of Mexico without having undergone any environmental review. These dangerous drilling projects are operating illegally and threaten the Gulf with additional oil spills. Just today, a new spill was cited in the Gulf. Is anyone in a position of authority doing any monitoring of current activities?  This should apply to Alaska oil industry operations as well.  Just last week a spill occurred along the Alaska pipeline that could have been prevented. Offshore platforms are not the only vulnerable oil and gas operations currently permitted by MMS.

4. Rescind the Interior Department’s plan to open up new areas on the Atlantic Coast, eastern Gulf of Mexico, and Alaska to offshore oil drilling. The president’s announcement, made on March 31, 2010, three weeks before the BP explosion, was made on the false premise that offshore oil drilling is safe.  Many of these areas have been under Congressional moratoria for years; there’s a good reason for protecting these valuable coastal areas and they are also inconsistent with certain existing military operations. And now we know we cannot depend upon false plans submitted by the industry that it can be done safely. 
5. Permanently ban all new offshore oil drilling, beginning in Alaska. As a nation, we need to transition to clean energy sources such as sun and wind as fast as possible. Pushing forward with new, dangerous, and dirty offshore oil drilling sends the wrong signal to energy companies and technology developers. Continued subsidizing of Big Oil is a major hindrance to our nation’s development of clean energy.  Florida is the Sunshine State; why isn’t solar a major industry here?  Public utilities should be encouraged by government policy to invest in solar instead of dangerous nuclear power, which still has no satisfactory long term disposal solution. 

6.  Require that current oil lessees fund the development and adoption of safe, alternative oil spill planning and deployment technologies such as microbes and other emerging solutions to oil pollution.  Oil spill response and deployment planning is glaringly absent from the advances so proudly espoused by the oil industry.  The same strategies that were used 30 years ago are still being relied upon by the industry for the Gulf spill today without regard to the consequences of drilling deeper.  The dispersant being used by BP is banned in the UK, and is deathly for coral reef ecosystems. Using dispersants in areas with coral reefs and other highly productive ocean environments destroys all sea life exposed to it; it is taken up into the food chain as it settles on the bottom; it prevents new growth on the bottom and smothers all existing life, and then creates  residual continuing impacts on marine life reproduction and growth patterns for generations.   The  strategy of letting oil come ashore beaches and then cleaning it up is counterproductive and ineffective. Oil is still found in the sand along the shore in Valdez. It should be removed at the source of the spill immediately.  Burning oil on the surface creates unacceptable air pollution consequences.  Plans should be implemented immediately rather than waiting for accidental oil spills to damage marinelife and shorelines. If we must allow drilling while we transition to sustainable energy sources, it should be contingent on ecofriendly spill and blowout cleanup plans.

7. End all tax exemptions and advantages to the oil and gas industry, which pays less in U.S. taxes than the average American family.   There is no rationale for global energy giants to receive tax breaks from our country when we are in an economic crisis.  All royalties due to the US by such companies should be closely monitored for compliance and payments enforced in a timely manner.  This oversight has been sadly lacking on the part of MMS.

8.  Insure complete press access to spill sites. Freedom of the press is the hallmark of our democracy.   Currently, reporters are being excluded from BP spill sites on the basis of safety, yet they will not let clean-up workers wear masks. And the U.S. Coast Guard is helping to enforce their private rules to public shorelines.   This is a double standard designed to restrict public knowledge of their actions. Workers going to the hospital for treatment of spill-related symptoms have their clothes confiscated by BP.    

9.  Increase government oversight of how the cleanup operations occur.  Even as President Obama says he is in control, BP continues to do as it pleases.  We should encourage the utilization of local, onsite knowledgeable resources with the capacity to implement cleanup plans immediately.  BP,  for example,  is using one firm to treat injured seabirds, when in fact, there are local organizations in all coastal areas that have the facilities, expertise and ability to do so.   This should apply to injured sea turtles and dolphins as well.  Local boaters in the Florida Keys could be mobilized to boom off all the wildlife refuges and coral reefs.   Supporting the local economy is the least the oil giants could do in the event of a spill that impacts many coastal economies.

10.  Invest in an aggressive program of developing renewal energy for America and encourage all Americans to conserve energy.  Now.   

Thank you for the opportunity to present my viewpoint. I hope you can improve government especially as it relates to offshore oil and gas development in America.  There is no better time. 

Very truly yours,

DeeVon Quirolo 

dquirolo@gmail.com

1223 Royal Street

Key West, Florida 33040

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/06/07/gulf.oil.plume/?hpt=T1

St. Petersburg, Florida (CNN) — As if the pictures of birds, fish and animals killed by floating oil in the Gulf of Mexico are not disturbing enough, scientists now say they have found evidence of another danger lurking underwater.

The University of South Florida recently discovered a second oil plume in the northeastern Gulf. The first plume was found by Mississippi universities in early May.

USF has concluded microscopic oil droplets are forming deep water oil plumes. After a weeklong analysis of water samples, USF scientists found more oil in deeper water.

“These hydrocarbons are from depth and not associated with sinking degraded oil but associated with the source of the Deep Horizon well head,” said USF Chemical Oceanographer David Hollander.

Through isotopic or microscopic fingerprinting, Hollander and his USF crew were able to show the oil in the plume came from BP’s blown-out oil well. The surface oil’s so-called fingerprint matched the tiny underwater droplet’s fingerprint.

“We’ve taken molecular isotopic approaches which is like a fingerprint on a smoking gun,” Hollander said.

BP has not commented on the latest development but in the past denied underwater oil plumes exist.

“The oil is on the surface,” said BP’s Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward. “There aren’t any plumes.”

Yet BP’s Managing Director Bob Dudley said recently, “We’re all absolutely taking these ideas seriously and looking at them.”

Scientists on board the university’s research vessel Weatherbird II were not able to find the dissolved hydrocarbon or oil by sight. Instead the crew received sensor signatures from the equipment deployed into the water since the plumes appear to be clear.

USF is unsure on the exact size of the plumes.

“There are indications this is fairly wide spread,” said the USF oceanographer. “There is probably more than one leg of this plume.”

Scientist are concerned what effect the oil, not to mention the dissolvents used to break up the oil, will have on marine life.

Laboratory tests show bacteria have begun eating some elements of the dissolved hydrocarbons. But the effect on fish “is what needs to be understood,” said Hollander. “We are in uncharted territory.”

Water samples collected by USF were sent to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration labs. NOAA has yet to comment on their conclusions.

NOAA and USF will hold a joint press conference Tuesday morning at the university’s St. Petersburg campus to release their final findings.

Special thanks to Craig Q

Going on a tip from Sky Truth, world renowned photographer Henry Fair, SouthWings pilot Tom Hutchings and Hurricane Creekkeeper, John L. Wathen Flew a photo mission over the BP Slick and beyond. At about 12 miles off the mouth of the Mississippi River we encountered another leaking oil rig! The plume was either coming from the drilling operation or the boat itself. In any case it is large enough to be reported.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWHLrcxLVkg
Spread it around
John L. Wathen
Hurricane Creekkeeper,
Friends of Hurricane Creek

Members of
WATERKEEPER Alliance
http://www.waterkeeper.org

Who has the authority to say someone else
is not being a good steward of the environment?

Anyone who notices.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

June 7th, 2010

This post was received from a “friend of the wilderness” who wishes not to be identified, but tells a revealing story about how oiled seabirds are treated in Louisiana.  DV

I returned from Ft. Jackson after days with Tri-State and IBRRC.  Very impressive, hard-working and organized groups I might add.  They were contracted by BP to handle the oiled wildlife (some exceptions like sea-turtles, dolphins etc). 

I will tell you that when I arrived last Monday morning there had been about 52 birds processed to date (excuse the word ‘process’ – I couldn’t think of another).  Some  wild guesses would be that they had maybe 25 still there and 14 of those were taken on Saturday by Fish and Wildlife to be released somewhere in Florida. .. the turn around time being around 10 days.
 
That was the entire spill total after what, 5 weeks?  Something seemed very wrong, at least to us few volunteers (the rest were all staff from California, Delaware and elsewhere).   But…..
 I think it was Thursday night……….they started coming by truck, boat and helicopter.  It was like MASH.
 

By the time I left last night (Sunday night) there were over 300 badly oiled birds logged, mostly pelicans, (and during their nesting season).  They are the lucky ones.  The staff was busy building new cages, adapting the physical plant to accommodate the space needed and bringing in more staff and volunteers.    Think of over 300 mostly pelicans, badly oiled or recuperating, in one place.  Their fish needs alone are staggering.
 
It was very hard work.  If I were 30 again I would still be there.  But I am going back.