Category Archives: natural resource management

Public Citizen: On the Obama-Abe Summit, Regarding TPP

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 24, 2014
9:31 AM

CONTACT: Public Citizen

Lori Wallach
(202) 454-5107 lwallach@citizen.org

WASHINGTON – April 24 – “Ironically, if missing this do-or-die moment for the TPP seals its demise, then what will be characterized as a failure now may in fact save President Obama’s legacy, given that the TPP would cause more American job offshoring, greater income inequality and higher medicine prices.

After years of missed deadlines, unbending opposition by other nations to many U.S. proposals and scores of deadlocked TPP issues, Congress’ refusal to grant President Obama trade authority, growing opposition in many nations, and now Obama and Abe not announcing a breakthrough, TPP should be ready for burial. Instead, like some movie monster that will not die, TPP is being animated by a broad coalition of powerful corporate interests and we are told talks will continue.

Even if the continuing bilateral negotiations resolve U.S.-Japan auto and agricultural trade issues, there are scores of other deep deadlocks in TPP negotiations. This includes deep disputes on medicine patent and government drug reimbursement rate policies that would affect healthcare costs; limits on financial regulation, food safety and Internet freedom; disciplines on state owned enterprises; the expansion of investor protections that subject domestic laws to attack by corporations in foreign tribunals; and environmental and labor standards. As well, 60 U.S. Senators and 230 U.S. Representatives have insisted that TPP include enforceable disciplines on currency manipulation, but other TPP countries oppose this and to date the issue had not been addressed.”
###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 to represent consumer interests in Congress, the executive branch and the courts.

Tampa Bay Times: Oil company drilling in sanctuary fined $25,000 for violation that could be fracking by Craig Pittman

Craig Pittman, Times Staff Writer

Friday, April 18, 2014 7:44pm

The Texas company that stirred controversy by applying to drill for oil in Florida panther habitat was doing more with one of its wells than what its state permit allowed.
Related News/Archive

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection on Friday afternoon revealed that it had fined the Dan A. Hughes Co. $25,000 for violating its permit. The violation involves using a process that sounds like fracking — although the word “fracking” appears nowhere in either Friday’s DEP news release or the legal paperwork about the fine from 10 days earlier.

Instead, the 12-page consent order, dated April 8, says DEP officials became concerned about a “workover operation” that the Texas company launched without DEP permission in late December 2013. The well site is on an island surrounded by the National Audubon Society’s Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, a major nesting site for wood storks. DEP officials told Hughes to stop right away.

Determining exactly what the company did is difficult because the DEP censored that part of the order, labeling it “a confidential trade secret.”

However, the DEP news release says Hughes “proposed an enhanced extraction procedure that had not previously been used in Florida. The company proposed to inject a dissolving solution at sufficient pressure to achieve some openings in the oil-bearing rock formation that would be propped open with sand in pursuit of enhancing oil production.”

That matches the dictionary definition of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking: “the forcing open of fissures in subterranean rocks by introducing liquid at high pressure, especially to extract oil or gas.” Florida Petroleum Council executive director David Mica said it may mean Hughes was fracking, or it could mean it used one of several similar procedures.

Fracking has helped the United States vastly expand its production of natural gas by allowing greater access to reserves once considered too difficult to tap. However, scientists have expressed concern that the chemicals used in fracking may pose an environmental threat. Studies of fracking sites in Texas, Pennsylvania and Wyoming found elevated levels of arsenic in the groundwater, and Ohio geologists found a probable connection between fracking and a sudden burst of mild earthquakes.

The DEP’s order, which resulted from negotiations with Hughes officials, says the company must provide an “estimate of the total amount of flowback material” from the injection and explain where and how it disposed of it. The types of chemicals used were not named.

The order also says the Texas company must put in four monitoring wells to watch for any pollution spreading beyond its drilling site that might contaminate drinking water wells.

The company also must pay for independent experts to consider “the potential for injected or native fluids to migrate through the deep geological formations or the well casing into surrounding groundwater-bearing zones” —in other words, the aquifer.

DEP officials would say little about the order and did not respond to a reporter’s request to interview Ed Garrett, who heads up the oil and gas permit program. Hughes officials did not return repeated calls. Neither did anyone from Collier Resources, which owns the land.

Joe Mule, as president of Preserve Our Paradise, has led protests against a DEP permit allowing Hughes to drill on the edge of the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge as well as about 1,000 feet from the nearest occupied home in Naples’ Golden Gate Estates neighborhood. He said nobody from the DEP had told him or his neighbors of what the company had done.

Neither the DEP nor Hughes disclosed the violation during a recent hearing on the Golden Gate permit, said Preserve Our Paradise attorney Ralf Brookes.

Florida is not exactly Texas, where oil fields produced 588 million barrels of crude last year. But there are geological formations in the Panhandle and the area west of Lake Okeechobee that produced more than 2 million barrels in 2012.

As of last count there were 156 active wells in Florida, and the oil they pump out provided $700 million in tax revenue for the state. The oldest oil field is in Collier County, where the company that’s now Exxon drilled its first well in 1942.

Rising oil prices in recent years have spurred a push to increase drilling in Florida, and Hughes has been in the forefront. Last year the company boasted, “Hughes has been in the business of drilling oil and gas wells for over 50 years and enjoys an exemplary reputation as a domestic and international operator.”

Times researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report. Craig Pittman can be reached at craig@tampabay.com. Follow him on Twitter at @craigtimes.

New Jersey 101.5 radio: Seismic Testing Proposal Off NJ Coast Gets Resistance

http://nj1015.com/seismic-testing-proposal-off-nj-coast-gets-resistance-audio/

By Ilya Hemlin April 17, 2014 8:36 AM

A proposal for seismic testing off the coast of New Jersey is getting pushback from environmental groups and legislators for not only its potential danger to the ocean and the commercial fishing industry, but the possibility of opening the door for offshore oil drilling.

(Toniann Antonelli, Townsquare Media NJ)
A proposal submitted by Columbia University as well as other universities, including Rutgers, to the National Marine Fisheries Service asks for permission to conduct marine seismic surveys 15 miles off the coast of Barnegat this summer. The purpose for the work would be to study climate change.

During a press event at the Belford Seafood Cooperative on Wednesday, Congressman Frank Pallone (D-6th) and Clean Ocean Action president Cindy Zipf admonished the proposal and called for a 60-day extension to the public comment period.

“We’d like to have Columbia and the other universities involved in this explain why they’re doing this and why,” Pallone said.

Zipf said when she first got wind of the proposal, she noticed it was nearly identical to one for testing for oil and natural gas deposits.

“The decibel range, the loud ocean blasts are the same,” Zipf said. “The purpose is to go down and evaluate sediment between 30 and 60 million years ago, to look for climate change affects. That depth also includes the depth where there is methane hydrates.

Methane hydrates are frozen natural gas, so they will be assessing, whether they know it or not, the energy potential in that area.”

While the Obama administration has said it will consider offshore drilling south of Delaware, Pallone worries the results of the study will be obtained by oil industries and begin to open the door for drilling in the mid-Atlantic.

“If they do the seismic testing, not only is the fear on my part that it would be used to justify offshore oil and gas drilling, but also the impact on marine life and commercial fishing it would have,” he said.

Zipf warns, if approved, seismic cannons would be fired off underwater every five seconds.

“The sound waves are orders of magnitude louder than a jet engine taking off, and they’ll happen every day, 24/7, for 30 days,” Zipf said.

While Zipf said neither she nor Clean Ocean Action opposes scientific research, it shouldn’t be done with so much economic and environmental detriment.

“We all know it’s wrong to tap on an aquarium because it scares the fish and that’s just a tap on the glass,” she said. “This is going to be devastatingly torturous loud noise. Core sample studies were already conducted several years ago and provided similar information.”
Read More: Seismic Testing Proposal Off NJ Coast Gets Resistance [AUDIO] | http://nj1015.com/seismic-testing-proposal-off-nj-coast-gets-resistance-audio/?trackback=tsmclip

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Expansion of California Marine Sanctuaries Announced Today

Media Advisory, April 14, 2014
Contact: Richard Charter
Senior Fellow, Coastal Coordination Program, The Ocean Foundation
707 875-2345, 707 875-3482, waterway@monitor.net

The long-awaited expansion of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries northward from Bodega Bay to Pt. Arena, a decision that will add 2700 square miles of protected waters, has been announced today, accompanied by the dates and locations of upcoming public hearings in the affected communities and the release of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

“Three decades of bipartisan pressure from mayors, county officials, fishing interests, state legislators, congressional representatives, U.S. Senators, and every sitting California governor have finally led us to today’s historic announcement”, said Richard Charter, Senior Fellow with The Ocean Foundation, “The people have spoken, and the White House is apparently listening.”

The Northern California coast between Bodega Bay and Pt. Arena attracts millions of visitors and is the centerpiece of the region’s economy, hosting one of the planet’s four most productive ocean upwelling systems, in which nutrient-rich waters rise from the depths to provide the base of the marine food chain which embraces a globally significant, extraordinarily diverse, and productive marine ecosystem that supports abundant wildlife and valuable fisheries.

Upcoming Public Hearings:

May 22, 2014, Sausalito, 6 pm-U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bay Model Visitor Center, 2100 Bridgeway Blvd., Sausalito, CA 95465

June 16, 2014, Point Arena, 6 pm-Point Arena City Hall, 451 School Street, Point Arena, CA 95468

June 17, 2014, Gualala, 6 pm-Gualala Community Center, 47950 Center Street, Gualala, CA 95445

June 18, 2014, Bodega Bay, 6 pm-Grange Hall, 1370 Bodega Avenue, Bodega Bay, CA 94923
To comment online go to: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/04/14/2014-08061/proposed-expansion-and-regulatory-revision-of-gulf-of-the-farallones-and-cordell-bank-national

Written comments will be accepted until June 30, 2014, and should be sent to: Maria Brown, Superintendent, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, 991 Marine Drive-The Presidio, San Francisco, CA 94129.

More details can be found at: http://SanctuaryExpansion.org

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Santa Rosa Press Democrat: Federal officials release plans to expand North Coast sanctuaries

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20140414/articles/140419753#page=0

Santa Rosa, California

By GUY KOVNER
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
April 14, 2014, 1:19 PM

Permanent protection from oil drilling off the Sonoma and southern Mendocino County coast appears imminent, anti-drilling advocates and local officials said Monday, as a federal agency unveiled a plan to expand two protected areas along the scenic shoreline. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a plan to more than double the size of two marine sanctuaries, extending their northern boundary from Bodega Bay more than 60 miles north to Point Arena. Offshore oil or gas exploration, development and production would be prohibited throughout the expanded sanctuaries, a holy grail sought by environmentalists since the late 1970s.

“This particular victory for the ocean was 35 years in the making,” said Richard Charter of Bodega Bay, a veteran coastal protection advocate.
A marine sanctuary is “really the only tool we have that can protect this coast in perpetuity,” said Charter, a senior fellow with the Ocean Foundation. The sanctuary expansion, first suggested by the federal agency in 2008, is still not a done deal and probably would not be implemented until the winter or spring of 2015. But it doesn’t require a vote by Congress, and Charter, a lobbyist in Washington, D.C., said he does not anticipate any reversal.

Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo, whose district covers most of the Sonoma coast, called Monday’s announcement “truly marvelous.” Sanctuary rules allow recreational and commercial fishing, while the ban on energy development protects a coast that draws more than 1 million visitors a year, “spending the almighty dollar there,” Carrillo said.

Former Rep. Lynn Woolsey of Petaluma warned that “anything can happen” on Capitol Hill, but took pride in the likely expansion. “I have great faith that my legacy is intact,” said Woolsey, who retired last year after 20 years in Congress. For nearly half of her tenure, Woolsey waged an unsuccessful campaign to expand the sanctuaries through legislative action. With Congress deadlocked, Woolsey said the White House had assured her it would handle the matter.

The latest proposal was unveiled by the Obama administration in late 2012. It enjoyed enthusiastic support from local residents at a public meeting at Bodega Bay’s Grange Hall in January 2013, with Woolsey earning a hearty applause from the crowd.

The lone lament from environmentalists on Monday was that the proposed expansion stops just north of Point Arena, about 15 miles north of the Sonoma-Mendocino line. In community meetings last year, Mendocino County residents said the sanctuaries should reach farther north, possibly as far as the Oregon border. “We’re looking for permanent protection for the entire (Mendocino) coast,” Mendocino County Supervisor Dan Hamburg said Monday. The federal agency’s proposal is “better than nothing,” he said, adding that Mendocino will push for a greater expansion.

Rachel Binah of Little River, a veteran anti-drilling activist, noted that southerly currents would carry an oil spill north of Point Arena into the protected areas. But the proposed expansion “is a big deal,” she said.

The plan would add 2,771 square miles to the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones sanctuaries, which currently cover 1,808 square miles from south of the Farallon Islands to Bodega Bay. Expanding the sanctuaries to Point Arena would encompass a “thriving marine ecosystem” that sustains whales, sharks, salmon, crabs and the largest seabird breeding colony in the contiguous United States at the Farallon Islands, NOAA said in a press release.

California’s disdain for offshore oil development dates back to the Santa Barbara oil spill of 1969, which still ranks as third largest after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon and 1989 Exxon Valdez spills. The state halted offshore oil leasing that year, and Congress implemented a leasing moratorium on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts in 1982.

But the moratorium, which required annual reauthorization, lapsed in 2008, leaving the North Coast vulnerable to exploration of oil deposits off the Sonoma and Mendocino coasts. Tupper Hull, spokesman for the Western States Petroleum Association, reiterated Monday that his group’s members have “no interest” in tapping North Coast oil.

Public hearings on the proposed expansion and a draft environmental impact statement may be submitted through June 30. Public hearings will be conducted by NOAA at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bay Model Visitor Center in Sausalito on May 22, Point Arena City Hall June 16, Gualala Community Center June 17 and Bodega Bay Grange Hall June 18. All meetings are at 6 p.m.

Charter urged people to attend the hearings, saying they “are the place to close the deal” on coastal protection.

For more information, go to sanctuaryexpansion.org.

(You can reach Staff Writer Guy Kovner at 521-5457 or guy.kovner@pressdemocrat.com.)
Special thanks to Richard Charter